Jump to content

virgil

Members
  • Posts

    2699
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Hunting New York - NY Hunting, Deer, Bow Hunting, Fishing, Trapping, Predator News and Forums

Media Demo

Links

Calendar

Store

Posts posted by virgil

  1. On 4/2/2022 at 3:30 PM, Robhuntandfish said:

    Backstraps are in the sous vide for 3 hours. First try with the sous vide. Will throw in a hot cast iron to sear afterwards. 29f3f545e93365391b6844942137edd7.jpg

    Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk
     

    How did this turn out?  I've had a sous vide for a while and haven't used it yet.  Was planning to do backstraps the same way on opening weekend of turkey.

  2. 3 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:

    Apparently, youre a late-comer to this thread, then cuz Ive posted some evidence/issues that -to many- are serious red flags.  The "audits" that you repeatedly cite as definitive proof of no voter fraud WOULD NOT CATCH the mass paper mail in ballot fraud  used enmasse in '20; nor would they catch a computer program designed to switch votes if it were internalized.     Now, I'm not saying that happened , but it COULD have happened .  You need to google some of the ways voting machines can- and are- hacked to obtain different results.  Youd be surprised at how easy it is to do for someone who knows what theyre doing.  And would a guy like Coomer be capable of such an enterprise? YUP.  That doesnt mean he did, of course, but considering his CLEAR bias and intensely strong dislike for the former PREZ, would I put it past him, or others of a similar bent? NOPE. 

    Ok, got it. Since every single possibility can’t be eliminated, that’s enough for you. You forgot to include martians in your list of possibilities- nobody has ever definitively proven that they don’t exist. They could be the perpetrators of fraud that you’re looking for. 

    • Like 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:

    Again, youre wrong- do you read yours?  This is the query from you that I responded to:

     

    I said no , did I not? Youre trying to overgeneralize here my friend, arguing that because I believe the election was fraudulent , that I am unwavering in that position and could never be convinced otherwise- NOT!! Thats why I responded to your post, because I absolutely could be convinced otherwise IF the evidence is there!! To date, it is not and I would argue that the reverse -as it stand right now- is actually true. 

     

    Read your own post Virgil!! I dont think that you do!! Im saying no to your query , not yes- youre wrong!! No, I would NOT continue to doubt the results!!!!

    Ok, I don’t want to keep going round and round on this. Just so I understand- you posted on this thread that you’re still convinced  the election was stolen.   Are you not aware of the 60+ failed lawsuits, the numerous audits and recounts that debunked those claims?  
    Assuming you are aware of them, what would it actually take to convince you?  

  4. 1 hour ago, Northcountryman said:

    Wrong- you asked me if I would contnue to doubt the results and I said no.  How is that a contradiction?

     

    I'm glad to see your response and it appears then, that we both agree.

    Do you read your own posts?  You have clearly stated on this thread that you still believe the election was stolen- in spite of the 60+ lawsuits that have failed as well as the audits and recounts that have proven the fraud claims were nonsense. 

  5. 21 minutes ago, Northcountryman said:

    Already answered- no. And if the situation were reversed and significant fraud was, ultimately uncovered and apparent, would you admit that the election was illegitmate ?

    You're trying so hard to play both sides of the fence that you're contradicting yourself.  You just stated that you would consider an election fair if it were determined that there was not enough fraud to effect the results.  Now, you're saying 'no'?  There's nothing that can convince you that an election is fair if you don't like the results?  Is that what you're actually trying to not say?

    As to your question, i have no trouble answering that if dozens of lawsuits, recounts, and audits determine that there was not enough fraud to effect the results, the election was fair.  If significant enough fraud to effect the results were found- not merely suggested by a bunch of wingnuts-  I'd have no problem accepting that.

    • Like 1
  6. To me, if the amount of fraud is significant enough to impact the outsome, then the election is certainly fraudulent; if not, though, then I would say it was at least "Fair" , if not honest- problem is, how does one know if the amount of fraud was significant enough to impact the outcome?

    And, if dozens of audits, lawsuits, and recounts prove that there was not nearly enough to effect the results of an election, you wouldn't continue to doubt the results?  

  7. 1 hour ago, New York Hillbilly said:

    Can't wait for Mr. Lindell to finally have an opportunity to present in court, everything and anything he has to finally prove his case or not. For the sake of our country, I think we all should want to know the truth. I for one will be surprised if they ever really actually open this door and give him, or anyone else the chance in a legal setting.

    Why would anyone risk their reputation, their fortune, and their life's work, if they were not convinced they were on the correct side of the issue and able to prove it?  And, what happens if he proves he is right? 

    The reason is simple. He’s a complete nut job. Extensive crack abuse causes paranoia. 

  8. 21 hours ago, Northcountryman said:

    Yup- agreed.  IMHO, , I think the Dems saw an opportunity to exploit '20 because of COVID and push mail-in as the primary MO for voting in that election  BECAUSE its so easy to cheat AND not to get caught. Moreover, when you have scumbags like Coomer -in a position of power in a Company like Dominion-who developed and designed much of the systems and their software and who held patents for voting systems with SEVERAL different companies , and with a CLEAR and profound left wing anti Trump bias, then I find it toally believeable that fraud may have been perpetrated. Depsite this guys repeated denials now , I , frankly do not believe him!!  Google this guy and youll see whast kind of man  he is- trutst me, he doesnt come off as overly trustworthy!!! 

    I'm sure you'll be interested to see what happens with Coomer's defamation suit against Lindell and all the other Big Lie proponents.  Defamation, as far as i understand, requires significant burden of proof.  Will it get rejected and tossed out of court as baseless like the 60+ suits alleging fraud?  Or, will it prove that Coomer was just a convenient scapegoat and that the whole Dominion angle was fabricated?  If he wins his suit, will you be swayed?    

  9. 3 hours ago, squirrelwhisperer said:

    This, I agree with 100%

    As to the 1st part of your retort, I think we will have to agree to disagree. 

    A. You cannot vaccinate against a virus, only bacteria. How many countless people do you know that get the flu shot only to get the flu?

    B. The media touted this as the cure-all. "Stay safe. Stay healthy. End the virus."

    C. There has not been enough testing. Who is to say that everyone that got vaxxed won't be dead in 2 years time? Is this going to be the next "If you or a loved one...." commercial? 

    We can all agree that this virus sucks. Most of us can agree that we were lied to about the vax. Maybe not you, but with respect, you are entitled to be wrong. :victory:

    Might want to google the difference between a vaccine and an antibiotic. 

    • Like 1
  10. 1 minute ago, Belo said:

    I usually go for middle of April to put in a blind or 2. I don't like turkey hunting out of a blind, but I do like 1 or 2 as "starter" spots. 

    Anybody set them up earlier or later for any reason? 

    i carry a lightweight curtain blind with me for when i hunt field edges.  It weighs nothing and makes it easy to pick up and move when i want to.

  11. 11 hours ago, chrisw said:

    "Sporting" is a rabbit hole. You're toting a 3" mag turkey load, decoys, several types of calls, roosting them the night before, a ghillie suit, a ThermaCELL and getting a picture of a bird is the non sporting part? To each their own, I admittedly don't put a lot of emphasis on turkeys as I don't find them all that interesting.

    Sent from my moto g fast using Tapatalk
     

    3 1/2"

    • Like 2
  12. I say use the cameras.  I'm no expert.  But, in my experience, the birds don't roost in the same spots each night- at least not on my property.  If nothing else, the cameras can help you get a sense of if/how many birds are on your land.  On my land, it's rare to find them in the same place two days in a row.

×
×
  • Create New...