Buckmaster7600 Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 I haven't shot 280. How does it compare to .308 or 270?270, 280 and 30-06 recoil is very similar until you get into the heavier 06'sSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stubborn1VT Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 On 1/2/2017 at 11:49 AM, Tikka T3 said: I went with a Tikka T3 in 7-08 six years ago and never looked back. Had the barrel cut to 18inches and mounted a Lupe 2x7 on it. I like the Tikka because of the detach magazine. I load and shoot 140 gr BT and hunt the Adirondacks were I live. I leave the Remingtons in the safe now but still take the Savage 99 in 250-3000 for a couple of walks each year. Ever shoot a whitetail with the 250-3000? I bought one from a family member. It's a great shooting gun, but I have always "over gunned" for whitetail. I know that a 100 grain bullet will get the job done, but none of the 20ish deer I shot with my 7 Rem Mag ever complained. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) SWEEET, Stubborn... A very nice caliber...Is your rifle a Savage 99 ? When I first started hunting in the early 1960s a lot of local guys were using them as woodchuck rifles...The .243 was just getting established, the .22-250 was still a wildcat, and the .223 hadn't been born yet. It is an excellent low recoil combo varmint/deer round, every bit as capable as the .243 Win.... I always wished I had picked one up when Remington offered that chambering in their 700 Classic series.. A lot of history in that round with the Savage 99..It was the first cartridge that reached 3000 FPS with a factory load ( albeit with a 87 grain bullet) hence the name 250-3000...Later years it was usually referred to as the 250 Savage... Edited January 25, 2017 by Pygmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACC Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 270, 280 and 30-06 recoil is very similar until you get into the heavier 06'sSent from my iPhone using TapatalkThe 280 is the exact same round as a 7mm mag but it is not a belted round.Very flat shooting round. I own it in a remington mountain rifle as well as the 06 in the mountain rifle. They are both tack drivers' sub .75 moa.Sent from my SM-G900T3 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Not exactly....They use the same bullets, but the 7mm Rem mag has a considerably larger case capacity than the .280, and is capable of higher velocities with equal bullet weights.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckmaster7600 Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 The 280 is the exact same round as a 7mm mag but it is not a belted round.Very flat shooting round. I own it in a remington mountain rifle as well as the 06 in the mountain rifle. They are both tack drivers' sub .75 moa.Sent from my SM-G900T3 using TapatalkThe only thing that's the same is the projectile. The 7mag has a case capacity of 82 or 83gn h2o, and I'm pretty sure 280 is about 68gn h20 its at least 12 or 14 more grains capacity. That's what gives it its 150ish fps gains over the 280. Really negligible gains but it the 7mm has magnum in the name and that sells.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stubborn1VT Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Pygmy, The rifle is a Savage 99, and it's a shooter. The trigger has been lightened to around 4lbs, and it has almost no recoil. I have a couple boxes of ammo for it, and I don't think ammo is as scarce as some other calibers. I'm not sure I can bring myself to carry it. I'm pretty partial to my 7 Rem Mag. I thought the 7mm was .284, not .280? I'm surprised there's not more difference in capacity between it and the 7mm-08. They look pretty different to me when you put them side-by-side. One big difference IMO is recoil. I'm fairly well used to the Mag, but the 7mm-08 is a dream to shoot in comparison. The only reason I shoot the Mag is that my best friend gave it to me years ago. He bought it for himself, and couldn't get used to the recoil. He was used to the .308. After outshooting him with it several times he told me to keep it. I've shot 20 or so deer with it, a few coyotes, and a bunch of woodchucks. It would be hard to switch deer rifles for me. The model 99 will stay in the safe for now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 You are correct..7MM is .284 ".... 280 is just Remington's label for their cartridge when they developed it to compete with Winchester's 270, which uses .277" bullets, by the way. American cartridges are a real hodgepodge of labels which are often misleading...Some are even named after people who developed them, like the .257 Roberts and the .416 Taylor... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckmaster7600 Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Pygmy, The rifle is a Savage 99, and it's a shooter. The trigger has been lightened to around 4lbs, and it has almost no recoil. I have a couple boxes of ammo for it, and I don't think ammo is as scarce as some other calibers. I'm not sure I can bring myself to carry it. I'm pretty partial to my 7 Rem Mag. I thought the 7mm was .284, not .280? I'm surprised there's not more difference in capacity between it and the 7mm-08. They look pretty different to me when you put them side-by-side. One big difference IMO is recoil. I'm fairly well used to the Mag, but the 7mm-08 is a dream to shoot in comparison. The only reason I shoot the Mag is that my best friend gave it to me years ago. He bought it for himself, and couldn't get used to the recoil. He was used to the .308. After outshooting him with it several times he told me to keep it. I've shot 20 or so deer with it, a few coyotes, and a bunch of woodchucks. It would be hard to switch deer rifles for me. The model 99 will stay in the safe for now. If you like the 7 mm rem mag but like the recoil of the 7mm08 why not split the difference and get something in 7mm express Not much slower than the mag with a lot less recoil and better velocities than the little 7mm-08. The great thing about rifle cartridges is we really can have our cake and eat it too.