Geno C Posted September 23, 2011 Author Share Posted September 23, 2011 I understand what you guys are saying.Im just not claiming to know what happened after the video stopped, which is what I already said. Why should I argue the other side of it? You guys already took care of that. this is true... both sides are arguable... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adirondackbushwhack Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 I don't think both sides are arguable. If the shooter was anything at all he would have taken a follow up shot before loosing the dog or in the event that the dog was already loose he would have taken a follow up shot BEFORE the dog got to the pig. To my mind it doesn't matter what happened after the video stopped because it already showed a dishonorable act. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.