Rattler

Hey genius, wouldn't it be logical the country with the most firearms has the most "gun" crimes? But the countries with the most "gun control" have the most crimes!! Ban firearms and you will see a huge rise in violent crime. It has happened in every country that has done it. But their "gun" crimes are low, BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE GUNS! Only a simpleton believes "simple" facts, which are anything but when you analyze the figures used in the stats.

This is a perfect example of Leftist "Equality". God Help America.

That's because they live in a make believe world that doesn't interact with the real world. It's like going to an automotive technical school and learning only how to build and fix vehicles that run on air and are pollution free.

So what if they bought and paid for one of his books. LOL! They have nothing to do with Lott, or his research. The whole reason he has been attacked by the anti gun groups is because his figures and methodology in the book, are flawless and beyond criticism. Everything that has ever been published challenging his statistics has been trashed as pure dishonesty, with a bias towards corrupting statistics to make a case, rather than present the truth.

On the other side of thought, when it happens, it will be in the Democratic bastions of the country. America's leftist liberal infested cities, where most of the fools who befriend those who swear to kill them. live. So, that does work out to be karma, as well as being incredibly ironic. Maybe then we will be able to eliminate terrorists around the globe, because all of the fools trying to stop that from happening won't be around anymore. Isn't that where Redneck lives? I'm sure his tombstone epithet will read, "They didn't mean to do it. The Right Wing made them do it!"

Ignore him, and his grenades. They never have any effect anyway.

WRONG! It has NOT always been that way! It has been that way since the elected officials in this land decided they are above the law and it doesn't apply to them. It may have been over 200 years ago that it wasn't true, but anyone willing to accept it and able to "get over it" is a true sheep and a fool! When it is proven someone escaped prosecution because of someone they knew, BOTH of them should be prosecuted and jailed!

I won't spend one iota of energy pointing out all of the flaws in the methodology employed to corrupt the numbers in this study, other than to say read Prof. John Lott's book, "More Guns, Less Crime" and learn what the reality of gun control does. It amazes me people would be stupid enough to read that article and think it offers a single shred of proof that gun control reduces crime. Anytime an article uses the phrase, "gun violence", you know it's biased and should be immediately ignored.

“No one is above the law,” she said. “To suggest that the most powerful people in our nation should escape liability when they violate clearly established law defies the most fundamental principle of our legal system.” “At a time when racial and religious profiling are put forward as serious policy proposals for dealing with everything from immigration to terrorism, it is more important than ever that the high court affirm that government officials, especially those at the highest levels, can be held accountable when they break the law,” she said. I would think Hillary would be terrified of the SCOTUS finding these government officials guilty.

The UN sees the solution to global instability in the NEW WORLD ORDER. No countries, borders, or nationality anymore. Just one big tyrannical governing body made up of the most powerful people on the planet today. The very same people who are guilty of causing all the current global instability. Now do you see how this was their plan all along? The UN also knows a revolution in one country can succeed, but a world revolution is unprecedented and much harder to win. The UN would have no problem allowing the murder of a half billion people to bring "stability" (compliance) to the planet, in order to achieve their goal of total domination of the masses.

First of all, people sell guns to criminals they know will kill people with them, all the time. Second, any nation that had a rogue agent sell a nuke to terrorists would claim they had no control over it and ignore any sanctions by asking, "Or else what?" The "or else" from Clinton would be the same as crossing Obama's "red line in the sand". NOTHING! Why did the US do nothing to Pakistan for harboring Bin Laden for years? Because Pakistan said they didn't know he was there. Deny it all you like, but it WILL happen if Clinton gets elected. It may still happen if Trump gets elected, and we can blame Obama for that. The worst part is, when it happens, it will be the American citizen that loses, because Martial Law will be implemented and all of your rights will be suspended, probably forever.

Because they also know Clinton would allow a nuclear strike against the US to go unanswered and surrender to any enemy without a fight. Why doesn't the NYT write an article about that?

This is not paranoia, it's fact! https://www.nratv.com/series/commentators/episode/commentators-season-6-episode-19-how-isis-could-get-a-nuke-across-our-border?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_content=nratv_com_series_commentators_episode_commentators-season-6-episode-19-how-isis-could-get-a-nuke-across-our-border-2016-10-11&utm_campaign=Video

If the left gets to destroy the economies of the west by implementing their ineffective climate change mandates, we will all be looking forward to the big asteroid hit that's probably going to destroy the world anyway.

Trump may not be close to what we would like in a president, but Hillary would be a total disaster for America. If she wins, stick a fork in America, it's done. I could list 100 reasons why, but I think we all know them, including the OP.

P.S. How is it this person was doing a thesis on the psychology of climate change "deniers", without having to do an unbiased counterpoint about the psychology of climate change supporters? Why was it allowed to ignore the demands being made on others, by people who basically have not proven climate change is man made, nor the level of effectiveness their "solutions" will have? I eagerly await the next thesis paper that is "fair and balanced". LOL!

Psychology influences an individual's demand for proof that climate change is man made, just as it does another individual's demand for crushing regulation, bigger government, huge economic costs, prosecution of those who question if man is the problem and stupid studies seeking to force acceptance by those who question them. So what?

Any American who thinks none of the things outlined affect them is an idiot.

And it will be because Leftist Progressive PC idiots allowed some footballers to be disrespectful to the country. A business that does that in America deserves to go under. But the blame still goes to all those who want to "change" America. The NFL can be acceptable again for anyone interested after they clean house and fix their bias.

That's the Progressive goal. All Capitalism must die!

Wake up!!

People should ignore football entirely. How many people still follow what's happening in Afghanistan? We've been there 15 years now! People are still getting killed for what amounts to less than minimum wage and they do it to keep those terrorists from killing you. Those guys should be stars in America, not people defending a ball.

I believe all cell phone carriers can show you a map that shows where they have service. In the Catskills, I think Verizon is the best, but there are paces you won't get service. The ADK's are the same, but there are a LOT of places you won't get service.

Don't worry about the feedback. Post the best reply to it you can and forget it. Most buyers and sellers understand the Californian buyers are a-holes. They won't believe the guy's feedback. Put "No Sales To California" in every future GB sale and block anyone in that state who tries to bid. If he didn't win, the auction would relist and probably sell for more eventually.

Remember, if Hillary wins, then dies, we get that moron.