Northcountryman

Yes , really

And a very effective President !!

Completely inaccurate - actually , the opposite is true . As a matter of fact , I would say his replacement fits this description much more accurately.

Trumps the man !!!

It’s currently well on its wayb

No , I’m afraid you’re not - not never

Oh , I see - but it’s ok to insult fellow forum members whom you disagree with? I’m sorry , but you are completely full of it Chef lol. Don’t you realize that many on here find some of your opinions just as idiotic as you do theres? Doesn’t sound too tolerant to me !!

Chef , that’s not true - you do it all the time . Should I reference a few of the myriad insults and demeaning quotes you’ve graced us with over the past number of months, especially in the vaccination thread ? It would be quite easily , actually lol.

I agree

Justice has been served, for sure.

Yup, and congruent with the same logic appplied by the vaxx mandate supporters who subscribe to the notion that receiving said vaxx is equivalent to societal recognition as a truly virtuous person, these individuals should be ostracized and shamed for their reckless and selfish behavior lol.

Yes, she is terrible: unprepared, uninformed and overall, abjectly ignorant. I may differ from alot of you my Republican brethren on here in that I actually pray that nothing happens to Biden till the end of his term cuz then were stuck with her. If You guys thiunk hes bad, imagine what would happen to our country under a President Harris!!!

I got a Wolf too ; so I take it you like yours ? Have you been successful with it ? Haven’t taken a deer yet with mine but hoping to this year .

Yup , happened to me last year - frustrating .

Yes, I couldnt agree more- and next time you post in the Vaxx thread and resort to insults and name calling like you often do, I will copy and paste the quote from your own post here!!

Yes, but you are being far too generous towards the Left , my friend. Reason i say this is, they didnt just report "They are investigating the Trump administration for Russian collusion";rather, they went so far as to support the narrative for YEARS -all of them (CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC) and REFUSED to recant even though the investigation concluisons showed otherwise!! they kept perpetuating. I think that is far more than just a difference of opnion- no, it is distorting facts to fit a false narrative. This is objective and is not opinion based. As I've said before, I'm not saying that FOX and conservatives are never guilty of this because I'm sure you could find examples if you looked hard enough. But one need not look hard at all to find the false narratives, distortions of truth and outright boldface lies told by the media that has blatantly been in the tank for the Democrat party for at least the past 20 years (and far longer if you count the time they kept it hidden better: remember Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather?). Its a shame, really. Good for you, because that is , indeed the truth!! Like you, I consider my positions to be malleable and am always open to altering them based on new facts and information, even if that means an outright rejection of my original stances on certain issues. I couldnt agree more and always look forward to robust debate with you and other members that are respectful of others points of view and opinions, even if they disagree with them. Unfortunately, there are several on here that do not-based on the tone and tenor of their posts, it is quite obvious who these individuals are of which i speak lol.

I stand by what I said : FOX is WAY more accurate in terms of representing the truth. Would you like to do a comparison analysis? Ill take that bet !!

You do make a great point here , my friend and I agree- at least, to a certain extent. But there is definitely a significant amount of objectivity involved in these issues here, as well, to be sure. As an example, we both could adopt opposing points of view about Trumps and Obamas Presidencies and offer evidence to back up our positions; the difference, , however, would lie in the validity of said "evidence". Clearly, some "truth" is subjective and some not- example being the Russian Collusion Hoax perpetuated by both networks which was clearly not true. I'm sure you could also find some inaccuracies in FOX narratives/positions as well but I'd bet dollars to donuts youd find FAR more with the other teo than you would them- that, however, is just my opninion and not a fact (I'm clarifying that so as not be like Chef lol).

It would be interesting to do a comparison of all major news events within the past few years between FOX and CNN/MSDNC narratives and, in retrospect, see who was more accurate, if not completely correct about what they were saying/reporting at the time. I would bet money that FOX would win- hands down.

Perhaps, but I would wager that FOX is WAY more accurate in the long term. Hey, maybe ill start a thread on that lol!!

And Who said anything about Trump/ COVID not being real? I agree that the vaxx works- at least to a certain extent- but its overall efficacy and issues related to chronic/side effects are still very real.

Surely, you jest. They have ZERO credibility Chef; even moderates know it. The fact that you dont-well....

In terms of cable news sources, that describes Communist News (CNN) , MSDNC and the triad of democrat party support networks (CBS, ABC and NBC) perfectly lol.

I need to do this ; does it really make that much difference ? I think I’m gonna start by doin a search on conclusions drawn from vaccine vs natural immunity studies using both and see if there’s a difference !!

Good info provided!! If you dont mind, I have some ??: 1) What is meant by a "higher virus clearting rate " mentioned for those breakthroughs 2)Arent there potential reservoirs everywhere potentially? I measn, just because a population has a high vx rate doe not mean that they cannot-and will not- get the virus and/or transmit it to others. In many cases, /i would suspect this is due to aympotmatic indiviuals tranmitting it. Morover, if youre asymptomatic yet "have" the virus, isnt it then replicasting in your system? And if so, can it not therefore still mutate via known errors in transcription/translation? 3)Your 3 rd point is probably right although , again, to what degree is that true?