Jump to content

Court Invalidates 30-Year "Eagle Take" Rule For Wind Farms


Recommended Posts

Good thing.

 

I've carefully reviewed the avian impact assessments for about a dozen wind projects in NY over the years. Most are inadequate or poorly done. Sometimes the studies are poorly designed. Often they will survey for migrants on days when they aren't flying. One assessment was especially egregious. The migration surveys were too few and on bad days. It was clear from the data that the surveyor could not identify raptors in flight. The whole thing was trash. A cynic might wonder if they were trying NOT to find raptors.

 

The scuttlebutt among some regulators was that the developer of the project with that horrible assessment - located in what I believe may have be the worst possible place to expose eagles to wind turbines in NYS (eagles: meaning both species, combined impacts) - was going to apply for a take permit for Bald Eagles.

 

That project was abandoned after our involvement. However, the assessment was done by an international company that has done this work for many wind projects. Considering the quality of assessments I have seen, the idea that FWS would issue eagle take permits for 30 years when many projects likely had inadequate avian impact assessments before construction is bizarre, even offensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...