Leading Conservative found searching transgender pornography

[DirtTime]

20 hours ago, Rob... said:

You took the thread off topic. 

 

 

18 hours ago, Rattler said:

I did?  How so?

 With this comment:

 

 

 

Quote

 

I'm not really aware who Jones is and don't follow any of his shows, but I'm an American who believes everyone has the right to due process and should never be condemned until given due process.  America has become full of folks who make a good living running vicious smear campaigns.

The hypocrisy comes from those who believe they are without sin, yet gleefully cast the first stone, and pass judgement as if they are the almighty.  Bearing false witness is also a crime when done in court under oath.  Judge not and you shall not be judged.  Nobody can say for sure what happened here, but some are quick to say they're sure.  Better hope some degenerate pervert never gets their hands on your phone.  Someone quick to judge may see it and do the same to you.

Some people get most of their exercise jumping to conclusions, running down others, side stepping responsibility and pushing their luck.

Like mentioned, you claim to not know who Jones is, yet could not resist getting involved in a political discussion about him, just to argue. That's my opinion anyway.

There are no conclusions to jump too, no one is running Jones down, and the only "side-stepping" is by Jones himself. As is coming out in the wash now. He's a hypocrite, plain and simple.

 

I don't care if people watch porn, and I couldn't care less what their preference is. Just don't talk $hit then get busted doing what you mouth off about and bash with vigor. It's just that simple.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Rattler]

I don't see anything off topic in that comment.  You don't seem to understand it's relevance. 

You are all passing judgement based on slim evidence without any benefit of the doubt.  I don't follow Jones or really care about him, but I'm firmly against this type of social media condemnation against anyone based on such shoddy information.  Today, trail by social media is used quite often to attack lots of people's opponents to shut them up.  It's a vicious form of 1st Amendment suppression.  Is it just coincidence this happens to this guy right after he's been removed from the majority of online sites?  I suspect not.  Just my personal opinion, but I'm really quite alert to this type of modern day lynching, and I vigorously oppose it no matter who it happens to.

That's how the post is right on topic.

[DirtTime]

5 minutes ago, Rattler said:

I don't see anything off topic in that comment.  You don't seem to understand it's relevance. 

You are all passing judgement based on slim evidence without any benefit of the doubt.  I don't follow Jones or really care about him, but I'm firmly against this type of social media condemnation against anyone based on such shoddy information.  Today, trail by social media is used quite often to attack lots of people's opponents to shut them up.  It's a vicious form of 1st Amendment suppression.  Is it just coincidence this happens to this guy right after he's been removed from the majority of online sites?  I suspect not.  Just my personal opinion, but I'm really quite alert to this type of modern day lynching, and I vigorously oppose it no matter who it happens to.

That's how the post is right on topic.

And you are passing judgment on those who think Jones is a hypocrite! See how this circle works? 

[Rattler]

If you are passing judgement on someone based on circumstantial evidence, I think you are being judgemental, yes.  I'm not judging you, I'm judging your actions.  See the difference?

Besides, some on here have said he had it on his phone and enjoyed it.  How do you know he enjoyed it?  Isn't that an assumption and jumping to a conclusion?

Unless I hear him admit to it, I say reasonable doubt is what is needed.  If you have posted your opinion on the man already, there is no doubt to consider at all.

 

[DirtTime]

14 minutes ago, Rattler said:

If you are passing judgement on someone based on circumstantial evidence, I think you are being judgemental, yes.  I'm not judging you, I'm judging your actions.  See the difference?

Besides, some on here have said he had it on his phone and enjoyed it.  How do you know he enjoyed it?  Isn't that an assumption and jumping to a conclusion?

Unless I hear him admit to it, I say reasonable doubt is what is needed.  If you have posted your opinion on the man already, there is no doubt to consider at all.

 

I didn't assume anything! Make sure you have what I have said about Jones in the past, and what I said now correct. I also said I don't give a rats ass what porn people look at. But if you want to the mouth of to the alt/extreme right, don't bash the gay community while you are looking up tranny porn. You just don't get the circle. Jones got busted, and the alt/extreme right can't deal with the truth. Why do you keep arguing with me? You like to look at facts, so go look at the BS Jones has spewed, then look at how even me, on the Right, think he's a hypocrite, and laughing at him.

Edited September 1, 2018 by Rob...

[Rattler]

I rest my case.

 

[Hunter007]

Its Staged he probably did that to get media coverage or the liberals that hate him sent  him a viruses .   btw alex jones describes himself as a libertarian not a conservative. 

He is a  pot head .

The guys show is like watching the WWF more then a talk show lol 

Edited September 1, 2018 by Storm914

[Rattler]

Just for the record, I do not consider my posts here to be arguing.  I consider it debating.  To me, a very intelligent, civil debate, between two or more intelligent, informed individuals, is the best way to expose the best points on both sides of any issue.  That allows for conclusions to be based on information considered from both sides.  One's mind has to be open to possibilities though.  It's not a contest.  There is no winner.  It's about seeking the truth.

Arguing is infantile. 

[DirtTime]

19 hours ago, Rattler said:

Just for the record, I do not consider my posts here to be arguing.  I consider it debating.  To me, a very intelligent, civil debate, between two or more intelligent, informed individuals, is the best way to expose the best points on both sides of any issue.  That allows for conclusions to be based on information considered from both sides.  One's mind has to be open to possibilities though.  It's not a contest.  There is no winner.  It's about seeking the truth.

Arguing is infantile. 

But you are not well versed in Jones' propaganda, so any debate is like talking to a tree in the magic world of fantasy or right wing extremists. Carry on thought, the more people post on this thread coveting Jones the harder I laugh!

I am off to talk about hunting, something Jones knows nothing about.

[DirtTime]

I want to bring up infantile, 70% of the people people who don't get what this forum is about are "Infantile", it's about gun laws, not that you had a seizure because you pissed their pants in anger because someone didn't agree with you.

Edited September 2, 2018 by Rob...

[DirtTime]

Carry on people, it's hunting season. Lets see some pics of you in the woods, not not just talking in the political section.