Jump to content

JFB

Members
  • Posts

    318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Hunting New York - NY Hunting, Deer, Bow Hunting, Fishing, Trapping, Predator News and Forums

Media Demo

Links

Calendar

Store

Posts posted by JFB

  1. Ha-ha-ha ..... I can just picture hunters walking up to the hunting counter of Walmarts or Dicks and wrestling a bloody old doe carcass up onto the counter so they can get their buck license. :sarcastichand:

     

    Obviously large box stores would not be a check station. In Ohio, they used to register all sorts of mom and pop stores, gas stations, etc. I bought a license at a local bar once. They have since got away from checking in deer but most in Ohio wish they'd go back from what I understand. 

  2. Went to Runnings in Canandaigua and no real deals. They did have an affordable one by Big Game (the Spectra I think it was called) for $140 range but they sold out. Nothing else in the price range and features I'm seeking. Same at Dicks/Walmart anywhere near Rochester. I'll keep my eyes open

  3. Earn a buck program only works if you have the man power which DEC does not have. Add antler restrictions which would work the same way causing a person to take a doe instead of that spike chasing a non hot doe. They're would be no need for checks and would please majority of people except those that like to shoot 1.5 year old deer.

     

    Disagree that earn a buck is any harder to enforce than any of their other regulations. Heck, they just put off entire WMU from buck hunting for the first 15 days and I'm fairly certain there were those not playing along. Things seem to change every year. How hard is it to not print a buck tag until a doe tag is filled? If you have to, charge an extra $5 to predesignated stores and DEC offices who you show the doe to. Cheaters will always cheat, but it could be done. 

  4. $120 at Field & Stream store (same parent as Dick's Sporting Goods, I believe). full platform, seat flips up. appears to qualify for free shipping. I don't see an oversize surcharge. 

     

    link to treestand

     

    If the link doesn't work, search for "Comfort Zone Side x Side Deluxe 2-Person 18' Ladder Stand"

     

    I got one of these earlier in the year and they are decent. The platform does come to the tree. I'm tempted to go the Sportsmanguide route because that stand is tax and shipping free and is bigger. Keep the info coming. Thanks again. 

  5. Walmart has one for 89$ good reviews on it too, dicks's sporting goods has one for 119 as well.

     

    Thanks, I saw these two stands and they are the type where the seat frame does not go flush against the tree. Unfortunately, thats a deal breaker for me. But appreciate the heads up! 

  6. If anyone stumbles on a good sale price, please share. Looking for a two man stands and the only real "must have" (other than price) is that the seat flips up and the platform goes all the way back to the tree so you can stand comfortably. 

     

    I see one in Sportsmanguide for $135 but I'd love to get them cheaper because I'd like to buy several. Thanks. 

  7. It blows my mind that this announcement and post does not WAKE hunters up. You posted 14 pages about how many don't see the deer like you want to, or looking for a new place to bow hunt etc, and right under your nose an announcement comes up (as was predicted) that an all out war to basically wipe out deer is next. Bend over, we're too lazy to do anything about it so get ready for phase 3. 

     

    So much for land values as I just purchased 257 acres and all it takes is one "stakeholder" to light up the fields in August and do just about anything they want. And you thought nuisance tags were bad?

     

    I'd love to see sportsmen organize and boycott buying licenses for a year or two. And the organizations that I thought would care (such as QDMA) appear too stumped about which food plot to plant next to care there will be few deer to eat at it. 

     

    Never mind we just had two record severe winters and numbers are clearly down. NY could have widespread EHD and they would move on with their proposal. 

     

     

    • Like 1
  8. One friend of mine started using it this year and so far he says he's seen a difference. Personally, I don't like the thought of carrying it or screwing it in to each location but I do feel it could scientifically work. But I also wonder about the safety of it. To the guys who say "play the wind"... I agree but even when you do often I let deer pass me who are eventually down wind so I'll do whatever is reasonable to remain undetected and largely I do. Deer used to "blow" and "snort" but very rarely do that now after a long routine of scent free tactics I employ. We as hunters buy some pretty elaborate equipment (from bows, to bullets, to scopes, and soaps that all have their place so it's kind of funny to hear people so quickly dismiss something that may some day prove effective. It's got to be better than the "deer view mirror" anyway lol (and no I did not buy that either). 

