Commercial banned during the super bowl . . .

[Deerthug]

The wussies at the NFL rejected this commercial. I guess stuffing people's faces with Doritos and Budweiser are more important than protecting one's family . . .

 

 

 

[boo711]

My buddy posted this on facebook a couple weeks ago. I was kind of surprised, I thought it was actually a pretty good commercial

[132 eight pointer]

If the bowl was being played in Dallas the ad might have made it. There was a commercial rejected last year that was supposed to show Joaquin Phoenix pretending to drown in a tank of water,something to do with a fish suffering or some b.s. So I guess the network or NFL is trying to keep things uncontroversial.

[Five Seasons]

ok here's my .02.

 

That commercial is 62seconds, not your typical 30. do you have any idea how much that would cost? I could see maybe Remington or the NRA affording that...

 

Sounds maybe like this is a publicity stunt to help the company get free press. Well played if it is. If it's not... well the Superbowl has been rejecting pro-life and other controversial adds for years. This is nothing new. They have a right and I can't say I don't blame them as controversy will end up overshadowing the product. Wouldn't we be freaking if there were an anti-gun add? I say keep it to funny beer commercials.