Northcountryman

Sounds alot like Coomer

Yes, I'm watching and wll adjust my thesis accordingly if it appears to be baseless- and you if it does not?

Yup- agreed. IMHO, , I think the Dems saw an opportunity to exploit '20 because of COVID and push mail-in as the primary MO for voting in that election BECAUSE its so easy to cheat AND not to get caught. Moreover, when you have scumbags like Coomer -in a position of power in a Company like Dominion-who developed and designed much of the systems and their software and who held patents for voting systems with SEVERAL different companies , and with a CLEAR and profound left wing anti Trump bias, then I find it toally believeable that fraud may have been perpetrated. Depsite this guys repeated denials now , I , frankly do not believe him!! Google this guy and youll see whast kind of man he is- trutst me, he doesnt come off as overly trustworthy!!!

Why do you say its not real? Im not saying for a fact that it is, but I think it is; do you know otherwise?

Well, I could be wrong here....

Anyone hear of Eric Coomer? I've been readin about this guy as it pertains to the '20 election fraud claim and ill tell ya, there really MAY be something there!! Let me clarify something: i'm not saying that the election was stolen unequivocally as I'm not willing to go that far; however, I do believe that there was significant election malfeasance going on that MAY have significantly impacted the outcome. Morover, alot of fingers are bring pointed at this guy, ERic Coomer : Eric Coomer is the former Director of Security and Product Strategy for Dominion Voting Systems. After the 2020 election debacle, where votes in at least five states had very suspicious results while running Dominion computer systems, center-right journalists made common-sense observations that the results appeared rigged. One journalist, who had infiltrated a conference call filled with Antifa-sympathizing callers, remembered that on the call “Eric from Dominion” was going to ensure that Trump did not win re-election. Now, if you check out some of his now-deleted facebook rants, this dude was a clearly unhinged hard core leftie Trump hater. Now, of course he is entitled to his opinion, as we all are, but would you really want someone with such clear bias against the former Prez to be in charge of voting in multiple states? I wouldnt!!!

You'd be surprised how much people on both sides of the political spectrum actually agree; where they differ is , how to go about getting there.

Why do you find that ironic , then?

Im assuming that you find irony in the situation based on the assumption they werent together

Im hoping to go wet a line tomorrow-weather permitting, of course .

What would your proposal be hypothetically, of course to fix that supposed problem Mike? Would you advocate putting a cap on the amount that earners can make in a given year? If so, very bad idea in my book!

Not a cry wagon if it, in fact , really happened. Everything elese you said I agree with.

Yes they are and the fraud is undetectable, so those that say that the election must have been fair and square cuz no significant evidence of fraud was uncoverered are being way too dismissive in my view .

More and more, I'm actually starting to believe that the '20 election WAS rigged , and significantly enough to determine the outcome!! Heres how its done, as desctibed by a scumbag Democrat (hes actually a Bernie Sanders supporter) who claims ro have pulled it off countless times in the Garden state- check it!! https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/

Just found this, too

I dont know, but looks like the chickens are coming home to roost in the Democrat party!! Check this out:

Its not just kids affected by this , though, its all of us-evidenced by the Judges response to a an incredibly straight forward query such as "What is a Woman". Thats what concerns me the most, as it inexorably leads to the reality distoration that were seeing now.

Agreed- as is often the case, the "empathy and tolerance" is taken too far ,resulting in obfuscation of reality.

Excellent summation of the facts and I agree , but how far should our tolerance and empathy extend ? To the point where we can no longer define the difference between woman and man ? Not in my view .

I like that!!

I always have VH, but I stand by what I say: A Woman is a person who is born with a vagina and a womb, period.

I still cant get over the whole "whats a woman " thing. When that questions was aked and she replied that she couldnt define what a woman is, it struck how profoundly disparate liberals and conservatives point of view regarding the issue of sex and gender. I consider myself to be a very tolerant person, try not to be judgy and feel that I have a great deal of empathy/sympathy for others and their plights I recognize and fully acknowledge that Gender Dysphoria is real and that those afflicted with it are confused and tormented souls who feel trapped in a physical body that doesnt match their gender identity. Having said that, I will NOT overcorrect by indulging in a fantasy akin to the old "Emperor Has No clothes" Fable and pretend that an individual whos birth sex is opposite their stated gender preference is equivalent to others whos birth sex matches their gender. In other words, if youre a transgender woman , youre not REALLY a woman !! You can dress like one, walk and talk like one, act like one, etc. but you are NOT equivalent and equal biologically and anatomically to a person assigned that sex at birth!!! You dont have a vagina and ovaries nor did you ever have them!! To me , thats what TRULY makes a woman a woman!! Out of respect to transgender individuals and for the sake of civility and proper soaical decorum, I will use their preferred pronouns , I will not disrespect and/or discriminate against them, etc, but I will NOT pretend theyre something that they really arent!! And Rest assured, those one the left such as Ketanji-Brown Jackson feel secretly feel the same way, but they wont say it , lest they offend transgenders and come off as being a intolerant "bigots" and that would be a travesty!! After all, its more impt that these sycophants overindulge a very small segment of the population and pretend the Emperor Has No clothes than to acknowledge reality!!

No Sir , youre wrong.

Really shouldnt look at it that way IMHO. I want the person to be : 1. competent, and 2.Not an activist and especially not 3. A liberal Activist !! lol

Yeah, I started pretty much neutral about her, but as the heatrings progressed, Im really not liking what Im hearing . No doubt, she is an activist judge with a very far-left point of view thats quite disturbing.