Jump to content

For thise relying in the courts to over turn the SAFE ACT


Recommended Posts

One of the best replies to the article itself:


"Many decry this as a failure but indeed it's PERFECT! 


Heller was CLEAR that it does not pass muster to claim that banning handguns was permissible because shotguns were "allowed". The court admitted that banning entire classes of arms was and is not within the power of government, even the third branch, to decide. Heller also made clear that arms protected are specifically those useful in military conflict. This judge is off her rocker.


So why is this perfect? Simple. Now that the banners are on the official record, it will just take a plain split and SCOTUS will be hoisted on its own due process petard. It will, by constitutional mandate, be forced to settle that plain split.


Ironically, the best AR-15 salesman himself, the usurper in chief, has helped dispel this judge's idiocy about in common use! Many more rifles are manufactured and purchased now because of the banners threats and actual bans.


Folks, we NEED bogus decisions like this line of bovine excrement! The worse and most far reaching the better. For they are the most blatantly unconstitutional and as such the most target rich environment to take on and defeat.


Compromises are not needed here - standing and fighting it out is. Not even a tetter totter SCOTUS has the guts to claim to the American people that semi automatic rifles aren't protected. Heck even semi auto shotguns. Quite frankly, any protection those have must apply to select fire weapons as well- simply because the thing that protects them is exactly the same. The RIGHT to keep and bear them. SCOTUS cannot dispel its own method - useful in the military context - after holding that line specifically all this time AND within Heller itself.


Every weapon CAN be dangerous, depending upon its user. Unusual?  Why then ANY new technology would qualify. Yet, SCOTUS has specifically held that technological advancements are not a hinge upon which rights rest. It did so in Heller as well, citing that laptops and printers are protected by the first Amendment regardless of the fact the framers had no concept of them. Ink pens and cell phones just the same.


There is no way this decision stands. It's literally impossible."


 


The SAFE Act is going all the way to the SCOTUS before it dies.  If you think any elected official is going to overturn it, you're dreaming.


 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see.  

 

After the Heller decision set 2A precedents out the azz, I think you are wrong.  No elected hack in NY is gonna risk re-election by "allowing assault weapons back on the streets".  The Leftist media in NY would have a field day with that and the idiot electorate in NY would swallow their BS hook, line and sinker.

 

Vote in whoever you like, based upon history in Conn, MD, Mass, NJ, etc., nothing will change.

 

You're in an anti-gun Blue state.  The SCOTUS is the only chance you have left.  Better wake up.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah like obamacare was gonna be struck down.  Just a way to pass it on to others so you do not have to do anything and not be blamed if it dos not work.  All the court needs is one more liberal biased judge and we are screwed, although I doubt they will even touch the case as it is a state based law.  They wiil pass on it to save face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Cuomo was voted out by some miracle this November, do you really think anyone in NYS, including a new Governor would overturn the SAFE act?   NO way.  I've been saying all along that many people upstate underestimate the population numbers downstate.  You simply don't have the numbers upstate to make a difference.  Downstate no matter who you elect, they won't do a damned thing to overturn this law.  The best bet the people of NYS have is the conservative leaning supreme court.  And if you want anything done, you need to do it with all deliberate speed, before one of the older conservative judges dies or resigns, and Obama gets to appoint another liberal to the bench which will then make it a liberal court.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the court were to go majority liberal, it would be legally impossible to rule against past precedents about the 2A.  The Heller decision was a landmark case regarding the right to bear arms and specifically stated these types of gun bans are not constitutional.

 

If the SCOTUS were to turn into a rogue court, that actually violates the rights of the citizens outlined in the US Constitution, you would then see the beginning of major resistance to tyranny, and the beginning of the 2nd revolution.  It would not be peaceful again in this land for some time.  I for one, hope the government isn't that foolish.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...