The_Field_Ager

Ben Shapiro takes on Ben Affleck and the myth that only a tiny minority of Muslims worldwide are radical.

So much for that piece of fantasy and myth: Question: Does the Quran really contain dozens of verses promoting violence? Summary Answer: The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter. Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

You mean like this?

No you haven't. And it's completely relevant. This is the text that fuels your so-called 'extremism'. Only a blind liberal would call that Irrelevant . Hilarious stuff. How can you claim to understand motivation when you haven't read the motivating text?

That's old testament Judaism. Not from the New, Christian Testament, like I asked. Keep trying.

Even if he did the veil would not lift. He would continue to claim that Islamic extremists are not living by the book, despite the book's endless calls for violence. Over 60% of the Qu'ran is focused on denigrating non-Muslims. AT is one of those people just better left to stew in their own fantasy life.

You won't find any of the liberal keyboard warriors here going near the place. They are scared witless of Islam and prefer to attack Christians long since dead.

I'm afraid your word does not constitute any form of proof. Certainly not in any academic sense. Here are some interesting reviews of Professor Stark's book on the Crusades. More excellent reviews here: http://www.amazon.com/Gods-Battalions-The-Case-Crusades/dp/0061582603

Show us in the New Testament where Jesus says that beating your wife is God's will. There are plenty of Qu'ranic texts dealing with the violence and slavery that Allah wills on the conquered Kafir.

Laughable ignorance which you can't prove either. Liberals like to perpetuate myths about fascist politicians and barbaric Christians. Hans Christian Anderson would be jealous of such powers of imagination.

The Sufi cleric who founded 'Islamberg' is also the founder of Muslims of America. Despite the clerics protestations, MOA have been linked with Jamaat al Fuqra, a known terrorist group. Declassified FBI documents have linked both groups. http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/02/terrorist-cell-texas-declassified-fbi-documents-reveal-jamaat-ul-fuqra-enclave-near-sweeney-tx/ And yet the liberal fantasy of the kind, pacifist Sufi will win the day as far as their own favored narrative is concerned. Of that I have no doubt. It's too scary to think otherwise.

So much for that theory: Salafi Violence and Sufi Tolerance? Rethinking Conventional Wisdom http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/311/html Are Sufis essentially non-violent? http://tribune.com.pk/story/105628/are-sufis-essentially-non-violent/ And I don't believe these guys are Sufi anyway. Muslims of the Americas, who headquarter in Islamberg, have links with Pakistani terror groups.

They weren't actually Christian then, if this behavior is true. You fail to see this obviously, but then we know why.

Yes, they are true. Professor Rodney Stark's exposition ( God's Battalions) on the true motivations of the Crusades is one of the best and most accessible and balanced books on the matter. Of course, you won't read this or any other material that actually deals with facts. With liberals you see, it is too difficult to reason them out of a position that they have not reasoned themselves into. Emotive bias rules to roost.

Not only is AT ignorant of history , like most liberals, he is obsessed with ancient history and belligerent in his refusal to deal with current affairs in a rational manner, based on the realities of 2015.

Again with the liberal tactic of shooting the messenger and ignoring the message. We are on to you. I have a copy of your play-book. Lot's of pictures, very little actual content.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/381953/

This has to be one of the chief manifestations of the cultural and national suicide that liberals are bringing down on western civilization.

It's hilarious to see liberals fret of nonexistent Christian 'whackos' , when there are 35 known Islamic training camps in the US. I don't doubt there are more. And as the French and British experience has recently demonstrated - monitoring does nothing for the safety of citizens. The Hebdo killers were known and had been monitored for years.

Egypt warns of terror-linked Muslim Brotherhood organizations like CAIR operating in U.S. http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/01/19/first-the-uae-put-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-cair-on-its-designated-terrorist-list-now-egypt-warns-of-terror-linked-muslim-brotherhood-organizations-like-cair-operating-in-u-s/

Liberals 'Facilitating a Denial' About Islamic Terror http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/terrorism-islam-liberals-paris/2015/01/08/id/617318/

Only if your a liberal fantasist who sees fascists under the bed, as you seem to. It's worth noting the classic liberal tactic here of shooting the messenger and ignoring the message. Hilarious stuff wildcat. You are a cartoon character come to life. Liberals like yourself have set the scene (directly or otherwise) for these Jihadists, with your constant appeasement and pathological obsession with mythical political characters that only exist on the Marxist news wires.

http://theunitedwest.org/

Except Christians have not used war and violence to establish a Christian state in the middle east. Christians are not training for holy war in camps all over western nations. Christians do not hold to a world view that contradicts our social order on it's most basic levels. Christians are not calling for Sharia law in all the host nations they inhabit. Christians do not treat women like dogs. The New testament does not call for the enslavement of women and children of the Kafir or Infidel ( you and me) Christians are not calling for an end to free speech in western host nations. Christians are not hurling gay men of buildings in the streets of Mosul Christians are not putting the heads of their enemies on fence posts in the middle of town. Christians are not selling young girls into sex slavery in captured territory Christians are not attacking NYC police with hatchets and guns at the behest of the Holy See in Rome. The list goes on. You see what you did there? You tried to equate apples to oranges.