mayo

Like the wanted poster the best. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

That is scary. We need to hire (elect) people who respect us instead of electing people who no better than we do on how to run our lives. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Yeah. I deleted the sentence that pro-freedom people excludes the modern Democratic Party. It's a shame that a major political party has such contempt for individual liberty and the principles which this country was founded on. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

You're correct. This can only lead to abuse. I think you explained what would happen if such a law was passed. And you can only imagine how this would be expanded in time. Doctors would ask if there are guns in the house and there would be legal repercussions if you lied. Our only long term solution is to vote for pro-freedom people of any party. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

NH generates far less in total but that doesn't mean its citizens ought to pay for us. Comrade de Blasio is spending tons of money foolishly regarding the homeless problem (and elsewhere). People in Sullivan and Ulster county don't have to pay for it. I live in deep blue Brooklyn. My taxes pay for it. I'm pretty sure Brooklyn generates more federal dollars than does Ulster and Sullivan county combined. What we spend our taxes on is our business as NY residents. It's not NH or Iowa's concern. It's our choice and our responsibility. I don't want to pay more in taxes either. It's our responsibility to hire politicians who won't tax and spend us to death. We have statewide elections next year. Let's get our fellow citizens to rally around a less bloated, smarter government whose first reaction to solving a problem isn't reaching into our pockets. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Because States are not administrative provinces of the federal government. They are district and separate. If NYS, in its infinite wisdom, wants to give illegals instate college tuition then the residents of that state should pay for it. Same as when this same all-knowing government decides to keep its citizens SAFE by limiting magazines to 7 rounds - this only applies to NYS. No reason someone from NH should pay for NY and California giving illegals instate or free college. And let's not forget the job and tax revenue losses when ATI and other companies left New York. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I think most of us here in NY will come out roughly the same. I'll be saving in lower tax rate but have less property and state income deduction. I make above the median income and don't think I'll be hit hard (if at all). We'll find out for sure after the accountants go over the details. Philosophically it makes a lot of sense. Why should a plumber in New Hampshire subsidize tax and spend NY residents. Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk