Firearm Liability Insurance & 2nd Amendment Attacks

[Mr VJP]

Carolyn Maloney, Democrat from New York, has a plan. Maloney introduced a bill, back in May of this year: “The Firearm Risk Protection Act.” If this bill were to become law, a person would be required to have liability insurance to purchase a gun or face a $10,000.00 fine. The cost of that insurance would, of course, add to the overall cost of the firearm. But, then, the salient point of Maloney’s bill is to make gun ownership such an onerous, expensive proposition that the American public would be dissuaded from making the purchase of a gun in the first place. But, suppose a person is willing to tighten his or her belt and expend the money. What, then?

 

And;

 

The NY Times has pulled out all the stops with the latest incident in Oregon through a series of articles designed  to affect the emotions – not the intellect – of its readers. The October 4, 2015 Sunday edition of the newspaper is replete with articles – news accounts and editorials – by such ostensible “luminaries” as Frank Bruni and Nicholas Kristoff, who feel obliged or, perhaps, were asked, to weigh in.

What the NY Times news reports and commentary boils down to is this: since it is difficult if not impossible to ascertain with any degree of certainty who will become a “mass murderer,” the better course of action is to remove firearms from the American citizenry in totality, and in double-quick time.” What is the rationale for this?

 

Click on the link to read all of the article

 

http://arbalestquarrel.com/the-second-amendment-straight-in-the-crosshairs/

 

[chas0218]

Figures, anything to sway peoples decision against buying a firearm. Do most homeowner's insurance policies have liability anyway?

 

Have a petition to sign?

Edited October 28, 2015 by chas0218

[Culvercreek hunt club]

Have a petition to sign?

Absolutely. Swing in on November 1st 2016

[chas0218]

Absolutely. Swing in on November 1st 2016

Can't come soon enough!