nyantler Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 Doesn't get much clearer than that... good post 2B! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2BRKnot2B Posted March 1, 2011 Share Posted March 1, 2011 Why does no one ever ask that an insane person, an idiot, moron, retard, or just plain anti-American have to be registered with the state to speak? Why can't they be precluded based on their mental non-acuity? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virgil Posted March 1, 2011 Share Posted March 1, 2011 Why does no one ever ask that an insane person, an idiot, moron, retard, or just plain anti-American have to be registered with the state to speak? Why can't they be precluded based on their mental non-acuity? Careful what you wish for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2BRKnot2B Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Why does no one ever ask that an insane person, an idiot, moron, retard, or just plain anti-American have to be registered with the state to speak? Why can't they be precluded based on their mental non-acuity? Careful what you wish for. That didn't answer the question, smart ass. Would you have as much trouble with this idea? Most leftists don;t have a problem with registering guns, but they wold have a problem with registering people to speak. Yet, oth are individual rights, both guaranteed by the constitution. But one is treated differently than the other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowflinger Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Why does no one ever ask that an insane person, an idiot, moron, retard, or just plain anti-American have to be registered with the state to speak? Why can't they be precluded based on their mental non-acuity? Careful what you wish for. That didn't answer the question, smart ass. Would you have as much trouble with this idea? Most leftists don;t have a problem with registering guns, but they wold have a problem with registering people to speak. Yet, oth are individual rights, both guaranteed by the constitution. But one is treated differently than the other? No crazy person has killed 20 people by speaking, no matter how stupid their view is. Although you are getting dangerously close. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2BRKnot2B Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 So, you're saying Hitler's speeches never encouraged the German people to murder tens of millions, Arrowflinger? Now that's just ridiculous of you to make such an absurd statement. Just proves a level of mentality that lacks critical path thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Every statement you make Arrow just proves how little you know about the real world... newsflash! The fantasy world you live in doesn't exist. Oh yeah the Rev. Jim Jones would be another that killed masses with speach... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virgil Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 You guys are so adament about not giving an inch regarding gun laws and 'your rights'. With that line of thought, how do you feel about the laws against someone yelling 'Fire' in a crowded theatre? Isn't that a restriction on freedom of speech? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowflinger Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Anyone who would advocate giving weapons to felons and known mentally unstable people is beyond the reach of rational thought. You guys are whack jobs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 nobody said that... read what was written and you might get the point Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 You guys are so adament about not giving an inch regarding gun laws and 'your rights'. With that line of thought, how do you feel about the laws against someone yelling 'Fire' in a crowded theatre? Isn't that a restriction on freedom of speech? Freedom of speech does not extend to those who harm people with said speech. The right to own guns does not extend to those who harm others with said guns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 You are assuming that Arrow is mature enough to understand that WNYB... his past statements would suggest otherwise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowflinger Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 LOL Feeling threatened? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 LOL Feeling threatened? Case in point... : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virgil Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Freedom of speech does not extend to those who harm people with said speech. The right to own guns does not extend to those who harm others with said guns. Fair enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.