Northcountryman

Sweden? Wow Lucky you- I'm jealous!!!

Ok, I think we should take a break and all go fishin !! What you say Lefty? I caught 2 nice Rainbows over the weekend , hbu?

Correct- that fact, in conjunction with the cell phone data tracking these Mules from NGO to > ballot boxes(necessarily, accdg to the "Mule" delineation criteria), looks awfully suspicious and cannot be explained as merely "innocent" coincidences- no way.

You are correct about 1 thing , my friend: I do need to see the hearings in order to be better informed what the other side is saying!! However, in this case at least, 1 (me not watching the hearings) clearly has nothing to do with the other (the accuracy/validity of the conclusions drawn from the makers of 2000 Mules), so anything learned from watching the hearings still will not lessen the impact of the evidence of election fraud uncovered in the documentary- so you should watch it :).

Nor am I; it is the evidence presented in the documentary that does the convincing. My objective in this thread has -and continues to be- to convey key peices of evidence that are presented in it. Yes, you can tell theyre the same people-watch it!! Also, after you watch it, you can make an honest assessment using your own observational powers the Mule in question is stuffing into the box- is it an innocent 2 , maybe 3 , or is it 20 or more? Watch and ye shall see!!

Depends on how many members of your household you got; you doin it for 50? Nope- illegal. And 10 or more times? Pretty big immediate family , Id say.

Well, Then, sadly, I guess theres really nothing left to discuss; very easy to dismiss evidence you havent seen. And for the record, I havent dismissed ANY evidence presented in the hearings being conducted currently, just havent watched it is all.

You need to watch it , my friend- seriously.

Tell you what:lets BOTH agree to this; ill watch the hearings, you watch the documentary- deal?

The ones that were included in the movie were not at malls or libraries; they were on street corners as far as I coud tell and the trips had to be contiguous; so, got to an NGO, then the ballot box, more than 10 times, Also, theres video evidence of them stuffing bunches of ballots into the boxes. In all cases, it is illegal to drop more than 1 ballot into sadi boxes, other than your won( The law does allow you to deop for family meber or friend, however). So, your not supposed to be stuffing bunches of ballots into these boxes like the Mules were caught on film doing. Thus, all votes would be comsidered illegal and tainted.

Not even close. Watch the film yourself , please- OBJECTIVELY. If youre honest, youll admit looks pretty damn suspicious.

Yes, but to qualify as a "Mule" you have to meet the following criteria: 1) Have travelled to >10 ballot boxes during the election cycle (september thru november 2020) AND 2) Have travelled to an NGO delineated in the city as Democrat supporting/leaning Note: The ballot collection boxes are ONLY used for ballots- they are not Mail boxes!! So, if someone goes to a ballot collection box once, no problem- twice? Wellll, ok. 3 times?? Whats goi on with this guy? But they STILL didnt count as a Mule until they mmade at least 10 TRIPS. Dont know about you, but sounds pretty suspicious to me

The video evidence is more than impressive in the documentary; I think Mr. Barr is is being a bit dismissive of whats presented.

As I've said to you before, Watch the Documentary before you dismiss the evidence provided in it!!

I understand that, but Did they mention 2000 Mules at all in the hearing(btw, evidence presented in the Doc has nothing to do with dead people voting or fake suitcases of fake balots being counted)?

Did they mention the evidence provided in 2000 Mules?

To me, the most important thing is to actually see the film; upon viewing it, you may, of course, judge accordingly.

A Democrat operative. perhaps?

Their strategy cureently is to simply ignore it, fail to acknowledge or engage in the hope that it will all eventually be forgotten; the scary thing to me is, it appears to be working

He probably still shouldn’t have made that statement at the time , though , considering the more than credible evidence that has come out since . Unfortunately, Barr’s remarks are now used by those that are illinformed on the left in an attempt to discredit what has since been discovered , which it in no way shape or form , does .

Yes , that conclusion was a bit premature as plenty of new evidence has since come to light in the documentary; have you seen it ? Can you debunk the footage ? Looks very compelling to me !!

Love it!! Trout is my fave , though

Best trout fishing is already behind us this year , sadly ; season never seems to last long enough for me

Well, I’d be willing to bet you’re not kidding this time

Wow!!