Bballhunter11 Posted May 10, 2011 Author Share Posted May 10, 2011 Culver you are absolutely correct with that equation but that is what is called an ideal equation as it omits friction, which is where the 7mm surpasses the 30 cal,a 7mm bullet experiences less friction than the 308 allowing the 7-08 cartridges to start out with less muzzle velocity and still equal the same Energy on target as the 308 and allows you to use lighter bullets further decrease recoil. So velocity and bullet weight being being equal recoil will be the same but the 7mm-08 will actually hit harder on target than the 308. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 Good point Bball. look at these charts. 7mm-.08---last line 150 gr SP http://www.shootingtimes.com/ballistics/7mm_08_rem.html .308 ---17th line down 150gr SP with about the same muzzle velocity and energy http://www.shootingtimes.com/ballistics/308_winchester.html shows what you are saying with energy at distances. But I wonder how much difference there needs to be to actually "feel" a difference. i think we need a Hunting NY double blind field trial...lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bballhunter11 Posted May 10, 2011 Author Share Posted May 10, 2011 But we are also splitting hairs comparing these two calibers, isnt it something that we can come up with so much to talk about when two things only vary by 0.024". Now if we were to compare the dinosaur we all seem to shoot any way the 30-06, now there is a recoil difference hahaha. 7-08 shoots a tad flatter, and culver they are currently shooting 140gr loads out of the 7-08 with an upgrade to 160gr for the bear hunt. Looking at factory ballistics charts i think they also load the 7-08 low but maybe not i havent had a chance to shoot my handloads yet as my scope just arrived today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bballhunter11 Posted May 10, 2011 Author Share Posted May 10, 2011 hahaha was just looking at those same charts culver, pretty much identical characteristics there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.