josephmrtn

or go to a QDMA seminar and have kip adams teach ya... lol

+1

Dang i can only push the like button once!!!!

some places have over population i can see this being a good way to get rid of em... also some hunters might hunt several states or shoot multiple deer and dont need all the meat so they donate it.... person in charge of that place should be fired

sorry bud... wiki definition: A crossbow is a weapon consisting of a bow mounted on a stock that shoots projectiles, often called bolts or quarrels.

I saw the title and wondered which moron posted it.............. then i opened it and it was a joke... a good one at that

WTH

It's raining here right now so of course, Luke bryan rain Is a good thing is the song of the day... LOL

Welcome aboard!!!

Were all gonna be felons soon....

+1

it was all done in a lab though... the chance that that could happen in real life is like one in 5 trillion.... plus i dont think it could anyhow... but that is the conclusion i have come too YOUR RIGHT!!!! im not a scientist!!!! LOL im just stating what i believe...

How do you know? do you have a Ph.D. on the subject?

all them PETA and HSUS people need to go get on a rocket and move to mars... and leave us hunters alone... they've been a thorn in our side WAY too long

Hey guys i need one of these: http://leeprecision.com/ez-x-exp-30-cal-long.html/ however for some strange reason there website wont let me order it... any ideas? or does anyone have one they wanna get rid of?

dont sound very strong..... just sayin

Got back this afternoon... was BEAUTIFUL weather!!!! upper 60's!!! jeans and t shirt weather... had a lot of fun and got to meet some relatives i havnt met in YEARS... great uncle john (former sherriffs deputy) great uncle jerry (not sure what he does for work) and different others... might try and post a few pics.......

Article By Dr John Morris Ph.D. Hasn't Life Been Created in the Laboratory? It's in all the textbooks. Every high school biology student is exposed to it. It's taught as if it were fact and "that all scientists agree." It's thought to be "proof" of evolution and yet—is it really true? According to strict naturalistic evolution, life sprung from non-living chemicals on at least one occasion in Earth's past. It doesn't happen today because the atmospheric conditions are all wrong for life to form, but conditions must have been different in the past in just the right way for complex organic (i.e., carbon-based) molecules to come together. Today's atmosphere contains abundant free oxygen (02), and this oxygen is absolutely essential for life's functions. Our lungs deliver oxygen to the blood where it traverses the body, reaching all of our 75 trillion cells. Furthermore, as O3, it comprises the ozone layer which protects all of life from destructive cosmic radiation. But while oxygen is essential for life's continuance, oxygen destroys non-living organic molecules (the building blocks of life) at a much faster rate than they could possibly form. Thus, it is assumed in origin-of-life scenarios, that Earth's early atmosphere was a "reducing" atmosphere with no free oxygen ("oxidizing"). In 1953, University of Chicago graduate student, Stanley Miller, working with Nobel Prize Laureate Harold Urey, simulated what they proposed was the make-up of the early atmosphere in a brilliantly conceived laboratory experiment. This "reducing" atmosphere contained hydrogen (H), methane (H+C), ammonia (H+N), and water vapor (H+O), but no free oxygen. By sending an electric spark (simulating lightning) through the mixture they succeeded in producing some simple amino acids, the building blocks of life and other organic compounds, and claimed a great triumph for evolution. This concept continues to be propagated today in "every" textbook and is used in support of the evolutionary, naturalistic way of thinking. But now with more knowledge it has become abundantly clear that Earth's atmosphere has always had free oxygen. Water vapor readily breaks down into hydrogen and oxygen. Furthermore, we find oxidized minerals in rocks of every supposed age. Cells, whose ancestors are thought to have pre-dated the evolution of photosynthesis, likewise contain evidence that they lived in the presence of oxygen. There are other problems with the experiment as well. The amino acid mixture produced contained only a few of the many necessary for even "simple" life, but many not used by any life. All amino acids were of both left and right-handed varieties, while life uses only left handed. Since the spark which formed the amino acids would much more readily have destroyed them, they had to be purposely removed from the system in a trap, thus concentrated in a manner most unnatural. Furthermore, such molecules could not have been stable without an ozone shield surrounding Earth. Let's review. The experiment had the wrong starting conditions. It employed the wrong methods. It yielded the wrong products. Other than that, it was a wonderful experiment!

No they havn't... "We're basically getting new life out of the computer," Venter says. "We started with a genetic code in the computer, wrote the 'software,' put it into the cell and transformed it biologically into a new species there already was life they just modified it... believe me they have tried for YEARS to create life out of plain chemicals but it is impossible to do so...

check w dairy farmers for dead calves.....

Along the road grandma and grandpa live along (where great grandma lived) grandmas brothers (greatgrandmas sons) made a sign for great grandma that said grandma crossing...

LOL looks cool

Evolution has been sientificly proven to be impossible. i think it was Louie Pastuer that proved life can ONLY come from life... matter can NOT create life... which obviously disproves evolution i think its sad that we have begun to forsake the truths that our forfathers the founders of this nation "held to be self evident"

I firmly believe in it.... Hey guys i got a question... IF we all evolved from monkeys (i dont believe we did) then why is it wrong for me or someone else to got into a school and shoot up a bunch of "smart monkeys" and why does it seem wrong? after all monkeys attack kill and eat each other if we are smart monkeys we should do the same... in my opinion. if there is no God there is no point in life...

LOL like that one!!!