  9. Long time archer and gun hunter but never really had much opportunity to hunt with riffle. I now have a place in Livingston county and just curious if you riffle fanatics change your shot placement because of your riffle (mine a 270)? I've heard of the old timer neck shots, etc. I myself am a tried and true double lung broadside guy but just curious what shot you like to take with a riffle such as 270? 

  10. Bob is a great tracker and I've learned so much from him. And Thor is an awesome little dog! I joined deer search a couple years ago and have learned a ton and also have a dog learning. It's a free service but we do take donations and thats what keeps the club functioning. The absolute biggest thing I see in my short time doing this is two fold: 1) poor shot selection specifically 1/4 toward the deer hitting shoulder 2) Hunter loses the blood and continues to pursue the deer far too soon and jumping a deer that otherwise might die in it's bed over night. Bob is the one who taught me an intestine hit takes 18 hours to expire as compared to a true gut shot which takes 8. Thanks for sharing the great result. 

    • Like 1
  11. Lighted knocks solved this problem for me, now I know where my arrow hit!

     

    Which knocks do you use? Seems mine do not show up all that well in full day light. 

     

    I agree, WAY too many people push deer too soon and they never find deer they otherwise would have. 

  12. That is a fatal shot every time if you got stomach. Stomach will take roughly 8 hours so hopefully you did not push it after the shot. If it was not pushed, it is often within 200 yards. Go back tomorrow to search for body. Google search will give you alot of information on various shots. Best of luck. 

  13. I'm looking for suggestions on which brand of 100% waterproof jacket and pant you are happy with? 

     

    I'm looking for uninsulated bottoms that are "form fitting" so that they are not baggy and like a wet sack of potatoes when rained on. For the jacket, I'm looking for WARM which might require a layering system. This will be used for gun season and late ML season on out of state trips where you hunt regardless of the weather. 

     

    So far, I found an Under Armor jacket that is not bad (but it's $400) but many are that expensive. I've not been able to test the fit of their UA pants that are 100%wp. I also considered Nomad which looks like a nice pant but seems their jacket is pretty light. I was not a fan of the fit on Sitka waterproof pant.

     

    Thanks.  

     

     

  14. I'm pretty sure I brought my arm down instead of bending at the waist. I've been at the range throughout the summer and right before the season started and was hitting well. I didn't practice with the Treestand though. Maybe that's the ticket

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

     

    Lots of possibilities.

     

    What broadheads are you using and have you practiced to see if they are flying the same as your field tips at ALL of your effective ranges? 

  15. So are you saying when someone gets a picture of a nice buck, they must be baiting to get the picture? I don't see any evidence of baiting on the pictures posted on this thread. Why would it be suggested otherwise?

     

    No, not when someone just gets a picture of a nice buck. I just thought it was possible seeing that the buck seems to pose front and center, several different days, several minutes at a time between pics, from different directions, appearing to focus on the same spot. 

     

    I'm not trying to ruin any trail cam fun, but I'm also not a fan of hunting over bait (not accusing b/c I suppose anything is possible). Odd thing for me is that someone putting food out for early trail cam pics does not bother me (and I realize thats illegal too). But the thought of someone hunting over minerals or food does not sit as well. 

  16. Great pictures, especially the one with the second buck in the background of the big bucks rack. 

     

    Not trying to be difficult, but I'd be careful if there is a mineral lick type attractant bringing that deer in so consistently, especially if you are hunting near it. 

  17. I admit I didn't read all the posts, but it appears Doc is the only one who is seeing thru the DEC's ploy. They want to be able to say "well that didn't work, so now we must".... 

     

    Doesn't it anger you to sit here and be exploited? I can't believe the various organizations did not put up a more vocal stink about what the DEC is doing. 

     

    Can't wait for next years archery/ML season. And god help us if that doesn't lower doe to their satisfaction. 

  18. With so many different preferences, and some people trying multiple brands... I wonder how many people fall into the trap of not being sure how a particular broadhead fly's in their set up (or with their shooting form). 

     

    I'm not saying any of you would do such, but I've seen a hand full of guys in my day just put on broadheads and never do the hard part of being sure how they fly. (not all "100 gr" heads weigh the same and even some in the same packaging are different).

     

    I used to be so anal with fixed bh flight that I was toasting too many targets and too many arrows. For that reason alone, I shoot mechanical and I still test the flight thoroughly. I don't think there's a head on the market that does not kill a deer quickly when you put it in the lungs... not putting it in the lungs because of bad flight or shot is another thing. 

