Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tony Avella's Anti- DEC  mute swan bill (S-06589A and A-08790-A) passed both houses today and will be sent to the governor. All we can do is email Governor Andrew Cuomo and request he veto's the mute swan bills because the DEC knows more about managing wildlife than the humane society. 

 

This having passed both houses is now in the hands of the senate which can deliver it to the governor any time they feel. The governor would then have 10 days to either sign it into law or veto it. As of just now, the senate still has it. We need to IMMEDIATELY contact the governor and urge him to veto this proposal. This bill was expedited through the legislative process and finalized the very day before they all break for the year. The 17 sponsors in the Assembly and the 5 sponsors in the Senate made sure they completed this political favor for the animal rights organizations that endorse them before breaking until the fall!
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard the bill(s) were revised quite a bit, so I looked them up. I notice the bill was transferred out of the environmental conservation committee and into the rules committee were it was approved by over 20 assembly members, than back to the environmental conservation committee, with no voting info. Don't ask me - all I got from this so far is 20 Plus names who voted it out of the rules committee. Notice that they are going to require public meetings in EVERY town or area were mute swans are found??????????? Then "priority" will be given to nonlethal management methods - hard to extirpate a species with nonlethal methods, so the entire DEC agenda is perverted as far as I am concerned. I will follow up with the complete voting record of both bills, senate and  assembly members who voted for this  should be considered hostile to hunting and wildlife science. That is Anti-Hunting AND Anti-DEC....

 

http://open.nysenate.gov/legislation/bill/S6589A-2013

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 25 assembly members find the DEC more credible than anti hunters.. 104 other assembly members do not trust the DEC...

 

Here is How the Assembly voted on its mute swan bill:

 

A08790 Votes: BILL:A08790ADATE:05/29/2014MOTION: YEA/NAY:104/25

 

Abbate Y Corwin NO Glick Y Lavine Y Nolan Y Rozic Y Titus Y Abinant Y Crespo Y Goldfed Y Lentol Y Oaks NO Russell Y Walter NO Arroyo Y Crouch NO Goodell NO Lifton Y O'Donne Y Ryan Y Weinste Y Aubry Y Curran Y Gottfri Y Lopez Y Ortiz Y Saladin Y Weisenb ER Barclay NO Cusick Y Graf Y Lupardo Y Otis Y Santaba Y Weprin Y Barrett ER Cymbrow Y Gunther Y Lupinac Y Palmesa NO Scarbor Y Wright ER Benedet Y Davila Y Hawley NO Magee Y Palumbo Y Schimel Y Zebrows Y Blanken NO DenDekk Y Heastie Y Magnare Y Paulin Y Schimmi Y Mr Spkr Y Borelli NO Dinowit Y Henness Y Malliot Y Peoples Y Sepulve Y     Braunst Y DiPietr NO Hevesi ER Markey Y Perry Y Simanow Y     Brennan Y Duprey NO Hikind ER Mayer Y Pichard Y Simotas ER     Brindis Y Englebr Y Hooper ER McDonal Y Pretlow Y Skartad Y     Bronson Y Fahy Y Jacobs Y McDonou Y Quart Y Skoufis Y     Brook-K Y Farrell Y Jaffee Y McKevit Y Ra Y Solages Y     Buchwal Y Finch NO Johns Y McLaugh NO Raia Y Stec NO     Butler NO Fitzpat Y Katz NO Miller ER Ramos Y Steck Y     Cahill Y Friend NO Kavanag Y Millman Y Rivera Y Stirpe NO     Camara Y Galef Y Kearns Y Montesa NO Roberts Y Sweeney Y     Ceretto Y Gantt Y Kellner AB Morelle Y Robinso ER Tedisco Y     Clark Y Garbari Y Kim Y Mosley Y Rodrigu ER Tenney NO     Colton Y Giglio NO Kolb NO Moya Y Rosa Y Thiele Y     Cook Y Gjonaj Y Lalor NO Nojay NO Rosenth Y Titone Y    

 

Edited by mike rossi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The Senate was even worse, I don't see a single vote for the DEC.... Am I mistaken? There are about 65 senate seats, but some are vacant, this record accounts for 61 senators, I think that is all there is?

 

VOTE: FLOOR VOTE: - Jun 18, 2014
Ayes (59): Addabbo, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Boyle, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Farley, Felder, Flanagan, Gallivan, Gianaris, Gipson, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Hoylman, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Lanza, Larkin, Latimer, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Marchione, Martins, Maziarz, Montgomery, Nozzolio, O'Brien, O'Mara, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Sampson, Sanders, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousins, Tkaczyk, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Excused (2): Espaillat, Golden

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know all you need to do is call (518) 474-8390 then press 3 and tell the person who answers you are against S-06589A  and you want the governor to VETO  it. They will ask for your zip code and that is it, two seconds... Sometimes they cant find the bill by its number, if that happens just say it is the mute swan bill...

