Jump to content

Landowner Protection Law


Arrow Flinger
 Share

Recommended Posts

As a landowner, here is the clause that still makes me a bit nervous:

 

"2. This section does not limit the liability which would otherwise exist

   a. for willful or malicious failure to guard, or to warn against, a dangerous condition, use, structure or activity "

 

basically what this clause means to me is that if you have an uncovered well, or hazardous ravine or maybe an old abandoned tree stand or old decaying buildings, or even an old ornery bull, or anything else that you have not guarded or warned against (perhaps even things that you cannot prove that you didn't even know about), the liability for such things still stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a landowner, here is the clause that still makes me a bit nervous:

 

"2. This section does not limit the liability which would otherwise exist

   a. for willful or malicious failure to guard, or to warn against, a dangerous condition, use, structure or activity "

 

basically what this clause means to me is that if you have an uncovered well, or hazardous ravine or maybe an old abandoned tree stand or old decaying buildings, or even an old ornery bull, or anything else that you have not guarded or warned against (perhaps even things that you cannot prove that you didn't even know about), the liability for such things still stands.

Probably the reason so many landowners don't let hunters on their property's, just isn't worth it to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's another aspect to legal problems faced by landowners when inviting people to use his land. Quite simply, being sued whether the suit is successful or not will cost the landowner some cash. Just being named in a suit will cause you to obtain the services of a lawyer. Should the suit go to trial, even if the landowner wins, he will have expenses that he wouldn't have faced if he had simply denied permission. And then of course there is always the possibility that the plaintiff will have hired a very slick lawyer, and they win the case. In that case the costs could be astronomical. It's so much easier for him to simply say "No."  That's probably why so many landowners are shutting the door in hunter's faces. You can show them any piece of paper you want, but the fear of the unknown, or the possibility that they simply are not interpreting what they are reading properly can convince them to take the "safe" road and simply deny permission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...