  19. I like it. Remember it's only certain parts of the state. It doesn't appear to affect the low doe areas. There's too many doe in my town, that I know.

     

    What many of you are missing is the DEC is effectively removing any accountability measures they currently have imposed on them. They want to get rid of the red tape so they can just nuke the nuisance (deer) any way they see fit and no one will be able to say a darn thing about it. Not to mention they are making nuisance permits easier and all things easier to get numbers to a pathetic level. The 15 days are smoke and mirrors, they want the ability to change regs easier in the future so they can NUKE. DEC is not the sportsman advocate here when it comes to quality hunting experiences. 

  20. Mr. Schiavone,

     

    I am submitting comments toward the proposed antlerless harvest and DMAP regulations, which are open for comment through June 29, 2015.

     

    I am opposed to the antlerless-only designation for the first 15 days of the early archery season within the wildlife management units (WMUs) that are included within the proposal.  I am also opposed to the antlerless-only modifications to the late archery and muzzleloader seasons within the same WMUs.

     

    There are many logical and scientific reasons for this opposition; however, here are some key factors that make the proposals a poor regulation to implement:

     

    1. Archery harvests represent a small fractional portion of the overall antlerless harvest across the various seasons and implements. This proposal eliminates opportunity for buck harvest, a major engagement to drive bowhunters into the field, while at the same time providing only a very minor increase in antlerless harvest. If a similar or in-kind proposal was made for the regular firearms season, this may be much more effective at attaining desired harvest levels. Additionally, with crossbow included in the back portion of the early archery season, this leaves roughly only 15 days with which vertical bowhunters have to harvest a buck without added hunting pressure.

       

    2. Muzzleloader hunting is a growing segment; however, such a regulation would likely limit this growth and may result in contraction of the muzzleloading hunting population. Some of the units within this proposal have recently moved to rifle allowance, reducing the use of muzzleloaders in the regular season where it was chosen over shotgun use. Pair this with zero opportunity for a potential buck harvest within the late muzzleloader season, there will be a reduced desire to go afield during the late season, a time where inclement weather is likely. It also will reduce the justifications for owning and hunting with a muzzleloader for many sportsmen and women with the implement only being used for late season hunting on does, a very narrow window of opportunity. The added emphasis on antlerless during this time may also increase the likelihood of bucks that have shed their antlers being killed.

     

    I believe the units that need antlerless herd reduction should move to an over-the-counter method of issuing tags after the initial DMP draw. This allows tags to be obtained by hunters who are able and willing to fill them rather than simply providing them en masse to the hunting population within those units. After the two DMPs are filled, hunters should be able to go to an issuing agent and obtain one or two supplemental DMPs, with the process repeating until the DEC deems that no added tags should be issued. Rather than having second-chance drawings and consignments, this method will remove barriers to those who have access, the desire, and the ability to harvest additional does. Removing the limitations on capping doe harvest  at the individual hunter level seems to be a plausible and reasonable management effort before making such drastic regulatory changes to the aforementioned seasons.

     

    Again, this change to over-the-counter is merely systematic; it does NOT reduce opportunity for sportsmen to take a buck for portions of the various seasons, and instead offers added benefits to hunter engagement and increases days afield for those who can fill the tags.

     

    In conclusion, I strongly oppose the antlerless-only designation for the first 15 days of the early archery season within the wildlife management units (WMUs) that are included within the proposal.  I am also opposed to the antlerless-only modifications to the late archery and muzzleloader seasons within the same WMUs.

     

    Thanks,

     

    Agreed ! 

  21. SUCH BS! Read carefully, this is like reading the Safe Act and it creates lots of loop holes for the DEC to just nuke deer to please "local stakeholders". They clearly have no interest in pleasing hunters and admit failure to control the herd to these stakeholders liking. I bet there were lots of lawyers involved in writing this so that they know later on they can legally make quick and rash changes to nuke deer and get away with it without accountability. 

     

    What really makes no sense is forcing doe harvest in bow season (this is a small segment of hunters) and even if that group arrows the heck out of doe, it won't dent things. They need to force the average hunter (the ones who flood the field for a couple weeks of gun season) to earn a buck and also for everyone to earn a buck. WHO CARES WHEN I SHOOT MY DOE? I'd happily earn a buck by shooting three doe and I'd get it done in the first few days or week. But to wait 15 days makes no sense. 

     

    I also love how none of this was in the earlier release proposed reg changes. 

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...