Northcountryman

I don’t think there’s that many of either , but if I had to hazard a guess as to which is currently a greater threat to public safety , I would say black racism hand s down- wouldn’t you ?

Completely untrue and inaccurate

That is true , but I do believe Giuliani will have it soon enough !!

I’ve said this before : just because they currently can’t prove it In court doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. There is some video evidence coming out and was just released in February detailing mass voter fraud in several swing states ; they’re actually making a documentary about it that’s coming out this month , I believe. Read the links posted previously in the thread and you will see .

In understand what you’re saying considering his victims were diverse , but insanity driven on by racial animus perhaps , then? He clearly was racist , no doubt about it - insane , also? Sure , I’d buy it .

What concerns me most regarding this issue is the left perpetuating this white supremacy lie continually is exacerbating racial turmoil and anti white sentiment . I would challenge Mayorkas , Biden or any inside the Biden administration that continues to echo this myth to provide some evidence to back up their claim - they can’t , cuz it’s bullish&#%!!! Same as the voter suppression myth . How can they continue to get away with such a big lie? Their media cohorts !!!

In response , I would say that you need to Read his online rants ; trust me , they are not the musings of a sane , even tempered man with love for all in his heart .

So I saw on the news that they caught the bag of sh*%# that shot up the subway in Brooklyn yesterday and …SURPRISE !! It appears -from YEARS of violent anti white racist posts- that his motivations were based on anti white / racist beliefs and sentiments (ie , a black racist ) . Questions I have are : why was he allowed to post such hateful vitriolic rhetoric on social media ? At the very least , Shouldn’t his accounts have been suspended like they do with conservatives? Moreover , didn’t DHS Secretary JUST CLAIM in a speech last week about the illegal border crossings that were he number #1 issue and threat this country currently faces is from white supremacy ? Really?? Doesn’t appear so , does it ? These people are lying … all of them !! Even more scary , they know it themselves , and it’s all being done to further a narrative , perpetuate a myth - that being the myth of white racism . It is absolute hogwash !!! In contrast , I would argue that currently , the # 1 domestic threat we face is that from black racists and other far left extremists . All I can say is: this racist rhetoric perpetuated by leftie networks such as CNN MSDNC has to stop !! Otherwise , People are going to die !!

Here we go again with the lawsuits ….

Well, considering the fact that Im a believer in election fraud, Im not going to discount your position, but kind of agree with DD here. Since New York is a traditional Democrat bastion, why would they need to cheat here to win?

Just saw this on the News last night. Obviously, its not just Republicans who are noticing Biden's dotage: https://nypost.com/2022/04/12/saudi-tv-show-mocks-joe-biden-and-kamala-harris/ Very embarrassing to our country

Nah - he took care of that all on his own ….

Agreed - Obama was awful too . Only difference between he and Biden is he was able to conceal his incompetence better due to his charisma .

I can live with that .

You absolutely could not say that to any of us in person with a straight face IMHO - competent ? Clearly , Biden is the antithesis of that, and Harris is even worse . Hopefully , we can persist until Trump can win again in ‘24 - God help us ….

Not true my friend ; it’s very clear , however , that you’ve made up your mind regarding the matter and are not objective at all as you would refuse to acknowledge it no matter what come out post election. Why do you consider it nonsense ? Did you read the articles? I’ll bet you didn’t even read them did you ?

And another : https://crimeofthecentury2020.com/exclusive-democrats-implicated-georgia-ballot-traffickers-were-using-democrat-officials-offices-as-stopping-points-during-ballot-drop-runs

Here is another article I found concerning a practice called "Voter Trafficking"- ever heard of it (I have not until now)? Apparently, its a form of coordinated voter fraud involving paid operatives - all for the Democrats, of course- that were stuffing ballot boxes in the few weeks leading up to the '20 election. All of it appears to take place in the swing states where the election was pretty much decided (i.e., PA, AZ, WI , etc.). If true and accurate , it may be the "smoking gun" evidence required to prove that the massive election fraud claims are true-check it!! https://www.survivethenews.com/true-the-vote-finds-107-ballot-trafficking-suspects-in-wisconsin-visited-the-ballot-drop-boxes-over-2000-times-in-the-two-weeks-before-the-2020-election-audio/

Did a little more digging and reading this am about voter fraud and how easy it is to perpetrate it via mail-in. Check out this article written by a woman in florida who did it, like 10 yrs ago, as an experiment just to see if she could get away with it- answer was YUP!! Imagine what they can get away with now!! And the thing is, ina closely contested election in a battleground state , this CAN affect the outcome AND it wont be detected in an election audit !! (directed at my man Virgil who is, seemingly so derisive about the suggestion that election fraud affected the '20 election- likening its espousal to be the equivalent of "belief in the involvement of martians" lol). On the contrary, I do believe its very real: check it!! .https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/fl-op-com-menge-mail-in-ballots-fraud-florida-20200416-hanmbneuendpbaftyktpactlga-story.html

I'm afraid its just a wee bit more beleieveable than Martians.

Apparently, youre a late-comer to this thread, then cuz Ive posted some evidence/issues that -to many- are serious red flags. The "audits" that you repeatedly cite as definitive proof of no voter fraud WOULD NOT CATCH the mass paper mail in ballot fraud used enmasse in '20; nor would they catch a computer program designed to switch votes if it were internalized. Now, I'm not saying that happened , but it COULD have happened . You need to google some of the ways voting machines can- and are- hacked to obtain different results. Youd be surprised at how easy it is to do for someone who knows what theyre doing. And would a guy like Coomer be capable of such an enterprise? YUP. That doesnt mean he did, of course, but considering his CLEAR bias and intensely strong dislike for the former PREZ, would I put it past him, or others of a similar bent? NOPE.

Again, youre wrong- do you read yours? This is the query from you that I responded to: I said no , did I not? Youre trying to overgeneralize here my friend, arguing that because I believe the election was fraudulent , that I am unwavering in that position and could never be convinced otherwise- NOT!! Thats why I responded to your post, because I absolutely could be convinced otherwise IF the evidence is there!! To date, it is not and I would argue that the reverse -as it stand right now- is actually true. Read your own post Virgil!! I dont think that you do!! Im saying no to your query , not yes- youre wrong!! No, I would NOT continue to doubt the results!!!!

Wrong- you asked me if I would contnue to doubt the results and I said no. How is that a contradiction? I'm glad to see your response and it appears then, that we both agree.

Already answered- no. And if the situation were reversed and significant fraud was, ultimately uncovered and apparent, would you admit that the election was illegitmate ?

Nevr been a fair and honest election ?? I dont know about that; guess it depends how you define "fair and honest". If it requires absolutely no cheating at all (i.e. votinf twice, throwing away votes, dead people voting, etc. ) to qualify as a fair and honest election, then I agree. Realistically, though, I'd move for a more realistic def. with a lower bar or standard. To me, if the amount of fraud is significant enough to impact the outsome, then the election is certainly fraudulent; if not, though, then I would say it was at least "Fair" , if not honest- problem is, how does one know if the amount of fraud was significant enough to impact the outcome?