Jump to content

Gillibrand has become a shill for Radical Progressives. She needs to go.


Recommended Posts

Cashing in on evil: "Right now, Republicans in Washington are pushing legislation allowing employers to fire single women for getting pregnant — AND they're leading an 'investigation' to undercut Planned Parenthood. This makes my head explode. I’m confident that if we had more women leading in Washington, we would not still be dealing with the right wing’s efforts to trample women’s health care." —Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) in a fundraising email

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cashing in on evil: "Right now, Republicans in Washington are pushing legislation allowing employers to fire single women for getting pregnant — AND they're leading an 'investigation' to undercut Planned Parenthood. This makes my head explode. I’m confident that if we had more women leading in Washington, we would not still be dealing with the right wing’s efforts to trample women’s health care." —Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) in a fundraising email

So are you supporting employers having the right to fire a single woman for getting pregnant & defunding planned parenthood?

 

Planned%20Parenthood_zps9miyvhte.png

Edited by wildcat junkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Junkie, I'd like you to show me any real evidence the GOP is trying to allow pregnant women to get fired.

 

As far as Federal Funds for PP, there should not be any taxpayer money spent on anything the government sees as benevolence, when it is really a social agenda and thinly veiled vote buying scheme.

 

You're using a chart supplied by PP here.  Do you trust it?  This comes from their own annual reports.

 

"Planned Parenthood continues to claim that abortion is three percent of its services in the 2010 report. By comparing the number of condoms, birth control pills, and other low cost items distributed to the number of abortions it commits, Planned Parenthood intentionally misleads the public and those in charge of providing government funding for its grisly business by painting a grossly inaccurate picture of what its business is all about.  By comparing PP’s abortion income with its clinic income, we get a much more accurate picture of Planned Parenthood’s business model. In 2010, Planned Parenthood’s abortion income was 51.5 percent of its clinic income."

PPFA Annual Reports via Life News

Edited by Mr VJP
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read on how PP is an organization with great political might and deception.

 

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/10/05/false-abortion-is-only-3-of-planned-parenthoods-services/

 

http://www.abort73.com/blog/planned_parenthood_and_the_percentages_of_abortion/

 

Regardless, if Gillibrand is on their side, she's a shill and needs to go, because unfortunately, her head isn't going to do us a favor and explode.

 

Edited by Mr VJP
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that $0.00 of federal funds that go to planned parenthood pay for abortions right?  It's against the law.  So when A-Holes talk about defunding it, they are talking about taking away the funding for healthcare, contraception and other women's services.  That's it.  Nothing to do with abortion at all.

 

Let me say that again so it might sink in... your tax dollars don't support abortions at planned parenthood.  The only pay for women's health services and contraception. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BellR, have you ever heard of creative accounting?  You honestly believe the nation's largest abortion provider doesn't use any of it's federal funding to exist, grow, advertise, pay staff and prosper?  How do you suppose they actually pay for the 305,000+ abortions they do every year?

 

Think about that and let it sink in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you ever tried to do "creative accounting" on a federal grant?  It would not be an easy thing to do, especially if you happen to be doing that for an institution that 1/2 of the government hates and wants to prove is doing something wrong.  Even on grants that aren't under such scrutiny you still have to justify the expenditures.  They don't just hand them a big suitcase full of money and say, "Now don't spend this on abortions!".  They meet the goverment's burden of proof that they don't spend the money on abortions.  You know what doesn't meet ANY burden of proof? Your accusations that they do.  Until you can find some proof from an independent agency that they do indeed use the funds as you claim, you have no basis to your claims at all. 

 

And the answer to your question is pretty simple, they charge for them the same way you would pay for anything anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good old American capitalism works within the realm of legality Junkie.  Leftists don't.

 

BellR, the money the government gives them is lumped into general expenses.  Could they do abortions without general expenses?  The world is full of unicorns and rainbows for those who don't see it.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good old American capitalism works within the realm of legality Junkie.  Leftists don't.

 

BellR, the money the government gives them is lumped into general expenses.  Could they do abortions without general expenses?  The world is full of unicorns and rainbows for those who don't see it.

So what is illegal about selling fetal body parts for research. Better to chuck them in the dumpster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better look into the federal laws about selling body parts and organs.  It's a felony.

 

Nobody gives a crap what women do with their bodies.  Many do care what they do with the bodies of the babies they carry inside of their bodies though.

 

Admit it.  Pro Abortion is about power and control over women and which ones are acceptable for reproduction.  It started as racism and poverty control and it has progressed even further along those lines since the beginning.

 

Edited by Mr VJP
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

 

Admit it.  Pro Abortion is about power and control over women and which ones are acceptable for reproduction.  It started as racism and poverty control and it has progressed even further along those lines since the beginning.

Holy $hit your delusional rants never cease to amaze me. Allowing women to make their own choice is power and control over them while you REICH wing lunatics forcing your will on them is freedom?

 

You have your head so far up your a$$ that you can probably see your tonsils. What little credibility you have with the less insane member of this forum just took another hit! 

 

You should head the old adage that it is better to remain silent & have people think you are stupid that to open your pie-hole & remove all doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy $hit your delusional rants never cease to amaze me. Allowing women to make their own choice is power and control over them while you REICH wing lunatics forcing your will on them is freedom?

 

You have your head so far up your a$$ that you can probably see your tonsils. What little credibility you have with the less insane member of this forum just took another hit! 

 

You should head the old adage that it is better to remain silent & have people think you are stupid that to open your pie-hole & remove all doubt.

 

Your personal opinion (prejudice) and attack on me regarding my statement is indicative of a man who will not answer the question presented to him.  

 

Have you ever looked into the history of PP?  Heard of Margaret Sanger?  Acknowledge the inherit racism in her founding of PP?  Understood her desire for population control?  Read about her elitist desires for a white utopia?  

 

Of course you have.  But it would be against your political ideology to admit it.  You're not fooling anyone with your insults.  They're just the inane rebuttals of a Leftist political tool.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting back to Gillibrand, "A leopard doesn't change it's spots".

 

She was a California educated lawyer who represented Big Tobacco during her NY law firm career.  It's interesting to see how she manipulated things in their favor.  It's a very telling characteristic that shows how easy it is for her to adopt any ideology that benefits her and her peers, with a total lack of remorse regarding the danger it poses to the innocent and the general public at large.  

 

Her current career is that of Liberal Democrat Leftist Progressive NY State Senator.  A very politically Left of center state.  Since her appointment as Senator by the governor (She was not elected for her first term) she has donned the mantle of Leftist Progressive Liberalism with a vengeance in order to get votes.  It helped her win an elected term when she ran for election.  If you investigate her voting record as a member of Congress before that, you may be surprised to find she was considered a political moderate, even somewhat conservative, as she played the role required for election in more middle of the road upstate NY.

 

I seriously doubt there is enough intelligence in the NY State electorate to realize they are being played like a fiddle by her and the rest of her party, but it would be good for the people of NY if they actually voted this shill out of office the next chance they got.

 

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/27/nyregion/27gillibrand.html?pagewanted=all

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  It started as racism and poverty control 

 

 

It still is. PP targets minorities. Their 'health' centers are almost always in the poor parts of town.

 

 

Washington (CNN)Ben Carson on Tuesday slammed Planned Parenthood, telling CNN's Jake Tapper that the women's health organization "doesn't seem to understand the sanctity of human life and is willing to destroy that."

 

Appearing on "The Lead with Jake Tapper," Carson added that Planned Parenthood is "an organization whose founder believed in eugenics," a reference to Margaret Sanger, and added, "even today, the plurality of their clinics are in minority communities."

 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/28/politics/ben-carson-planned-parenthood/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Company Trying To Block Video That Could Prove Babies Were Born alive

 

 

The leader of the Center for Medical Progress, the organisation exposing Planned Parenthood, told CNN “New Day” this morning that a biomedical company is trying to silence CMP because they are “very scared” of footage coming out that will prove babies were born alive before being “aborted” and having tissue and organs harvested.

California based StemExpress, a company closely allied with Planned Parenthood that provides fetal tissue to researchers, has managed to convince a Superior Court judge to issue a temporary restraining order against CMP.

 

 

 

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/cmp-head-company-trying-to-block-video-that-could-prove-aborted-babies-were-born-alive-then-harvested.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...