bubba

Off topic but I do not know where you get your news, but the reps seem to bend over backwards to compromise, but keep hitting a wall.

I am against it. I do not need everyone looking to kill a second buck traveling to my area. I prefer it the way it is

That system as far as the JP goes is very closely monitored. Big Brother knows when you log in and what you access when in there. I had no reason to look anyone up that I was not going to be seeing in court. I was in for almost 9 years. I resigned because of the safe act and my strong feelings about the law. I felt I could not be publically standing up against it and be presiding over cases where it could come into play. I would not convict anyone who was accused of a violation, which made me biased, and unfair. So I resigned. I also quit well actually retired from a great state job as I did not want to be associated with the mental health system any longer due to the safe act. This last November no one ran to fill my spot. In my township we have two jp's and now one is handling it all. I have been asked to reconsider and be appointed now until November and run again. I am considering it, but still on the fence. I feel the same about the safe act and the laws associated with it, so I am not sure. I will say that any DEC violations that came in front of me, I was very hard on them as I feel as strongly about that. I know every jp has their biases and hit some aspects harder than others, but I was saying in public no one would eb convicted in front of me unless it was a jury trial.

I never ask for anything. Then I am never disappointed

so you respond by accusing me of the same thing. How original

Oops I better get going. walmart has lives on sale. I need ot get down there before they sell out.

correct. when I resigned my post, my access was closed out. When I run again this fall and win, I will have access again. When I was a justice all it took was a look up on a computer database to see what background someone who was to come in front of me had. I had to look up on one place for prior criminal history and another entire place for dmv violations and any points. That being said if I were to be caught looking up anyone who was not to come before me, I could have been charged myself.

And as I stated before, I have a great life no need for another one. Where in the hell are you coming from with this one? I guess people go off on a tangent of their own and I need to get a life. I still think your name was on this list or could be on a list and that is why you are so against it.

I got that information when I was a justice. it is not open to the public. It is in a database the police officers and courts have access to

as usual you want to turn this into a pi^&%ng match. If you think 3 bucks will do it, good luck with that. I never said track offenses, I said to track the points. How would fine revenue increase by adding points to already occurring offenses? Again talking about it here and trying to do something about it are two different things. With my past experience, I think I do know a little more about this than you do. I know exactly how to find out of a person has a previous offense. that is quite different that tracking points. I would have to contact DMV to get that information, not look up someones criminal records. They are tww entirely different data bases.

first of all it was tongue in cheek second if you want this go to the legislature. they can do it. however be prepared for license fees to go up as they will need a lot of staff to track it and keep track of it all the same as the dmv does

No worries the legislature will make it soon so every dec violation regarding hunting will be loss of hunting privileges and of course gun confiscation.

well since there are so many out there who want to take our guns, posting my name and address I feel puts my family is danger. Posting a list of dec violations and fines puts no one in danger. Huge difference there

So I guess since the fines are minor, you can again justify breaking the law for your own sake.

Hell, I will post it every month from now on.

Well the reason I posted it was because it was to show those who think the laws are not enforced that you can be caught hunting after LEGAL hours and are above the law. I have heard so many times that it is not enforceable and who cares etc etc etc. Responses like yours are exactly why I posted it.Even when it is right in front of people they still deny it. By the way I have a great life. No need to get another one. As far as the fines, as the judge, you have a book with the fines listed. There is a range of minimum to maximum. Do not like how low they are, go after your lawmakers in Albany to increase them. They hold that job.

My bad. I never used pellets I know that pyrodex pellets were like that.

judge discretion

Are you sure you are putting the pellets in the correct way? On end is darker and that is black powder on them to make the pellet ignite. Dark end goes in first.

http://www.newzjunky.com/record/dec_violations.html read the next to last one.

Like I said I take it from what I read on here. Just repeating what I read. Everything I posted came from posts on here. Bottom line wear what you want, and I will wear what I want. Simple as that. And you wonder why hunters get a bad name. I have no desire to go to the SZ and deal with the Orange army as I have read on here. I havew no desire to go to the SZ to be shot at and trampled by other hunters. Those opinions areas I said based on what I have read here. I was had to hunt in places like that, I would not hunt.

So I guess you are saying everyone who posts that stuff is lying just because where you hunt it does not happen.

Know what I base those statements on. What everyone on here types. that is what my opinions are based on. I read how shots are fired from before daylight to after dark. I read about having to hit the ground as bullets fly over your head. I read about 5 shot volleys over and over again. I read about drives with many people. I hear over and over brown is down. You tell me what conclusions one is to draw from that.

It is criminally negligent homicide not reckless and it should be at least 2nd degree. There is no excuse for it except the dead guy was not wearing orange I guess.

MEMORANDUM FROM: Mike Jankowski, Wayne County Clerk DATE: December 2, 2014 RE: NYS Police presentation on the SAFE Act Enforcement On Tuesday November 18, 2014 at the Winter Meeting of the New York State Association of County Clerks the State Police conducted a presentation on the recertification process required under the New York State Safe Act. Representing the State Police were: Lt. James Sherman Tim Mylos Lynne Rosenzweig Points of Interest: 1) A pilot of the recertification process will begin in January of 2015. 2) The Pilot Counties will be Albany, Schenectady and Fulton. 3) 500 invitations to recertify will be sent out to each of the pilot counties. 4) The invitations will direct the permit holders to a state police web site or where they can download the recertification form. 5) There will be no county seal or any other county identifier on the letters to be sent out. 6) The invitation will be to recertify immediately although recertification is not required prior to January 31, 2018. 7) Recertification letters will be sent out state wide to selected groups between March-June 2015. The Goal of the State police is to have as many people recertify electronically as possible. 9) Paper forms will be available for download or from the state police website or at all trooper barracks. 10) Once approved the State police will issue a plastic recertification card that will need to be carried with the permit at all times. 11) The recertification web site will only available to individuals who have already received an invitation to recertify with a user id and password. 12) The paper forms can be filed by anyone at any time. 13) The applicants home address will be checked against DMV records. 14) Out of State addresses will be sent to the licensing officer. 15) Any permit holder that does not have a valid NYS driver’s license or ID will be required to get one. This includes out of state residents that are permit holders. 16) Electronically there will be a save function so the recertification can be complete during more than one session. 17) Re-certification is a state police function. The County Clerks do not have a role. 18) Counties will be notified when recertification is approved. 19) Recertification discrepancies must be corrected by amendment to license at the county level. Applicants will be instructed to do so. 20) When a permit holder recertifies online they will be able to print out a receipt with a tracking number. That tracing number can then be used to check where the application is in the process. 21) If the applicant recertifies by mail they will receive a return receipt with a tracking number. 22) Lt. Sherman did not encourage the use of certified mail but it would be a proof of mailing an application and proof it was received. 23) The recertification application is just like a pistol permit application without the references. The applicant is required to list all arrests, drug or alcohol treatment, mental illness or family court petition or charge. 24) The applicant lists all hand guns registered to him and this information may need to be reconciled with the state data base. 25) There are four steps to the recertification process: a. Submission of application b. Acceptance of the application c. Review/ Return for correction d. Approval/Revocation 26) Once submitted, the recertification application will be checked against the following data bases: a. NCIC’s b. MHL/946 c. Orders of probation d. DMV e. Parole f. Probation g. NYS wanted and missing 27) If the applicant is negative on the above checks the application is approved and the recertification cards will be issued. 28) Positives will be referred to the licensing officer for revocation or clarification 29) If the NYS Police determine that it cannot re certify the permit, the recertification is sent to the licensing officer. (Lt. Sherman indicated that a permit holder will have his entire application reviewed by the state police and the application may be referred to a licensing officer for further review even if the information disclosed on the recertification application is the same as the information provided in the initial pistol permit application. This is not limited to Federal prohibitors. 30) The Licensing officer does not have the legal authority to do anything other than revoke if there is a federal prohibitor. 31) The licensing officer would be responsible for getting a certificate of relief from disabilities for past problems that are not covered by the federal prohibitor list 32) There are three letters that are possibly sent to a permit holder seeking to recertify the pistol permit a. Letter calling for re certification b. Letter stating permit problem to be resolved c. Letter granting recertification 33) After January 31, 2018 the law states that the failure to recertify is an automatic revocation. Likely it will fall to the licensing officer to actually revoke the permit. 34) There will be a check box on the recertification for a co-registered weapon. 35) Applicant has the option to have the information on the recertification application exempted from public disclosure. 36) According to lt. Sherman the object of the recertification process is to create a “Pristine” data base that any law enforcement official would be able to access at any time with real time information. 37) Lt Sherman stated that the pistol permit data would be linked to the DMV data base and an officer would know a pulled over vehicle was owned by a pistol permit holder. 38) Indicating a pistol permit on the face of a driver’s license is not a decision that has been made yet. 39) Their goal is to send out the first recertification letters state wide by early spring. 40) There was a power point for the presentation but Sherman said it would not be released to the clerk’s.