Welcome to Hunting NY, New York's #1 Hunting and Fishing forum and news portal.
![]() |
Welcome to HuntingNY.com, like most online communities you must register to post and participate in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of of the Hunting New York by signing inor creating an account.
|
Main
News and Articles
Hunting NY Store
Links
Our Sponsors and Partners
Contact Us
Need Help / Can't Register or Login? Click Here
Interested in sponsoring the site or a contest? Contact Us
Fins to Feathers Taxidermy
Innovative Tip-Down
Thrill Of The Hunt
Do you wear Orange? If so why? If not Why not? :)
#41
Posted 12 July 2010 - 04:25 PM
#42
Posted 12 July 2010 - 05:16 PM
Quote
Found this video that was pretty informative.
Bass Pro Shops Next Gen WOW Factor How Whitetail Deer See
Good video but I have to admit that the picture toward the end of the video where they were kind of showing it in black and white, that big white blob that was the blaze orange vest that she was wearing stuck out like a sore thumb even from what looked like quite a long distance. I'm not sure how a deer would interpret that big white blob. That may differ from deer to deer.
However, she was dead on when she stressed the need to curtail movement. That's not always as easily done as it is to say, but moving things that don't blend into the background are easy for anybody (or anything) to pick up on quickly.
Anyway, thanks for the video. It had some real interesting stuff in it.
Doc
#43
Posted 12 July 2010 - 06:26 PM
Spread the word, and tell your hunting friends & family about - HuntingNY.com - New York's Hunting Forums
#44
Posted 13 July 2010 - 11:31 AM
130" 14 Pnt.
Mathews Switchback XT 28" draw, 400 grain arrow @
Mathews Monster MR5 27" draw, 400 grain arrow @ 305fps
#45
Posted 13 July 2010 - 02:38 PM
Quote
I agree ...... you probably should be wearing a vest. I have a 1000' driveway through a thicket to get down to the road (My property). I won't walk down my driveway in gun season without a blaze orange hat and vest.
Sometimes we put a bit too much trust in our private land always truly being private. I encounter enough trespassers each year to know that simply is not the case.
My feeling is that blaze orange probably has cost me some deer over the years. Inspite of the deer's inability to distinguish color, I still believe that they can detect the intensity and brilliance of blaze orange, regardless of what color it appears to them. However, I have yet to see any deer that is worth any of my limbs, organs or my life. I have seen what a slug does to meat and bones, and there is no way that I ever want to experience any of that first hand on my body just for the sake of harvesting a deer.
Doc
#46
Posted 13 July 2010 - 02:58 PM
Yes that is true too that blaze orange does make it hard for you to look like a deer, but it also is important for purposes of letting other hunters know you are there. Over the years, I could not count the number of times I have watched other hunters that had an obvious intent of standing in a spot that I considered way too close to me. That is until they caught a flash of my blaze orange "pumpkin suit" and then they moved on. I'm sure there also is some benefit of having the extra visibility letting other hunters that you are in their line of fire when a deer passes between you.
Yes I know there are some hunters that are color blind. Also, there are some who get so excited you could be wearing a strobe light and it wouldn't make any difference. But I also know that if I am concealed in the woods wearing some of this super camo that is on the market with no blaze orange, likely nobody will see me until it just might be too late. That's a chance I'm not willing to take.
Doc
#47
Posted 13 July 2010 - 03:02 PM
#48
Posted 14 July 2010 - 07:48 PM
#49
Posted 14 July 2010 - 08:12 PM
After all is said and done, more is said than done.
#50
Posted 15 July 2010 - 06:05 AM
Several times over the years, I have seen guys in full camo during opening day of gun season on a very heavily pressured parcel of state land. That just plain shouldn't happen, and I have to wonder what is going through the minds of these idiots. I can't think of a single justification for such lunacy. I realize the excellent safety record that NYS has even though we don't have a blaze orange law, and I believe that has more to do with the fact that we have an excellent hunter safety mandatory program that seems to convince almost all hunters to wear the blaze orange. And yet I still see these jerks out there in full camo. And sure enough each year brings another list of people that get shot, mistaken for deer. And if you read the details, quite often they are not in B/O. Also, the headlines often only pay attention to the fatalities, but I am sure that even the wounded victims probably do not think that their experience was exactly a pleasant thing. Missing limbs and organs are not exactly a victimless occurrance. So anytime I see a blaze orange law being offered, I am 100% behind it. There's no reason not to have it.
Doc
#51
Posted 15 July 2010 - 02:14 PM
After all is said and done, more is said than done.