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pygmy Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 10 minutes ago, Buckmaster7600 said: If you like the 7 mm rem mag but like the recoil of the 7mm08 why not split the difference and get something in 7mm express Not much slower than the mag with a lot less recoil and better velocities than the little 7mm-08. The great thing about rifle cartridges is we really can have our cake and eat it too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Hehehehehehe....You, Sir, are a turd poker......<<wink>>.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stubborn1VT Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 I'd just get a 7mm-08, but the Mag was FREE. I don't shoot it for fun, but it does kill deer. I have an issue with calibers with seriously expensive ammo. My Mag likes $24 blue box Federals from Walmart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coachdad Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) On 12/28/2016 at 8:39 AM, Salmon_Run said: I am looking at a new Remington model 700 Mountain SS, rifle chambered in .280. It is weather proof, bomb proof and lightweight. I love my Kimber 84 but cry carrying that in the big woods swamps in the rain and snow. Any thoughts guys ? I would likely top it with a 3x9 scope and use it in Western New York as well as it is a flat, hard hitting round suited for open fields as well... Edited February 17, 2017 by Coachdad My comment didn't show up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coachdad Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Did you end up getting the Remington? It will certainly do the job on whitetails. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmon_Run Posted February 17, 2017 Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 I am in fact getting the Remington and know they fit very well to my shooting form. It is light, fast and looks very durable.... Thanks all for a great discussion.... Dan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 13 minutes ago, Salmon_Run said: I am in fact getting the Remington and know they fit very well to my shooting form. It is light, fast and looks very durable.... Thanks all for a great discussion.... Dan Gotta see pics!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmon_Run Posted February 17, 2017 Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 Scope shopping now !!!! I will add some range pictures when I get it completed.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 17 minutes ago, Salmon_Run said: Scope shopping now !!!! I will add some range pictures when I get it completed.... What glass are you pondering? I vote for VX 3 (varix III or VXIII ??) 2.5x8 or if you MUST, a fixed 4 Leupold would work too........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmon_Run Posted February 17, 2017 Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 Great looking piece of glass and a very reasonable price point.... Leupold VX-3i Rifle Scope 3.5-10x 40mm Matte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawdwaz Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 16 minutes ago, Salmon_Run said: Leupold VX-3i Rifle Scope 3.5-10x 40mm Matte That was my favorite for a number of years but now the 2.5-8 has replaced it. Good luck and get shopping!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmon_Run Posted February 17, 2017 Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 3.5 for the dense woods of Northern zone and 10 for open farm fields in the Southern zone and a great quality glass for the money.. I know I'll be happy at the range and field with this combo.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coachdad Posted February 19, 2017 Share Posted February 19, 2017 On 2/17/2017 at 6:21 PM, Salmon_Run said: Great looking piece of glass and a very reasonable price point.... Leupold VX-3i Rifle Scope 3.5-10x 40mm Matte Good luck with the set-up... may you shoot many deer with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmon_Run Posted February 24, 2017 Author Share Posted February 24, 2017 Thanks guys for a fun string of posts here !!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailinghudson25 Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 There are 2 types of adirondacks..... Open forested areas... something medium range like your 280, 270, or 30-06 wil do. Open scopes are nice, but some power in lower light to make sure your bullet is not going to skip on a branch.... I bring a remington ADL in 30-06 with 180gr cor-lokt heads. I got the a burris fullfield II in 3-9x40. If the hunt is more of a hike, I bring a glenfiled model 30 with lyman peep sight. I like the 150gr cor-lokt heads in my reloads. However, most of the time I'm hunting swamp edges and regrowth spots in my club's leased paper company land. I am getting close to see them and they may see me and be spooked. I want some horsepower incase a shot get a bit sloppy. I got a browning BLR in 450 marlin with a 1.25-4.5x32 bushnell elite 3200 scope. I'd hunt in those open spots with these too if the hunt takes me there. If the hunt is more of a scout mission, or I am checking cameras or have the gun on the ATV rack, the glenfield 30 is coming with me. Without a scope, it feels like I'm fielding a 22. Alot of calibers will work.. The real trick is scope tuning. Get that scope to fit you like a glove. You may need to adjust the hieght of the rings, or adjust the scope forward or back. I put the scope on loose and spend 15 minutes playing with it. High power, low power, offhand, kneeling, bench, sitting in a small chair point down like in a treestand. That extra second you gain finding the recticle and seeing through it well can make all the difference out there. You may get a second for a shot. A well adjusted scope mount will give you 2 seconds........ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padre86 Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 What open areas are there in the Adirondacks? Except for lakes and blow-down, I haven't encountered many clearings up there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmon_Run Posted March 15, 2017 Author Share Posted March 15, 2017 7 hours ago, Padre86 said: What open areas are there in the Adirondacks? Except for lakes and blow-down, I haven't encountered many clearings up there. You must hunt near me !!!! I travel 3 miles going one mile map distance getting around swamps, creeks, blow downs, witch hobble and alders..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.