 

 

Lets not let them get away with this without a least hearing from a few hundred of us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is the wildlife oppressed by the swan don't contribute enough money to be consider important. They would rather protect a invasive species.

 

There is a complex layering of science, policy, and public opinion surrounding the issue. I disagree with you though. Mute swans impact everything from the smallest fish to very economically important migratory game birds and shellfish. They also add to the water pollution problem. The ecological services wetlands provide, like carbon sequestration, groundwater recharging, etc... alone are worth billions of dollars. Then add the value of the wildlife to the land.

 

Who do you mean by "they"?

Edited by mike rossi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I am being too gentle with someone picking a fight.. I get it, but you are wrong, the economy and conservation funding does not revolve around the whitetail... If you even read the DEC draft mute swan management plan, you would be aware of the negative economic impacts of mute swans..  Here are some reports, there are many more, including work done by the DEC,  citing the negative  ECONOMIC IMPACT of mute swans:

 

http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/bnatres/fishwild/pdf/muteswan.pdf

 

https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7-153-10370_12145_59132_59333-263394--,00.html

 

http://longpointwaterfowl.org/research/staff/past-staff-research/mute-swans/

 

http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/waterfowl/mute-swan/management-plan/virginia-mute-swan-management-plan.pdf

Edited by mike rossi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By mike rossi
      Details coming soon!
       
      As mourning doves expand northward Canadian Providences are instating hunting seasons. British Columbia has hunted doves for some time. Southern Ontario instated a season in 2014, and now Quebec. There is also a pending proposal in Manitoba and discussion elsewhere. 
    • By mike rossi
      Air Shotguns add a new dimension to dove hunting. Note the comment about the overhead utility lines, we are going to recommend the DEC prohibits dove hunting within gun range of lines to prevent damage to them. They are taking Eurasian collared doves, which are similar to our native mourning doves. They are spreading and it is not too uncommon to find this introduced dove across NY. The impacts of ECD are not known at this point.
       
      If you want to hunt doves in NY, sign our online petition at this link: http://nydovehunting.weebly.com/petition.html 
       
      For info on Eurasian Collared Doves go to this link: http://nydovehunting.weebly.com/eurasian-collared-dove-hunting-ndash-endless-opportunity.html
       
       
       
    • By mike rossi
      Upcoming movie pushes back against the anti-bird dog movement, recommended by the AKC: 
       
      http://nydovehunting.weebly.com/new-movie.html
    • By mike rossi
      Dove Hunting, Spying on Trapper's Convention, NAVHDA Bird Dog Training, and more...
      This page takes a moment to load... it's worth the wait.
       
      http://nydovehunting.weebly.com/anti-hunting-activity-in-new-york.html
    • By mike rossi
      By now you might understand the utility of the information we are sending you and why we are sending it to you. If you are still cursing us out or scratching your head because you are not quite there yet, please stick around! 
       
      Below is a summary we compiled which reflects the central premises of anti-hunting activists both in general and specific to dove hunting. (In the future we will adapt this to pheasant stocking, Sunday hunting, and young forest management).
       
      Categories of arguments are grouped and typical premises of each category are listed.
       
      For your convenience the same information is attached to this email as a pdf file which can be downloaded and saved to your computer.
       
       
      Catalog of Arguments Frequently used by Anti-Hunting Organizations and Activists
       
      Hunter Attitude and Behavior Arguments
       
      1. Lack of interest in retrieving doves.
      2. Hunters do not retrieve or eat doves but rather use them for target practice. Comments made by hunters, outdoor writers, and hunting spokespersons which reflect that or can be construed as such, are frequently quoted by anti-hunters and the media. 
      3. Dove hunting practices are cruel/inhumane/unethical/immoral/unsporting
      4. How hunting causes suffering to doves, for example wounding and not retrieving.
       
      Social Imbalance Arguments
       
      1. Expanding hunting opportunity will contract opportunity for non-hunting activities.
      2. Participation in hunting is shrinking and there is more revenue generated and greater participation in other outdoor activities. Policy should favor the majority.
      3. Expanding hunting opportunity will make NY less desirable for non-hunting recreation which will result in lost revenue for the state and local economies.
      4. The vast majority of hunters are middle aged or older Caucasian males.
       
      Power and Control Arguments
       
      1. Decisions should be made by majority rule (voting).
      2. Hunting policy is decided under a rigged system tainted by favoritism, politics, special interests, money, and abuse of power.
      3. State wildlife agencies mismanage wildlife to accommodate hunters because hunting license revenue is their primary source of funds.
      4. A pro-hunting culture exists within the DEC.
      5. There is no anti-hunting representation on the Conservation Fund Advisory Board and the Fish and Wildlife Management Board. At least one representative of the Humane Society of the United States should be appointed to these boards to represent the interests of the broader public, not just hunters.
       
