Immediate Effect of Electing our Racist President

[Uptown Redneck]

http://nyti.ms/2eUNPQz

[10point]

[10point]

[Rattler]

First off, these effects took place prior to Trumps election, even prior to his candidacy.  Second, very few attacks against whites are classified as "hate crimes".  Thirdly, when you look into all of the factors involved from an educated statistician's point of view, the report cited is full of errors and is being used for political purposes.

It's becoming more obvious the FBI is no longer credible when it comes to crime information, or prosecuting high level political officials.

 

"Fresh off the election of Donald Trump, the nation was greeted by news of the stunning rise in "hate crimes," as detailed in the FBI's latest iteration of its Hate Crimes Statistics report. At first blush, it offers frightening prospects for the safety of various minority groups across America. At second blush, not so much.

New York Magazine writer Eric Levitz breathlessly begins his article, "Hate Crimes Against Muslims Increased by 67 Percent Last Year," with the angst-ridden declaration that these crimes had reached "their highest levels since the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks, according to FBI data released on Monday."

From the fainting couch, he continued, "In 2015, there were 257 reported crimes rooted in anti-Muslim bias, up from 154 incidents the previous year. Notably, this uptick coincided with a GOP presidential primary in which a candidate who decried the Justice Department's concern with violent, anti-Muslim rhetoric finished second to one who proposed banning all Muslims from the country."

As usual, the devil is in the details, so let's point out a few that drastically change the narrative.

For example, the FBI analyzes incidents reported in 2015, but it wasn't until late in the year that Trump's candidacy really took off, so one would be hard pressed to explain why the increase could be attributable to Trump. Other factors are far more plausible, including the series of deadly Islamic terror attacks (Paris and San Bernardino among the targets), or the contention fomented by Barack Obama's attempt (with the help of the Rainbow Mafia) to force Americans to allow grown men to share bathrooms with women and little girls, or violent protests led by Black Lives Matter thugs. Is it possible that maybe, like Newton's Third Law of Motion, these actions triggered opposite reactions?

Another critical point to understand is that the number of these incidents is incredibly small, and the threshold by which an action qualifies as a "hate crime" is ludicrously low.

Of all hate crimes reported in 2015, two-thirds did not involve any form of physical violence. And of those that did, nearly 70% involved only simple assault, which the FBI defines as an incident where no weapon is used and no serious injury occurred. This category of crime includes intimidation (including verbal threats or name-calling), which accounted for 41% of all "assaults." And considering how many privileged, weak-spined snowflakes roam America — grown adults reduced to sobbing when their "safe space" has been violated by the presence of "offensive" Halloween costumes — this number should be taken with a truckload of salt.

Simple assaults, including slapping, shoving, or spitting on, accounted for 39% of "hate crimes." In other words, only a small fraction of hate crimes — the kind that spring to mind when we hear the phrase, like aggravated assault (18.7%), rape and murder (well under 1% each) — actually include significant physical violence.

Keep all this in mind as you read back over that headline of a 67% increase in hate crimes against Muslims. The total number of reported "hate crimes" against Muslims in 2015 was 257, and using the aforementioned percentages as a guide, that means that 51 Muslims were seriously assaulted in 2015, out of a total American Muslim population of roughly 3.3 million. So one out of every 64,706 Muslims suffered physical violence as a result of a hate crime in 2015, and one out of every 1,079,823 blacks. In fact, there were almost as many black-on-black murders in the city of Chicago in 2015 as there were total "hate crimes" against blacks in the entire United States the same year. Again, assuming these crimes were specifically motivated by hateful bigotry.

It should go without saying that unprovoked attacks against ANY individual, regardless of race, sex, religion, or any other factor, are completely unacceptable. At the same time, it is dishonest to portray America as a place where blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, homosexuals, transgenders, and women are living in constant fear of attack. That's the narrative Democrats like Harry Reid despicably advance, though.

Another thing to consider is that these numbers are based on crimes reported to law enforcement authorities. Yet when there are numerous examples of hate crime hoaxes being perpetrated — like the Muslim woman claiming she was beaten by white male Trump supporters as they screamed racial slurs, who now admits she made it all up — even the reported numbers become suspect.

Oh, and by the way, Jews are more likely to be the victims of hate crimes than Muslims. But that doesn't fit the narrative. Not when even criticizing Islam is a "hate crime" to some people.

The bottom line is that each and every violent criminal deserves to be prosecuted and jailed, and no decent, honest American should ever be subjected to this kind of abuse. But categorizing name-calling and being offended as "hate crimes," or lying about these kinds of attacks, makes it harder for true victims to be believed and protected, and it instills in some of us an unjustified fear of fellow Americans, whom some erroneously believe to hate them. This serves no one except those who profit from social, racial and political discord."

Mark Alexander

[Uptown Redneck]

44 minutes ago, Rattler said:

the report cited is being used for political purposes.

 

 

"

May every day find reports discrediting the newly elected Clown president. 

[10point]

52 minutes ago, Uptown Redneck said:

May every day find reports discrediting the newly elected Clown president. 

I thought you were the clown 

[philoshop]

In the ether of this new wave of 'hate crimes' I could easily consider myself a victim, being 'attacked' every time Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama says something about my white American heritage. Be careful about how you define victims and perpetrators, and don't think for one second that it's a lesser offense when a liberal attacks a conservative, like what is happening across the country right now. Selective indignation is something Democrats have raised to an art form, and it's an ugly little bug that needs to be squashed before it takes our entire country down to it's level.

[rachunter]

[Core]

19 hours ago, Uptown Redneck said:

May every day find reports discrediting the newly elected Clown president. 

If one goes to huffpost as much as you do, I'm sure one can find one every hour.

Edited November 17, 2016 by Core

[Core]

15 hours ago, philoshop said:

In the ether of this new wave of 'hate crimes' I could easily consider myself a victim, being 'attacked' every time Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama says something about my white American heritage. Be careful about how you define victims and perpetrators, and don't think for one second that it's a lesser offense when a liberal attacks a conservative, like what is happening across the country right now. Selective indignation is something Democrats have raised to an art form, and it's an ugly little bug that needs to be squashed before it takes our entire country down to it's level.

Sorry if you're white you're basically immune from hate crimes.

It's pretty obvious that some of these crimes are now false flags as well. I have no doubt whatsoever a meaningful percentage of people writing kkk or swastikas or whatever are from the left trying to incite a reaction. In fact, there is proof many of these are fake.

[10point]

38 minutes ago, Core said:

Sorry if you're white you're basically immune from hate crimes.

It's pretty obvious that some of these crimes are now false flags as well. I have no doubt whatsoever a meaningful percentage of people writing kkk or swastikas or whatever are from the left trying to incite a reaction. In fact, there is proof many of these are fake.

Yep the same groups rioting paid for by soros are the ones painting swastikas and kkk   bunch of scumbags 

[Core]

On the news in rochester last night there is some big pile of debris from construction and evidently people put signs on it for some reason (maybe if you live in that area you have no hobbies). One sign was somebody a day ago took an old flat screen TV and wrote KKK on it. Also at suny geneseo somebody wrote Trump with a swastika. Now, can you really picture a trump supporter writing trump with a swastika? Honestly how many nazis are there around suny geneso? Probably none. If I had to bet my life I'd say at least one of those was not at all done by a trump supporter, if not both. 

[10point]

On 11/16/2016 at 1:23 PM, Uptown Redneck said:

May every day find reports discrediting the newly elected Clown president. 

Uptownclown how many kkk trump signs did you spray paint this week all over town for soros ? 

 

Edited November 17, 2016 by WNYBuckHunter
inappropriate language, plese see the forum TOS

[Uptown Redneck]

5 hours ago, 10point said:

 

Did you suck soros sack this weeked for a  pay raise

No

Edited November 17, 2016 by WNYBuckHunter
inappropriate language, plese see the forum TOS

[Rattler]

On 11/16/2016 at 1:23 PM, Uptown Redneck said:

May every day find reports discrediting the newly elected Clown president. 

In order to discredit Trump, the reports would have to be factual and true.

The reports that are coming out do not discredit Trump because they are not factual or true.  (See my prior post on your OP)

However, there are many people in America, all leftists, that choose to believe they are true, no matter what facts are presented, and choose to spread the propaganda for evil purposes.  If they keep this up, things will end up very badly for the country.  I for one will work to see that it ends very badly for leftists who lie.

 

[steve863]

30 minutes ago, Rattler said:

In order to discredit Trump, the reports would have to be factual and true.

The reports that are coming out do not discredit Trump because they are not factual or true.  (See my prior post on your OP)

However, there are many people in America, all leftists, that choose to believe they are true, no matter what facts are presented, and choose to spread the propaganda for evil purposes.  If they keep this up, things will end up very badly for the country.  I for one will work to see that it ends very badly for leftists who lie.

 

A story needs to be "factual" to discredit someone??  You guys believed the story that Hillary beat the crap out of Podesta after she lost the election, how the hell do you know that was "factual"??  Did he have a black eye when he talked to the crowd that night?

Honestly, you guys need to stop and listen to the crap that comes out of your mouths.  You accuse the other side of believing stuff that isn't factual, when the reality is that you guys do the same $#!+.  I've said it before, the extremists on the left AND the right deserve each other.  They are both as ignorant as one can get.

 

 

Edited November 17, 2016 by steve863

[burmjohn]

Guys the language, please watch it.   

[Uptown Redneck]

2 hours ago, Rattler said:

In order to discredit Trump, the reports would have to be factual and true.

The reports that are coming out do not discredit Trump because they are not factual or true.  (See my prior post on your OP)

However, there are many people in America, all leftists, that choose to believe they are true, no matter what facts are presented, and choose to spread the propaganda for evil purposes.  If they keep this up, things will end up very badly for the country.  I for one will work to see that it ends very badly for leftists who lie.

 

In order to discredit Trump, the reports would have to be factual and true.

           Not at all, all that has to be done is spread news that makes the Clown President look bad, in a propaganda war truth hardly matters. You yourself has admitted as much. 

And yes I very much look forward to enjoying watching things going very badly for the next administration. I wish him nothing but complete failure and utter misery for the next 4 years of his upcoming term. 

 

[philoshop]

5 hours ago, steve863 said:

A story needs to be "factual" to discredit someone??  You guys believed the story that Hillary beat the crap out of Podesta after she lost the election, how the hell do you know that was "factual"??  Did he have a black eye when he talked to the crowd that night?

Honestly, you guys need to stop and listen to the crap that comes out of your mouths.  You accuse the other side of believing stuff that isn't factual, when the reality is that you guys do the same $#!+.  I've said it before, the extremists on the left AND the right deserve each other.  They are both as ignorant as one can get.

 

 

I'm not really sure why I'm being quoted here, but I'll give it a stab. "Her behavior" in this quote is entirely about the fact that she couldn't even be bothered to address her supporters who stood there for ten or twelve hours in the Javits Center waiting to hear from her. It doesn't really matter why she stood those people up and left them hanging, it was an extremely boorish gesture that I don't think we've ever seen from any other US presidential candidate in history. It speaks volumes about her lack of integrity.

[Rattler]

I find it revealing people admit they will support lies, that they know are lies, to stifle a President.  America suffers when you do that.  Everything Obama and Hillary have been accused of, that has been proven, has been ignored by their supporters, yet they will support lies about Trump.  

I will not support anything Trump does that is "deplorable" if it's proven true.

Why?  Because I want what's best for this country, not what's best for my comrades.

BTW, I wasn't even aware of the story about Podesta until just now.  I don't follow anything about Hillary anymore because she is now inconsequential.

 

 

Edited November 18, 2016 by Rattler