-
Posts
7509 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
227
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Hunting New York - NY Hunting, Deer, Bow Hunting, Fishing, Trapping, Predator News and Forums
Media Demo
Links
Calendar
Store
Everything posted by Grouse
-
Joe Biden is infringing on Americans' Second Amendment rights yet again as he plans to sign another executive order targeting firearms. According to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Biden's order will target gun dealers who break the law in an effort to move "the U.S. as close to universal background checks as possible." Biden's EO directs Garland to clarify who is "engaged in the business" of selling firearms. As an administration official explained: "Number one, to make it clear that those who are willfully violating the law need to come into compliance with the law and, number two, to make it clear to people who may not realize that, under that statutory definition they are indeed in the business of selling firearms, they must become federally licensed firearm dealers and they must run background checks before gun sales." The order is also reported to include a "safe storage" directive. One thing's for certain: This is not about keeping Americans safe but about expanding the government's control over law-abiding Americans and shrinking their freedom.
-
-
-
When you are being attacked and getting your head handed to you, the last thing you want to do is tone it down. Any GOP candidate not willing to take on the insanity of leftist progressive Marxist totalitarian Democrats, will not be doing America any good. Whoever the GOP nominates, they better have the guts Trump has, or they won't change anything.
-
Fighting a Losing Battle
Grouse replied to Steve D's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
A NY resident is barred from doing a private transfer with anyone, even a resident of another state. Other states may allow their citizens to do private transfers with other citizens of their state, but NY makes it illegal for a NY resident to do a private transfer with anyone, anywhere. -
Political humor
Grouse replied to Water Rat's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
-
-
Political humor
Grouse replied to Water Rat's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
-
Political humor
Grouse replied to Water Rat's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
-
Political humor
Grouse replied to Water Rat's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
-
1940's
-
More attempts at gun control
Grouse replied to Grouse's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
Constitution ruled unconstitutional In 2021, Missouri Republican Governor Mike Parson signed into law a bill dubbed the Second Amendment Preservation Act. The law aimed to protect Missourians' Second Amendment rights from potential infringement by the federal government. The Biden administration sued, and on Tuesday U.S. District Judge Brian C. Wimes, a Barack Obama appointee, ruled that the Second Amendment Preservation Act was an unconstitutional breach of the supremacy clause, which elevates federal laws over state ones. However, the Constitution and Bill of Rights protect individual rights the federal government cannot outlaw. -
More attempts at gun control
Grouse replied to Grouse's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
We live in the first state to outlaw owning something that only serves a self-defense purpose with absolutely no offensive purpose. SAFELIFEDEFENSE.COM/ARMOR-BAN -
Michigan 1930's
-
Bradford County, Pennsylvania during the great depression.. Circa early 1930's.
-
If the government protected the right to bear arms the same way they protected the “right” to an abortion you would see: 1) Guns and gun safety taught in schools 2) Schools would hand out bullets 3) Children as young as 14 could buy guns without their parents knowledge or consent 4) No restrictions on gun sales regardless of mental illness 5) No registrations on gun sales 6) Gun store clerks would tell customers how to violate any gun laws 7) Gun control advocates wouldn’t be allowed to protest within 100’ of gun stores 8. There would be laws against the media publishing the names of gun owners. More children (people younger than a month old) are killed by abortion than guns.
-
Fighting a Losing Battle
Grouse replied to Steve D's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
However the deal was done, every aspect of it is already illegal. Maybe years ago it was OK, but not anymore. -
Fighting a Losing Battle
Grouse replied to Steve D's topic in Gun and Hunting Laws and Politics Discussions
Universal background checks present two problems. One: It requires info on the specific gun transferred to be recorder. The current NICS check does not. Collecting all the gun info creates a gun registry. That's something the govt is explicitly prohibited from doing. Second: It allows the govt to add all sorts of reasons to deny you the right to buy a gun and fail you with a background check. A "Red Flag" accusation that's revoked could stop you, or a DUI, false arrest, mistaken identity by someone with the same name or similar name, a court approved exoneration of a conviction the local prosecutors office fails to remove from FBI records, your gun hating Dr. claims you are physically unable to shoot a firearm safely, etc., etc. Many of these things already happen to violate a person's gun owning civil rights. Anti-gun politicians are just chomping at the bit to start adding more ways to fail you during a background check. Forcing everyone through a NICS check for ANY gun purchase, or even ammo now, as we see about to happen in NY, literally turns your Constitutional right into a government granted "privilege". When you really look into UBC's, you can see far more danger than any increase in safety that is promised. People rarely give up their freedoms without buying into some form of deception. UBC's are a deception. -
873 lb black bear 1943 Michigan