#52
Posted 15 July 2010 - 02:31 PM
#53
Posted 15 July 2010 - 05:35 PM
Here is something that always is rumbling around in my mind. We have this nice saying about being absolutely sure what's behind whatever we are shooting at. Well, in my estimation the only way you can abide by that is to do all your shooting on a certified rifle range where all vegetation in front of the target is removed, and a huge earthen backstop is provided behind what you are shooting at. All rod & gun clubs recognize this as the only way to be sure of what is behind the target and have spent great amounts of money and effort to create that kind of safe shooting area so that they can abide by the rule of, "always ensure that the area behind the target is absolutely clear". But, given the quality of todays camo patterns and colors, on just about any shot taken by any hunter, there is a possibility that some jerk could be hunkered in the background, dressed completely in some of that super-effective camo and be absolutely impossible to see. We've all seen the TV ads that show how totally a hunter can blend into a chunk of woods, and by golly the stuff really does work as advertised. So if we are really serious about being absolutely sure of the background behind the deer we are about to shoot at, we had better be doing all our hunting at the local rifle range. Obviously that isn't very practical, so there has to be some effort expended by all hunters to make themselves appear as obviously as possible as something human that shows up well in the woods.
So, there is at least some reasonable responsibility in terms of how much precaution we take when dressing for safety. As far as I am concerned, the very least effort that satisfies that responsibility is to wear adequate blaze orange. Failing to do that is not only dumb, but it is irresponsible and very well can lead to an accident that can claim as it's victims not only the one shot, but the rest of the life of the shooter. I personally would like to see that responsibility written into law.
Doc
#54
Posted 15 July 2010 - 05:37 PM
Quote
Oh man, that's mighty cold! Human life is held mighty cheap these days.
Doc
#55
Posted 15 July 2010 - 05:55 PM
Quote
Here is something that always is rumbling around in my mind. We have this nice saying about being absolutely sure what's behind whatever we are shooting at. Well, in my estimation the only way you can abide by that is to do all your shooting on a certified rifle range where all vegetation in front of the target is removed, and a huge earthen backstop is provided behind what you are shooting at. All rod & gun clubs recognize this as the only way to be sure of what is behind the target and have spent great amounts of money and effort to create that kind of safe shooting area so that they can abide by the rule of, "always ensure that the area behind the target is absolutely clear". But, given the quality of todays camo patterns and colors, on just about any shot taken by any hunter, there is a possibility that some jerk could be hunkered in the background, dressed completely in some of that super-effective camo and be absolutely impossible to see. We've all seen the TV ads that show how totally a hunter can blend into a chunk of woods, and by golly the stuff really does work as advertised. So if we are really serious about being absolutely sure of the background behind the deer we are about to shoot at, we had better be doing all our hunting at the local rifle range. Obviously that isn't very practical, so there has to be some effort expended by all hunters to make themselves appear as obviously as possible as something human that shows up well in the woods.
So, there is at least some reasonable responsibility in terms of how much precaution we take when dressing for safety. As far as I am concerned, the very least effort that satisfies that responsibility is to wear adequate blaze orange. Failing to do that is not only dumb, but it is irresponsible and very well can lead to an accident that can claim as it's victims not only the one shot, but the rest of the life of the shooter. I personally would like to see that responsibility written into law.
Doc
Amen to this POST + + +
Bill
#56
Posted 15 July 2010 - 07:19 PM
After all is said and done, more is said than done.
#57
Posted 16 July 2010 - 04:50 AM
I don't worry about it too much during bow season, because I don't believe there has ever been a case of a bowhunter accidentally shooting another hunter, thinking he was a deer. The range and nature of a bow doesn't really lend itself to that kind of longer distance mis-interpretation of the target. Also, the nature of an arrow is such that if a target is so obscured that you can't tell the difference between a hunter and a deer an arrow is not likely to get far enough to do any harm. My feeling is that if someone gets killed with an arrow and a claim of target mis-identification, the authorities better start opening up a homicide investigation .... lol.
Doc
#58
Posted 16 July 2010 - 08:29 AM
#59
Posted 16 July 2010 - 02:53 PM
I hunt deer on privet land and never with water fowl
======================================
For Those Who Understand No Explanation Is Needed
For Those Who Don't None Will Do
======================================
WE HUNT BY SIGHT-NOT BY SOUND
======================================
Member Of The NRA-Trophy Life Member of North American Hunting Club-Syosset Sportsman Club
=======================================
New York Hunter Safety Instructor
#60
Posted 17 July 2010 - 05:06 AM
SOB archery Staff
Hot shot release mfg staff shooter
Sand Dune archers Myrtle beach SC
Gilbertvile archers NY
Senior archers of Oneonta NY

















