Doc

Yes, sometimes a video clip can be like a certain phrase being taken out of context to prove something that indeed is not a fact. When my sign was stolen, that thought did run through my mind that perhaps I was a bit too close to the road and someone may have legally confiscated it. That probably was not the case, but I suppose it is possible. One looks at the picture and sees mowed lawn and assumes that it was on private property. A mowed lawn does not indicate any kind of boundary. I see all kinds of properties where the home owner mows right to the shoulder of the road. That does not mean that just because he mows it, that it is his private land. I can see a point of view where someone could look at a sign containing political information being placed on public property as being something that should be legally removed. And I doubt tat there is any requirement that the official needs to go find the owner and tell him that it is being confiscated. However, in this case, regardless of the legalities, that may be simply being a jerk ( my version of sanitizing my language .... lol), but may not fit the definition of being theft.

Well, maybe I have heard some celebrations with remarks that are kind of on the edge. Things like "what a pig!", or "he's a real toad" or "What a slob". What the heck is that all about? Of all the things you could call an animal that you just killed, maybe these aren't exactly the right sentiments to be put out on TV. I know that they are just trying to use the "cool" language of the day, but it can really be taken the wrong way. No, I don't get down on my knees and start praying to the deer gods or any such rituals, but I guess I wouldn't feel right about calling the slain animal derogatory names. I don't think it is funny, cute, or cool.

So what happens when the guns start to go off? Do they drive the deer right out of the park? It might be useful to find out where their favorite escape routes are...... somehow.

Also make sure that even when you think you have solved the problem that you aren't still making some contact. It isn't always obvious, but slightest contact can be devastating to shooting accuracy.

The initial question was about "the most prevalent game violation", not the most prevalent ticket issued. But anyway to answer your question, I have never heard of anyone who has gotten a ticket for not reporting a kill. I believe that somewhere in NYS probably there have been a few written. But here is what I do not understand.... If the DEC claims that 40% of the hunters do not report their kill, why aren't we hearing about tickets being issued all over the place? That 40% number is arrived at by running all over the place checking deer carcasses (Taxidermy shops, camps, deer processors, etc.) and then comparing those to the reports turned in. So that means that they have found a pile of hunters who were breaking that law. So where's the tickets?

My wife used to help run a 3-mile trapline years ago. She covered areas that I didn't have time to check during the week. She's also my fishing buddy. She never got big into hunting, but did take her hunter safety training for both gun and bow.

Ha ... a little late to the party, but .... I am not able to see the video, but only the link that shows the still pictures. But I am generally a little slow to jump to conclusions about motives or reasons. I am not sure that the sign was on private property in which case if it was in violation, would not be technically "theft", but more likely would be considered code enforcement. The guy would have to have a huge set if he pulled his plainly marked patrol car over and illegally removed a sign from private property. I'm not saying that it is impossible, just saying it is kind of unlikely. especially considering the fact that a patrol vehicle generally attracts a lot of attention.

Nice big bucks dining on a pile of dropped pears in broad daylight? .... I thought I heard that that just simply doesn't ever happen ..... lol. Sorry .... I couldn't help myself.

Yeah, I really didn't get the whole purpose of including that in the syllabus. None of it is anything that they were even commenting on pro or con. Definitely is not a list of items that have DEC support.

Many reasons for string/arm interference. 1. Draw length is too long, and you are stretching too much to reach your anchor. This is not a good time to be messing with that one. 2. Material for hunting coat is too bulky or too many layers of clothing. Buy an armguard that goes from wrist to upper arm..... or ..... Use an ace bandage (I think that's what they are called)..... or ..... I have also heard of using a length of nylon stocking to restrain the sleeve. 3. Shooting stance is too open. Turn into the target more. Not a real easy thing to change at this point with the season only a couple days away. 4. As has been mentioned, the elbow is turned in. Practice turning it out. Most of these things are very ugly to discover at this stage of the year and can take some time to retrain shooting stance or style or modify your bow's draw length. Here is some potentially worse news. When the temperature starts dipping into the lower 20s or upper teens, you may be forced to pile on even more layers of clothing. So it is wise to check out that stuff as well or towards the end of the season you may have to address this problem again.

I believe I have also heard the 40% figure. With that high a percentage, this has to rank right up there as the frequent violation. Even the shots that I hear before and after legal hunting hours doesn't come up to anywhere near 40%.

With all the great reasons to quit these days, deer hunting concerns are pretty far down the priority list.

Do you have a web address for the location of this info? I'd like to read the context and details and background of these proposals.

Yes, they rely on Citizen Task Forces (CFT) in each WMU to come up with recommended deer densities that do not conflict with the activities of represented stake-holders. see http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7207.html for a look at that process. As I have been led to believe from what I have read and a few seminars here and there, deer populations are established through the black art of statistical analysis computer programs with all kinds of inputs of some calculated harvest stats, a few formulas, a pinch of constants, and a dash of factors, and poof! ..... out pops a population number. Then that number is thrown in with the wish-list of deer densities that all the stake-holders of the CFT have agreed on, then stirred around with some more formulas, constants, and factors and out comes the number for the permits that are to be issued. Occasionally the number is about right, but there never is any physical verification methods applied, so we simply have to take their word for it that all is well .....lol.

