A stab in the back from Remington -- Money Talks

[WNYBuckHunter]

I have, and I don't see anything that bans inheritance of legally possessed guns. Maybe I missed it- that's why I'm asking where you saw it. Or, did you maybe get it from the same source that gave you that bit about the upstate shooter having just gotten out of a mental institution. I haven't seen that mentioned anywhere else.

Well seeing as i never said he JUST got out of a mental institution, i said recently. Im not sure on the exact date at this point.

As far as the safe act goes, no firearm that has been deemed as an assault weapon can be transferred to anyone within NY state except for a dealer or to the police. Pretty cut and dry.

[Culvercreek hunt club]

http://www.waynecosheriff.org/nysecure%20ammo2013cuomo.pdf

 

outlined in bullets from the Sheriff

[WNYBuckHunter]

Thanks Culver, i didnt have time to dig out a link.

[virgil]

Interesting.  Like I said, I could have missed it.  I guess you'll just have to sell them before you die and leave your kids a college fund instead.

[virgil]

Culver, that document looks like a summary that didn't come directly from the governor's office.  Do you know for sure if the actual law wasn't just paraphrased or misinterpreted?  I don't see it in the actual bill itself.  But, like I said, it would be easy to miss.

[Culvercreek hunt club]

It was a Sheriff dept summary on it. I will link the law. I can't remember the paragrah out of 39 pages but will look

Edited March 14, 2013 by Culvercreek hunt club

[Culvercreek hunt club]

start reading on page 17 line 36 with special emphasis on page 20 lines 3-18. There is no family exemption as there is under the other section. Transfer can take place between immediate family members without a NICS background check but that does not include any weapon classified as an assault weapon.

 

http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/555483/120412062-gun-bill-pdf.pdf

 

 

Page 8 line 26 cover the exemption for immediate family members for firearms (pistols) rifles and shotguns. not the new category of assault weapons.

 

so get the assault weapons out of state or on your death  turn them in. They are registered and they know who has them. teun them in or the person that has them is in for a stiff sentence.

 

Edited March 14, 2013 by Culvercreek hunt club

[WNYBuckHunter]

Yep. Like I said, its confiscation.

[virgil]

Thanks Culver.  Yeah, I can see why you'd have an issue with that.  At the very least, I would think that your family should be paid fair market value for them if they are required to turn them in.

[shawnhu]

Thanks Culver. Yeah, I can see why you'd have an issue with that. At the very least, I would think that your family should be paid fair market value for them if they are required to turn them in.

So you were wrong, man up to it. And if you haven't noticed already, it's not about the $, it's about our rights. Don't try to turn this into something that can be bought.

[virgil]

Shawnhu, if you actually read my earlier posts, you'll see that I never said that it wasn't there- only that I didn't see and was asking where to find it.

[Culvercreek hunt club]

Thanks Culver.  Yeah, I can see why you'd have an issue with that.  At the very least, I would think that your family should be paid fair market value for them if they are required to turn them in.

Your welcome.

 

[Mr VJP]

Virgil also just stated he is OK with the government telling you you cannot legally own a gun you legally bought and owned for years!  He's OK with them telling you that you cannot give it to your son and you must turn it in.  I'll bet he's also OK with the government telling you to pay hundreds of dollars a year to keep it too.  That should tell you a lot about the mindset of some gun owners.

 

As long as the law doesn't personally affect them, the hell with you!

 

That sounds to me like giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

[shawnhu]

Shawnhu, if you actually read my earlier posts, you'll see that I never said that it wasn't there- only that I didn't see and was asking where to find it.

Doesn't matter what you want to quote in your earlier post. Fact is that you stated the government would never confiscate any guns, and this law clearly states otherwise. You still need to own up to your ignorance and stupidity of how you underestimate your government and your insults to many on this very respectable forum.

I'll be waiting for your apology that will never come.

[virgil]

I think I stated that I can see why you'd be unhappy with the part of the law that prevents you from passing your property down to your family after you die.  But, I don't think that's exactly the same as 'confiscation'.  Anyway, you two wingnuts can continue your paranoia party for all I care.

[Mr VJP]

Yeah right.  And banning and confiscating are not really the same either.

 

I don't believe in splitting hairs where freedom is concerned.  If it infringes on my property or 2nd Amendment rights, I don't care what type of Orwellian double speak you choose to use to justify it.