      Public Participation Arguments
       
      1. Anti-hunters claim they are disenfranchised from the decision making process, the extent to which they are involved, the nature of their involvement.
      2. Lack of transparency of the decision-making process exists.
      3. Public notice was inadequate and therefore stakeholder participation was compromised. 
       
      Arguments about the reliability of population estimates, monitoring, and information about mourning doves.
       
      1. Science is not recent enough
      2. Quality of science is inadequate or questionable
      3. Need NY specific data
      4. Imprecise population estimates
      5. There is speculation surrounding dove management.
      6. NEPA requires ESA, EIS before instating a dove hunting season and/or similar action should be taken prior to considering a dove season. 
       
      Wildlife management is a failure/debacle
       
      1. Management of doves and other wildlife is not working/failing/ineffective.
      2. Animal-related problems are the result of human arrogance, intervention, manipulation or management.
      3. Hunting causes imbalanced wildlife populations.
       
      Dove Hunting is not biologically justified
       
      1. Management need does not exist because doves are not overpopulated or a nuisance species, therefore hunting is not biologically justified.
       
      Dove hunting will not generate conservation revenue or general economic activity.
       
      1. Flawed economic report (flawed because of gross misinterpretation of data)
      2. Participation in dove hunting does not require much money so it should not be allowed
      3. Dove hunters do not buy electronic dog equipment so the economic impact of dove hunting is insignificant.
      4. Dove hunting will only redistribute the effort but not increase license sales.
      5. Dove hunting will have an impact on ticket sales for concerts and basketball games thereby hurting the economy.
       
      Lack of meat
       
      1. A dove is too small to provide “sustenance”.
       
      Palatability
       
      1. Dove meat has a bitter taste that requires heavy marinades
      2. Crow tastes like wild duck and doves
       
      Doves as Symbols
       
      1. Christian
      2. Hebrew
      3. Pagan
      4. Military
      5. Pacifist
      6. Artist Picasso's painting of the Peace Dove.
       
      Public Safety
       
      1. Dove hunting jeopardizes the safety of non-hunters recreating outdoors
       
      Maintain the Status Quo
       
      1. Doves have not been hunted in NY for many years and that protection should remain in place.
       
      Assigning Characteristics to Doves
       
      1. Peaceful, innocent, helpless, loving, devoted, cute, etc.
       
      Incidental Take of Protected Birds
       
      1. Concerns are often raised about hunter’s ability or commitment to identify doves in flight
      2. Persons self-identifying as “experienced” bird watchers, or indicate they study birds for a living (including several artists who characterize their livelihood as “study birds for a living”) indicate they personally have misidentified stationary doves with binoculars, and assert that an error is more likely when discerning birds in flight without binoculars.
       
      Miscellaneous
       
      1. “I am not an animal rights extremist” “I am just a concerned bird watcher”.
      2. ‘I am a hunter, but I oppose hunting doves”.
      3. Orphaned chicks
      4. Compare mourning doves with the passenger pigeon.
      5.  Pb ammunition
      6. Hunters will shoot at doves flying near or perched on utility lines and damage them.
      7.  Writer indicates experience owning a dove or other bird as a pet, saving young birds.
      8. Writer advocates teaching children and/or adults about coexisting with wildlife, animals were here first, compassion for doves, reverence for all life.
      9.  Eating meat is unhealthy or bad for the environment.
      10.  Amount of money spent by both sides or the government in fighting the matter.
      11. Because I feed doves in my backyard people should not hunt them.
      12. Hunters already have enough species to hunt.
      13. Doves are the Farmer’s Friend because they control nuisance plants by eating seeds.
      14. New York State Assembly Rule 3, Sec 1(f) requires the Fiscal Implications of Legislation must be determined.
      15. Anti-hunters will often quote or paraphrase statements made by well-known persons, some of which were published over 120 years ago. The content of such statements is varied:  opinion, outdated science, and often speculation that did not pan out over time.
       
      Characterization of Hunters
       
      1. Real men do not hunt
      2. Hunters are cowards
      3. Hunters are feeble-minded
      4. Hunters are inbred
      5. Hunters are overweight or “paunchy”.
      6. Hunters are backwards
      7. Hunters are hicks
      8. Hunters are Caucasian males
      9. Hunters are an aging and dying breed that is going extinct, in with the new and out with the old!
      10. Hunters are drunks
      11. Hunters are non-athletic or “NARPS” – non-athletic regular person
      12. Hunters can’t fist fight so they need guns
      13.  Multiple contexts of physical inadequacy, sexual inadequacy/etc.
      14. Hunters have the “little man syndrome”.
       
      Core arguments-FD.pdf
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...