apoallo Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 (edited) I am looking at a remington 700 ADL at gander mountain it is a .270 and has a 22 1/2 inch barrel. I am looking to use it for target and deer from 200 to 400 yards. is that barrel length good or is 24 inch better. I want this to be a nice tack driver. opinions? comes with a Nikon pro staff scope for $479.99 Edited January 15, 2013 by apoallo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattBuffaloNY Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 If your only shooting out to 400yds with a .270, 22" will be plenty. That's a great gun, at a good price too. Snatch it up while you can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 479 is a steal.. dont think you will see if difference 1.5 inches shorter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve863 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 I thought the new ADL's come with 24 inch barrels these days? I myself like 22 inch barrels in the non-magnum rounds like the .270. Adding 2 inches to a barrel gives you a tiny bit more of velocity which won't make a bit of difference at any reasonable yardage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr VJP Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Barrel length has little effect on accuracy. Many short barrels are extremely accurate. Barrel length affects velocity more than anything. The only way to tell how accurate a rifle will be is to test it on the range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.