LJC

I am pretty sure its less then that even tho I didn't use a arrow specific ballistic calculator because could not find one that goes that far

Yea I was thinking the same thing the animal looked like it was facing him but the injury looked like it came from a different angle. Im sure this guy is good but this looks fishy to me . And the video was definitely cut in length .

Don't take 140 yards shots at deer with bow no matter what the numbers are. That's what rifles are for . Get a proper hunting rifle if you want to do that .

Easton arrows was the source for 25 ft ib No not to arrows

If you have a stock sks they are not classified as asult weapons no pistol grip no detachable magazine. Those are legal as long as you don't modify them

Yep larry is 100 % right

Yes your right kinda of right depends I was talking about less then 75 yards anyway but the larger slug will still make a bigger whole resulting in a faster kill even past 75 yards it just will . The difference at even 100 yards in ft ib is negligible At 100 a 12ga 2 1/2 slug has 850/ 900 ft ib .223 has 950 ft ib at 100 yards A 3 inch slug has over 1050 ft ib The difference is the slug is going to make a .75 inch diameter hole in your deer and the little .223 is going to make alot smaller . Hole .223 Peniteration not going to make difference they both will go in far enough at 100 yards Bigger hole = faster death

Yes

Check this out tell me what you think Now go try find a balistic gel test of a .223 at close range that does damage like that . I watched a few and nothing comes close to this at close range That's all I'm saying Don't freak out on me body

Ok sparky just to make a point This one definitely was know spin shot notice the blood tell me a .223 is going to make blood lose that fast on a deer lol

So you think a .223 has as much stopping power as a 12ga slug at close range that was the point of this . Good luck with that use your AR then for deer lol you know it all what can I tell you

If you look doctor buckmaster the shot is low of the spin not in the spin but slugs break apart and it could of hit part of the spin with .223 you would have to be right on the money your margin of error is not near as big with such a small bullet .

So you did a forensic examination? I guess the fact that the wound Channel created by a slug is much larger then your little .223 bullet never crossed your mind did it

A shotgun is way better the .233 at close range there not even in the same ballpark and at farther ranges have fun trying to find that deer after you hit it with that .223 Could a .223 drop a deer like this that fast don't think so .

Just to let you know The .223 was designed to wound, not kill. On the battlefield the idea was you hurt one guy 2 others got to stop fighting you to help him out same concept with laND mines . Also smaller bullets means a Soldier can carry more ammo .

The ran over Bullwinkle that sucks

If im not mistaken farmers can get special permits to kill deer with 22 lr at close range at least that's what I heard . So obviously. 223 will kill a deer . But why not us something more powerfull and make sure you get a fast kill that is what you have to think about .

I been using the same bow for the last 20 years so I'm not a export on new bows if you can shoot you can shoot if you can't no amount of money you spend on a bow is going to make much of a difference I will tell you that much