virgil
-
Posts
2699 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Hunting New York - NY Hunting, Deer, Bow Hunting, Fishing, Trapping, Predator News and Forums
Media Demo
Links
Calendar
Store
Posts posted by virgil
-
-
28 minutes ago, blackbeltbill said:
Any updates on this?
Probably on Tucker Carlson tonight- he may have been off for the long weekend. So, conspiracy theories get a break for a few days.
-
7 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:
Virg, am I wrong then? Are you saying the courts, back in'20, DID hear the 2000 Mules evidence that was just released this past May and didnt even exist ( not in a put together, analytical format / context, at least) when the court cases were heard (Late 20/ early '21)?
Your desperation is making you gullible. Do you actually believe that all ‘this evidence’ was collected and used to make a documentary, but nobody thought to use it to re-file a lawsuit?
You and Grouse can keep this nonsense going. I have stuff to do.- 1
-
5 minutes ago, diplomat019 said:
But have you seen 2000 mules?
No. But, I've read the posts of a few jackasses.
I've actually seen pieces of it- mostly fact check stuff.
- 1
-
18 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:
Not true; reason why the evidence hasnt gone anywhere (yet, cuz hopefully, the establishment will eventually do the right thing) is because theyre biased in favor of the Dems. They hated Trump and are glad hes out of office and out of power; their apparent attitude being, by any means necessary, even if that involves cvheating , which they clearly did. How do you know the evidence is silly, btw? Did you watch? yet
And Trust me, the evidence presented ih the film needs no legitmizing by me on a NY state hunting platform, cuz it be there!!
Nonsense. Many of the judges that heard the evidence were Trump appointees.
See, I just took the bait. Won't do it again. If you want to keep on with this nonsense, go ahead. You'll always have Grouse on your side, if that makes you feel better.
-
8 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:
V man, you disagree? how so?
I just find it funny that you keep referring to 'the evidence' of the 2020 election as having been obviously stolen. You seem to like trying to bait people into debating with you. Maybe you feel that it legitimizes the false claims. There is a reason that these silly accusations have not been able to gain any traction in the legal system. The only reason these nonsense claims still exist is because they are a proven winner in motivating voters and duping donors.
- 1
-
The fact that you two agree is enough for any reasonable person to know it's nonsense.
- 2
-
True the Vote
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThis article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (September 2020)True the Vote Formation November 30, 2009; 12 years ago[1] Founder Catherine Engelbrecht Purpose Preventing voter fraud Headquarters Houston, Texas, U.S. Official languageEnglish Website truethevote.org True the Vote (TTV) is a conservative[2][3] vote-monitoring organization based in Houston, Texas whose stated objective is stopping voter fraud. The organization supports voter ID laws[4] and trains volunteers to be election monitors and to spot and bring attention to suspicious voter registrations that its volunteers believe delegitimize voter eligibility. The organization's current president is Catherine Engelbrecht.
Since 2020, True the Vote has become known for its support for the disproven conspiracy theory that Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 United States presidential election was due to fraud. In the aftermath of that election, the group repeatedly claimed that they possessed evidence of widespread voter fraud in the election, and solicited millions of dollars in donations, but never released any evidence.[5]
Americans for Prosperity and other Republican-leaning independent groups have sponsored meetings featuring speakers from the group, including Engelbrecht.[6]
-
20 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:
Care to share your thoughts about my post Virgil?
You pretend to be open minded. You're not. There isn't anything that will change your mind. 2000 Mules tells you what you want to hear, so you happily believe it and accept it as proof that you are right.
- 1
-
25 minutes ago, ApexerER said:
Probably Putins fault
I think you missed the point.
-
Pathetic excuse for a pathetic post.
- 1
- 1
-
24 minutes ago, ncountry said:
Carefull do not let the truth get in the way of a good conspiracy.. The tinhats will come for you. Lol
What ‘truths’ are you referring to?
-
Yet another predictable and pathetic attempt to promote stupid conspiracy theories. All debunked nonsense started by and reposted by fools. The easiest thing to check, if you cared at all about accuracy, would be about the truck. It was a 2008 and was owned by his grandmother- the woman he shot in the face.
- 4
-
1 hour ago, Nomad said:
Really ? Imshort on time to research, but this popped right up .
Look at 2020 and beyond.
-
1 minute ago, Moho81 said:
I remember going to my kids pediatrician shortly after the SAFE act was put into law and we where asked if we had guns in the house. This wasn't our first visit either.
The Pediatric association recommends that pediatricians have conversations with parents about gun safety because guns are the leading cause of death in children. It is not a requirement.
-
11 minutes ago, Nomad said:
Hum I’ve been to two Drs here in the last month or so never saw that or been asked word one on guns , is that because I wasn’t admitted ,just an office visit ?
If you're not a new patient to that office, you probably wouldn't be asked. i believe it's usually included on intake paperwork for admissions or new patients. And, it is not a requirement that docs offices even ask these questions- as far as i recall. Some medical associations recommend that doctors discuss gun safety with patients. But, i'm not aware of any requirements.
- 1
-
I’ve been trying for Maine for a few years. Hoping once before I die.
- 1
-
-
Yet another pathetic attempt to create a conspiracy.
-
4 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:
Doesnt make it not credible, cuz it is- check it!!
I'm no more interested in documentaries by right-wing crackpots than i would be in one from a left-wing crackpot. You guys are funny. You love to talk about dishonesty in the media. But, when it fits your narrative, you eat it up with a spoon and regurgitate it out happily. This guy has zero credibility. If this is the best you can do, you're lost. You're making a fool of yourself.
- 1
-
That's funny. A documentary by a noted right-wing kook, who's been convicted of violating federal election law and pardoned by Trump in 2018. Excellent source.
- 2
-
26 minutes ago, diplomat019 said:
Joe Biden not being able to put together a coherent sentence is part of their plan? His own party members don't want his support for the midterms. It is looking like there will be a serious red wave coming soon. Now if there is a huge red wave and a 2024 Republican president elect, how can they be these geniuses that some some people prop them up to be?
This is the current boilerplate rhetoric to keep the base angry and active- 'the left is evil, and if the right loses an election, it can only be because it was stolen'. Heads we win, tails they cheated.
- 2
-
Booooo.
- 1
-
Crazy high temperatures forecast for this weekend. I’m planning to be at my place hunting. Do high temps effect turkey behavior?
-
23 minutes ago, Nytracker said:
Cool ... nice bear .... will you shoot it ?
Honestly not sure. Probably not. But I’d love to watch him from a treestand.
Roe vs Wade
in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
Posted
Good idea- and how about mandatory adoptions for anti-abortion folks.