Ha-ha..... We bowhunters sure do enjoy publicly maligning our bowhunting community don't we. These kinds of threads that advertise how many bad archers we have out there definitely leaves the impression that there are only about a dozen archers that are fit to actually be out there hunting .... lol. You would think that all the PETA folks would have to do would be to publish a few of these threads in some public media to get their points across.

Yes, there is lot more than simple training at work here. I think there are a lot fewer hours of actual hunting being logged these days as opposed to decades ago. I have made a thing out of watching the local state lands parking lots, and taking note of the actual amount of shooting that goes on locally. I have also noted that after opening day, it begins to sound quieter than your typical day o small-game season. No there are no real records on such things. About the closest thing you can follow is license sales figures, but that does not indicate the actual hours afield. So the best you can do is simply get a feel for a perceived downturn in activity. Naturally a downturn in activity would cut severely into the number of accidents. I also agree that the style of hunting can turn back accident numbers. Much of this is due to the fantastic hunting clothes that allow hunters to stay in one place without being froze out of their stands. I know we like to take credit for our hunter safety programs being responsible, and I don't doubt that they too have an impact on the numbers. But I think there is a lot more afoot that impacts these numbers that is not really getting credit.

Some of these lease situations become a bidding war. When people used to say that hunting would become a rich man's sport, it turns out that they may have been right. It sure is getting worse every year. Thank heavens for state land, but really with more and more people losing hunting access, how many hunters can the state land continue to accommodate? I realize that money was not the issue in your situation (Although it could have turned out that way). But the situation relates to the same thing ..... competition for hunting access. It's getting brutal. The costs of vacant hunting land have gotten absolutely ridiculous (because people are willing to pay whatever is asked). The amount of money that hunters are willing to drop for hunting leases has become a joke. And granting permission for hunting has gotten nearly non-existent. Today you have to be a good beggar or become slave laborer to obtain hunting permission. And now the small amount of land that is open has become a mud-wrestling match to hang onto. So what does all this say about the future of hunting?

Was it a real misunderstanding or just a case of cold feet after they realized the level of trouble they could be in for stealing that volume of expensive equipment?

It's ok if people decide not to shoot 1.5 year olds. I have no problem with whatever people decide to do for their own personal goals. We also have people that believe that 2.5 year olds should not be shot. I support their individual choice. There are others that keep wanting to push the age limit even higher. As a personal goal, I can't fault them. I actually believe there are hunters that would just as soon not even shoot anything, and that personal view is also respected by me. But none of that is the same as mandating these goals for everyone. That's a whole different kettle of fish. That's the point where we have to get serious about real, tangible, and significant reasons to put that into law. Because whether we like it or not, there are some real reasons for not taking that choice out of the hunter's hands.

It is an amazing reaction that happens to you when a gun unexpectedly goes off behind you. The first reaction was dead silence for a couple of seconds with everybody looking at each other in disbelief. Oh, and then all hell broke loose. It's some scary stuff!

That probably does not indicate a reliance on milk. Even the late births are into forage products by now.

That's funny, I was just wondering about that myself. My theory is that in this electronic media age, we are simply hearing about it more often. All the reports on here would have never even been heard about a bunch of years ago. Also, there is the fact that more and more "things" are being installed in the woods. So the opportunities have risen.

Have those changes to license structure and costs been officially put into law yet or gotten to a point where they are set in stone? The subject seems to have gone completely quiet.

What's bugging me is that I am getting to the age where vigorous activity to stay in shape is not working anymore. Example: I've had to give up some of the weight training machines at the "Y" because of muscle and joint injuries. A few weeks ago vigorous hoeing in the garden caused tendinitis in my elbow .... serious archery problem if it had been allowed to do too far. Hoeing for God's sake! Endurance on long hikes has faltered. Hip problems are taking their toll. So, much of what used to keep me in shape is being forced to the sidelines. The fact is that eventually, all our best intentions will slowly be screwed up by age. It gets to the point where you just do what you can and hope that's good enough. Even worse than staying in ready shape for hunting is the fact that there is a huge correlation between exercise and blood pressure. Reduced exercise turns into sky-rocketing blood pressure. And there is the same relationship with blood-sugar. So these vital keys to longevity are directly hooked to something that you get less and less able to do. Now there is a scary scenario.

Seriously ...... I have no idea of the cost of that kind of technology, but what a great idea. Of course it would have to be attached somewhere where you would have to destroy the item to disable the tracking device. Imagine the money that could be made if you found a cheap way to produce such a thing. You watch .... some day somebody will take your idea and get stinking rich on it.