Obama's after guns AGAIN

[ELMER J. FUDD]

He can have my guns as long as I get my free phone!

http://www.barstoolsports.com/chicago/super-page/this-chick-just-won-obama-the-election/

[Grouse]

A lot of gun owners think unless the government decides to knock on everyone's door one day and demand all the guns, they aren't trying to take them from you. Nothing could be more wrong. Laws are constantly being passed that insideously encroach on every aspect of your gun rights, to the point where it will be impossible to avoid breaking some gun laws just by owning one. If you don't show up on the government's radar when you break a rule, you will get away with it. But if you go through a divorce, get pulled over on the way to the range or hunting, or any number of innocent little things, you may find a cop telling you that you are under arrest for something you had no clue was a violation of the law.

Then if you are convicted of a felony, (which most gun law violations are) you will be heavily fined, possibly jailed, and completely stripped of your 2nd Amendment rights and all of your guns must be turned in to the court at that time. This is what happened at Ruby Ridge in Idaho as well as the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, TX. The government never expected these people to refuse to comply though, and because these cases blew up into national news, everyone heard about them. But there are hundreds of similar cases every year that you do not hear about because the victim of the law chose to comply, many times because the goverment offered to lessen, or even drop all penalities and fines, if they did.

What really slays me is MOST GUN OWNERS SIDE WITH THE GOVERNMENT WHEN IT ABUSES A GUN OWNER AND BELIEVE HE MUST HAVE BEEN A FELON IF HE GOT ARRRESTED AND CHARGED AS ONE BY THE GOVERNMENT. They have no clue how the gun laws, designed to strip gun owners of their rights, are really designed to work.

The government is NOT your friend. The government does NOT like gun owners. Gun owners better begin to wake up to this fact.

[sits in trees]

kinda funny how the NRA sides with the guy (Romney)who has done more to hurt gunowners rights than Obama ever did? Romney was quoted as saying he is proud of Massachusetts stricted gun laws(dont deny it i will post him on you tube vids sayin it) and even signed the 2004 assault weapons ban in that state. he has also fee'd and taxed the hell out of law abiding gun owners and hunters in that state. kinda makes me think that the NRA is full O crapolla???? and it doesnt really matter to the NRA what your record is on guns as long as your a Republicon, i believe the NRA has been bought and payed for.

and the only thing Romney can guarantee us now is that he will not sign any new GUN laws. the snake says nothing about ammo restrictions or mag bans, fees, etc, etc.

Edited September 29, 2012 by sits in trees

[Grouse]

The NRA has to support Romney, because in reality, he can not do anything anti-gun if the House and Senate are controlled by the GOP. He will also be pressed by the GOP to veto any anti gun measure if the House and Senate are controlled by Democrats. He is simply less dangerous than Obama. Obama WANTS to pass anti gun laws, while Romney has seen the error of those laws (if he wants to be POTUS) and no longer sees them as effective, and the GOP will be sure to keep him in line.

The NRA must analyze the reality of the choices and has to make the same decision the rest of us have to make. They also need to tell gun owners this info, because apparently there are still a lot of stupid gun owners in America who plan to vote for Obama. They also like to knock the NRA every chance they get. Romney is not a good candidate for gun owners, BUT OBAMA IS TERRIBLE!! The decision on who to vote for as a gun owner is obvious.

http://www.gunbanobama.com/