philoshop Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 It's Latin for " Who benefits?". It's one of the most basic legal and investigative questions. "Who benefits?". Trey Gowdy touched on this when he questioned James Comey today, and got some answers with respect to the allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. The intelligence agencies don't/didn't benefit from the allegations. The Trump campaign didn't benefit. The Trump administration is not now benefiting. The Hillary Clinton campaign didn't benefit. And I would argue, at this point, that the DNC didn't benefit at the time. So, "cui bono?" Who remains on the list of possible benefactors from this? Just something to think about. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted March 21, 2017 Author Share Posted March 21, 2017 I've posted this on a number of websites today where I normally get pretty vocal response, and lots of hatred from the left. Things have been very quiet, almost like everyone is waiting for their favorite talking heads to chime in before putting forth an opinion. It's a very simple question: "Who benefits from these allegations?" Watch the video again and pay close attention to Comey's reaction when asked whether James Clapper(DNI) and John Brennan(CIA) may have had access to the investigative material and/or the authority to declassify and disseminate that material. Clapper and Brennan still work very closely with the former Obama regime which seems to be reconstructing itself right down the road from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. I don't like conspiracy theories, but this is going beyond just theory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 I think the DNC and the Russians can indeed both benefit, if not directly. Russia can forge ahead with her own agenda, unbothered by an Administration that is tied up in dealing with all this nonsense on the home-front. Democrats get to practice the art of disruption until they can get another bite at the cherry. Directly. the deep State, the globalists, and the New Order neophytes buy time in terms of the engineering of society in their own image. They have been invested in this game for a hundred years now. I do not believe Russia is directly involved but I can seehow chaos here benefits her own geo-strategic goals. And of course the CIA have been a bunch of pro-commie Marxists forever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 The DNC is just a vehicle these days for Marxist social-engineering. They use politics, but are above politics in terms of their goals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Coup Plans Discovered Inside State Dept Obama Sleeper Cells Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chas0218 Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 On 3/20/2017 at 7:43 PM, philoshop said: It's Latin for " Who benefits?". It's one of the most basic legal and investigative questions. "Who benefits?". Trey Gowdy touched on this when he questioned James Comey today, and got some answers with respect to the allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. The intelligence agencies don't/didn't benefit from the allegations. The Trump campaign didn't benefit. The Trump administration is not now benefiting. The Hillary Clinton campaign didn't benefit. And I would argue, at this point, that the DNC didn't benefit at the time. So, "cui bono?" Who remains on the list of possible benefactors from this? Just something to think about. The media, they are the ones that ran with the story with ZERO proof, none, nada, zilch. It is sad that this even made it to the news stand. There has been no proof and the media is still talking about it. Nothing like reporting fake news to get your ratings. Pretty sad that we can't watch/listen to the places we all used to get our information because it has been twisted so much from the truth. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted March 24, 2017 Author Share Posted March 24, 2017 8 hours ago, chas0218 said: The media, they are the ones that ran with the story with ZERO proof, none, nada, zilch. It is sad that this even made it to the news stand. There has been no proof and the media is still talking about it. Nothing like reporting fake news to get your ratings. Pretty sad that we can't watch/listen to the places we all used to get our information because it has been twisted so much from the truth. You're certainly on the right track here. Now, think about who owns and runs the media. ;-] 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.