Doc

So, are we saying that PA. Department of Natural Resources does not understand coyote management and frankly are incapable of reading scientific papers, studies and research. After all, this is a DNR backed idea. I really don't know. I don't have any dealings with them, so I am just asking. If bounties don't work, one would think that they would not be proposing such a thing. If killing coyotes does in fact make more of them pop up, why do you think the PA. DNR has never come across that info. Or is it possible that they have actually found contrary studies that debunked that notion. Again, I am just asking if these guys are simply inept, or might they have better sources of coyote management data and research than we do.

Yeah, the article caught my eye because we have had so many discussions about coyote vs. deer and small game and whatever. And now into the act pops the PA. DNR. I don't have a whole lot of knowledge about the workings and capabilities of these people to our south, so I don't really have any axe to grind one way or the other. But I assume that just like our own DEC, they probably think quite highly of themselves and probably have a lot of paper and credentials that back up the credibility of their actions. And this bounty thing seems to be their idea. So naturally I had to ask the question. Who really has it right. I know that NYS outlawed all bounties unless health concerns can be demonstrated, so we needn't be expecting this thinking to migrate north. But I really am curious as to what us laymen think about all the stuff flying around about coyote control.

Actually I think I said what I said very clearly and it doesn't need any editorializing or spin from the likes of you. It would appear that it isn't only your guns that are full of air.....lol.

This is what happens when you cram things down people's throats using the same tactics that brought us the Safe Act. The early clandestine hurry to jam something in before any opposition can be mounted struck again. Of course there was rebellion. What did they expect? Treating bowhunters like errant children being punished for not harvesting enough does to balance the deer populations wasn't exactly the right thing to do either. These people are beginning to disgust me, and apparently others as well. What wasn't complained about quite as loudly was how the muzzleloaders were also being screwed. It sounds like they went farther than the bowhunters with some of them not even buying a license.

Plus, it's just fun shooting. For me bowhunting is only part of it. I really do like shooting the bow.

I don't really know how to do that. My super moderator powers are limited .... lol.

Sorry Grow ...... I think this is in response to my "coyote bounty" reply that I deleted and moved out into its own topic. I didn't really want to keep moving this thread any farther off topic. I guess I wasn't fast enough ......lol.

Not all that unusual. There's are lot of people that like to keep the archery muscles tuned up year around. When I was a member of Avon Bowmen, we used to have an indoor range over in Caledonia for winter league competition. I finally had to get out because it was a 70 mile round trip on winter roads (ha-ha .... that was dedication). So I took their target face, made it a 3/4 scaled down version and started shooting in my basement at 15 yards instead of the official 20 yards. I still do that just to keep my hand in the target stuff a bit.

Did anyone notice in the last issue of NYON (New York Outdoor News) the article on Pennsylvania working on a $25 bounty for coyotes. Money well spent, or a waste of money for them? What do you think?

On the DEC page that discusses CTFs, they had the following description of "stakeholders": Stakeholders are people affected by deer who have a particular concern or interest in the overall population of deer in a WMU. Farmers, hunters, foresters, conservationists, motorists, the tourism industry, landowners, small business, etc., are all considered as potentially distinct stakeholder groups. Apparently when they list Motorists, they must be referring to AAA .... lol. By the way, the people on these CTFs are the ones that canvass whatever financial interests that they represent and input their combined recommendations about desired deer densities and harvest goals. So if the Motorists stakeholder category listed is referring to or including insurance companies, then indeed, the insurance companies are not only "approaching" the DEC, but they have an official part in dictating the deer densities around the state.

Well, it's time to move a couple of items and uncover the bow target in the basement. It's only 15 yards, but all I do is use a smaller bulls eye .... lol. Sure is better than standing out in the snow with a temperature in the teens. Anybody else doing some winter shooting (in home or a commercial range)?

Call the DEC. There are at least two violations going on there, and they may have some interest.

Look, now-a-days, it is fashionable to cram anything you want into bow season. The term bowseason can be stretched and pulled and tortured to include anything anybody wants. I have no doubt that when the DEC gets ready to cram yet another thing into bow season, they will include this abortion in the blink of an eye.

I saw a guy out town using a snow-blower to do his sidewalk out front. Boy! did that work slick. Took it right down to the concrete as fast as he could walk.

Last year, I got real close to not having anyplace to put the snow. With 1000' between me and the road, that wasn't a real pleasant prospect. I did it when I was a whole lot younger. Cars were parked out at the road and everything was dragged in and out with a hand-pulled toboggan.... that included 100# bags of chicken feed.......Not fun! So I have no love for even seeing any snow .... lol. So far I am just loving this winter. We are in a slot that has missed every storm and lake effect finger. Let's keep it that way. I do feel sorry for the snowmobilers, but those guys in NYS are not really too far from all the snow they want.

Pretty good gadget for the anti-hunting wackos too. Imagine trying to listen for a deer to be coming with that nasty whining POS circling overhead. There are so many ways to misuse these things (hunting or otherwise), that I am not looking forward to the proliferation of these things now or in the future. I think the state should immediately make written landowner permission required before they can be flown over private property.

I guess it could be worse....

I hope that in those 3-1/2 years you at least went on a moose hunt or two. They have tremendous moose hunting. What part of Ontario were you in? And the crazy fishing they have up there can keep you busy for an entire summer. Some places up there the pike are almost impossible to keep off the hook. I hope you got into plenty of that.

How do you prove that a drone was being used for scouting? You are stuck with mind-reading intent. There is no law that says that you can't fly over lands inhabited by deer. I suspect it is only a matter of time before somebody mounts a small gun on one of these things, and then the mis-use and mayhem begins. Perhaps it may become the weapon of choice for domestic terrorism. Perhaps hunting abuses will become the least of our worries relative to drones.

Ha-ha-ha ..... What a great come-back! One name says it all ..... lol.

My faith in youth has been restored. This kid has got it right. Perhaps the biggest problem to hunter recruitment is not the kids, but rather the parents attitudes toward outdoor activities. When I was a kid, I was raised around , fishing, hunting, camping, family outings, vacations built around outdoor activities. Both my parents were involved in outdoor interests. I don't see that so much anymore. There is a culture shift going on, and I don't see it retreating .... ever. But this kid put it all into words so much better than I ever could.

Actually, as I understood it, the topic was about deer reactions to dogs, and how that might impact deer hunting and established and scouted out deer patterns. I think that in that context, how deer react to the presence of dogs (any dogs) is exactly on-topic. I also believe that the deer's local experiences with chasing dogs and/or chasing coyotes may also impact the deer's escape reactions when dogs are encountered (Even nice deer-friendly coon hounds) that might alter significantly the results of that study. It is an important aspect that they didn't consider. And again, a discussion of the role of coyotes could very well be exactly on topic as well, because that wrinkle to the deer's world was not studied in terms of how goosey deer can get regarding the intrusion of dogs. Whatever else that moved into the discussion may simply be the normal topic drift that occurs when a topic has been around too long. Threads do have a natural movement to them that is absolutely understandable to a certain extent.

I was rooting for the gator.

It's been put into the DVR.

What is on top is no indicator of what is underneath. Perhaps some backhoe work with test holes might have shown a little of what is under the floor of your pond.