Grouse

When the power of education is ceded to government: 1) Parents lose control of their kids educational decisions and are subject to criminal prosecution for non-compliance. 2) Political interference replaces parental rights. 3) Many students are forced to be drugged if they fail to follow orders or act appropriately in the eyes of the school. 4) Teacher’s unions support one political party, and that political party forces its interests into the curriculum, no matter how ridiculous they may be, replacing the entire purpose of childhood education and leaving students functionally illiterate but well versed in the political manipulations of the day. 5) Teacher’s unions also advocated for extended lock downs, causing interminable increases in mental illness in the students. Young people need to be busy or bad things tend to happen. 6) Teacher’s unions also advocate for the elimination of educational competition, against school choice, and against educational funding following the student. Political programming becomes the most important goal of Teacher’s unions. It’s important to remember that government-controlled education is relatively new, and was historically used by dictatorial regimes to create people who were subservient and completely indoctrinated as to the will of the violent regimes. It’s okay to try to figure out a better way. Future generations would benefit greatly.

The leftist ruling class pushes abortion because they want to control births. This will eventually metastasize into the Chinese policy of controlled family size, where you will be told how many children you can have and you will be forced to abort the rest. Planned Parenthood started out as a racist organization to control what it's founder, Margaret Sanger, called "human weeds". The desire for abortions by the ruling class has not changed. It's all about control.

Never forget... The Constitution was not written to tell the citizen what they CAN do; It was written to tell the government what it CAN'T do. US law and the Constitution were based on English Common Law principles...which is to say: anything not specifically prohibited to the citizen, is allowed. This is the fallacy with leftist arguments on restriction of rights. Since the government is legally banned from restricting and regulating said rights...and the citizen is completely free to exercise them, there is nothing government can legally do to infringe upon them (aside from a constitutional amendment). That is of course...unless you allow them to... This is why...the only appropriate response to unconstitutional laws must be mass noncompliance. If you choose to comply...you have chosen subjugation.