Inland M1 carbine for Deer? .30 carbine ammo

[Culvercreek hunt club]

11 hours ago, chefhunter86 said:

One piece of misinformation here. It is perfectly legal to have a 15 or even 30 round magazine in your carbine... not for hunting. But because of the Age of the fire arm it is not governed by the safe act


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NO MAGAZINES IN NY OVER 10. Age of the weapon has no bearing on that portion. 

[Chef]

NO MAGAZINES IN NY OVER 10. Age of the weapon has no bearing on that portion. 

Wanna bet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Culvercreek hunt club]

19 minutes ago, chefhunter86 said:

Wanna bet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The only way it would be possible is if the magazine only fit that weapon that is older than 50 years and can be used in no other weapon that is newer than 50 years. The fact that they are making new ones that will fit the older magazines it makes those magazines a banned item.  For the average guys to be able to say that their magazine fits NO OTHER MODERN weapon might be a stretch. especially with some of the questions we see here. If that isn't the section you were referencing, please fill me in. 

[Chef]

It is a relic and legal... read the law


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Culvercreek hunt club]

14 minutes ago, chefhunter86 said:

It is a relic and legal... read the law


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe you should as well

23. "Large capacity ammunition feeding device" means a magazine, belt,
22 drum, feed strip, or similar device, [manufactured after September thir-
23 teenth, nineteen hundred ninety-four,] that (a) has a capacity of, or
24 that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than ten
25 rounds of ammunition,_or_(b)_contains_more_than_seven_rounds_of_ammuni-
26 tion,_or_(c)_is_obtained_after_the_effective_date_of_the_chapter_of__the
27 laws__of__two_thousand_thirteen_which_amended_this_subdivision_and_has_a
28 capacity_of,_or_that_can_be_readily_restored__or__converted__to__accept,
29 more__than_seven_rounds_of_ammunition; provided, however, that such term
30 does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and
31 capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition or_a
32 feeding_device_that_is_a_curio_or_relic._A__feeding__device__that__is__a
33 curio_or_relic_is_defined_as_a_device_that_(i)_was_manufactured_at_least
34 fifty__years__prior__to__the_current_date,_(ii)_is_only_capable_of_being
35 used_exclusively_in_a_firearm,_rifle,_or_shotgun_that__was__manufactured
36 at_least_fifty_years_prior_to_the_current_date,_but_not_including_repli-
37 cas__thereof,__

So based on this being a new manufacture item that accepts the old style magazines the magazines in capacity of over 10 are banned. 

[Chef]

If it's a new gun you are correct my carbine is wwii and so are my mags they are fully legal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Culvercreek hunt club]

10 minutes ago, chefhunter86 said:

If it's a new gun you are correct my carbine is wwii and so are my mags they are fully legal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you know what. Enjoy. 

Edited December 19, 2016 by Culvercreek hunt club

[Buckmaster7600]

Maybe you should as well
23. "Large capacity ammunition feeding device" means a magazine, belt,
22 drum, feed strip, or similar device, [manufactured after September thir-
23 teenth, nineteen hundred ninety-four,] that (a) has a capacity of, or
24 that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than ten
25 rounds of ammunition,_or_(_contains_more_than_seven_rounds_of_ammuni-
26 tion,_or_©_is_obtained_after_the_effective_date_of_the_chapter_of__the
27 laws__of__two_thousand_thirteen_which_amended_this_subdivision_and_has_a
28 capacity_of,_or_that_can_be_readily_restored__or__converted__to__accept,
29 more__than_seven_rounds_of_ammunition; provided, however, that such term
30 does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and
31 capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition or_a
32 feeding_device_that_is_a_curio_or_relic._A__feeding__device__that__is__a
33 curio_or_relic_is_defined_as_a_device_that_(i)_was_manufactured_at_least
34 fifty__years__prior__to__the_current_date,_(ii)_is_only_capable_of_being
35 used_exclusively_in_a_firearm,_rifle,_or_shotgun_that__was__manufactured
36 at_least_fifty_years_prior_to_the_current_date,_but_not_including_repli-
37 cas__thereof,__
So based on this being a new manufacture item that accepts the old style magazines the magazines in capacity of over 10 are banned. 

I would think that number 35 says its illegal, I wouldn't want my livelihood balancing on a judges verdict of what's in black and white over a stupid magazine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RomadRome]

So are y'all getting rid of your "high" capacity magazines?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Buckmaster7600]

So are y'all getting rid of your "high" capacity magazines?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

All mine were lost in a boating accident with a few rifles. It was a sad day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chef]

All mine were lost in a boating accident with a few rifles. It was a sad day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly!!!! But when I did have my carbine mags they were sold to me by a ffl in ny who said it was no issue


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Buckmaster7600]

Exactly!!!! But when I did have my carbine mags they were sold to me by a ffl in ny who said it was no issue

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The "MY carbine and MY mags" says otherwise. However the FFL that sold it to you wont go to jail and lose their right to own guns, you could.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Rattler]

Here's the real problem.  Let's say you have one of your 30 round M1 mags in your car when you get pulled over.  The cop finds it.  You WILL be arrested for having it.  Now you get to pay a lawyer tons of money to go to court and fight for your "right" to own it, hoping a judge agrees with you.  If you win, you're out thousands of dollars.  If you lose you go to jail for a long time and your right to own ANY firearm is now gone.

The SAFE Act was purposely written with these types of "Catch 22's" so gun owners would comply with anything the government says is illegal.  It's supposed to be so confusing, nobody will want to own any type of black rifle, for fear of legal government persecution.

I don't think your M1 mags are legal, but even if they are, you better not push the issue without a lawyer willing to defend you for free.

This meme sums it up perfectly: