Northcountryman

Agreed- that is the crux of the matter, isnt it? For the majority of people (I think) , human life begins after the first trimester , perhaps even as late as 15-16 weeks; after that point, it is, indeed a person and should be treated as one.

Oh, I didnt see that one; oh, ok, so youre saying the oil companies are losing $ right now? How do you know?

I think that it would benefit all of us if our domestic oil production and market was restored to the robust level that we enjoyed under the Trump administration. During that time, gas prices were 1/5 of what they are today and theres a reason for that!!

Depends upon what constitutes being "over" in terms of their future. Thats a bit of a false equivalence because all participants ,in your scenario are born and have been for many years living their lives. Certainly, anyone in a civilized society that takes a life , whether wittingly or not, must be held accountable in some way- they should, however, be given a fair chance at redemption.

Interesting example; are you suggesting a scenario in which the Mother wants and the Father does not? Does he have rights to insist upon abortion, then? Hmmm....

Great story !! No, it should not be; great example of a situation in which first trimester abortion could be applied without prejudice IMHO. However, if she waits till past that, then we have a problem.

Germany doesnt have the benefit or option of utilizing its own oil reserves cuz it has none- we do!! Thats why this mess is absolutely , unequivocally Biden's fault !!

Not sure about that, but It's a good question, aint it?

I'm a first trimester guy , myself; I think that abortion should be allowed within thatie frame without conditions; after that time has passed, should be harder (but not impossible) to obtain.

Yup, he is !!

Sorry , not gas tax ; gas prices , i meant.

But you’re avoiding the real issue here . What role does The Biden administration have to play in this gas tax mess would you say ? ( Not really a baseball guy , myself , but thoroughly enjoyed your use of them in your repartee with Grouse )

Come on now, Lefty- youre deflecting!! Trump again?? Enough with Trump!! Whos the President now?? What Exxon CEO called Trump an effiing moron ?And How does that relate to the current convo about the Chevron CEO calling out Biden for implementing incredibly hostile anti oiland gas policies that are driving millions of American households to financial ruin?

Not likely, cuz Trumps a stud , but Depends upon the jobs, I'd imagine .

Lefty Baby, let me ask you: do you think the Oil Exec is being too sensitive? Or, is Biden and his administration so far out of touch that thats all they can up with is reply? Serious question for you conmsidering the fact that you claim to be Conservative yourself

Notwithstanding the question of authenticity surrounding the whole Brice Cromwell letter, pretty sure this one is real: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/chevron-ceo-says-biden-should-stop-criticizing-big-oil-calls-for-change-in-approach/ar-AAYIcuq?ocid=uxbndlbing A quote from the letter by Mr. Wirth: "Your administration has largely sought to criticize, and at times vilify, our industry," Wirth said in a letter to Biden. "These actions are not beneficial to meeting the challenges we face." This about says it all, I think in regards to the business climate for Oil/Gas the Biden administration's created

Maybe an oil Executive at some level writing under a pseudonym ? Might make sense considering todays political climate .

See, I learn something new from you , yet again, Lefty! Never heard of this "The Mendoza Line" reference; what does it mean?

FYI- Just did a google search on all Election lawsuits filed regarding '20 Presidential election; from what I can see, nothing appears to have been filed since Feb of '21

Sorry, dont know why the other quotes popped up , too

Im asking you if the evidence that was compiled for 2000 Mules was presented to the courts last year and was dismissed- was it? Nope!! Do you know if anyone has re-filed a new lawsuit based on the new evidence that -post original lawsuit case- has since come to light?

Virg, am I wrong then? Are you saying the courts, back in'20, DID hear the 2000 Mules evidence that was just released this past May and didnt even exist ( not in a put together, analytical format / context, at least) when the court cases were heard (Late 20/ early '21)?

They didn’t see ( or hear ) this evidence - you’re wrong . That wasn’t available back in ‘20

And who are the “jackasses “ you’re referring to? Well, with all due respect , youre opinion doesn’t amount to all that much if you haven’t taken the time at least to watch it , now , does it ?

Not true; reason why the evidence hasnt gone anywhere (yet, cuz hopefully, the establishment will eventually do the right thing) is because theyre biased in favor of the Dems. They hated Trump and are glad hes out of office and out of power; their apparent attitude being, by any means necessary, even if that involves cvheating , which they clearly did. How do you know the evidence is silly, btw? Did you watch? yet And Trust me, the evidence presented ih the film needs no legitmizing by me on a NY state hunting platform, cuz it be there!!