Jump to content

DoubleDose

Members
  • Content Count

    296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

DoubleDose last won the day on January 29

DoubleDose had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

286 Excellent

About DoubleDose

  • Rank
    New York Hunter

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 1) This is an opinion editorial 2) Lott is not a lawyer The last paragraph of same article: It is impossible to get in Judge Cahill’s mind and figure out why he let the prosecutors act the way they did. The bottom line is that these rules exist for a reason, and violating them made it so that Chauvin didn’t get a fair trial. That is something that should concern everyone. The role of the judge is to ensure the defendant gets a fair trial, not a perfect trial. If the judge felt this imperfect trial was unfair he would then declare a mistrial. I'd be more interested in this
  2. So she is explicitly inciting a riot. Only DJT is not allowed to implicitly do that.
  3. This is liberal logic. You choose to use drugs but then are not responsible for your actions.
  4. While he calls it the AFT, instead of ATF, it technically is not ATF either. It is BATFE. After the domestic terrorism bombing of the Federal building, explosives was added to their jurisdiction. It is embarrassing and sad that this man is POTUS!
  5. This is just a Lib/Dem workaround to have a national healthcare system that pays for this. Individuals desiring gender reassignment surgery without the medical insurance or financial means will join the military to have this done at taxpayer expense. This has nothing to do with what is best for the military or best use of DOD dollars.
  6. DeBlasio, Cuomo, and the Lib/Dems all initially did not call these incidents out as Asian hate crime because it was not fitting the narrative of white supremacy. It was the Dem and Repub Asians that called it out for what it was and forced it out into the open. The "people" that stood and watched were security guards! They say they called the police but the NYPD said there was NO 911 call for this incident and a patrol unit happened to come upon the scene. NYC sucks!
  7. This only works in theory. The criminals defense attorney will plead down these charges for a guilty plea. Sentencing is up to the judge so years will be reduced. After a while of this type of sentencing, the Libs will again argue there are too many people in prison for too long, too expensive a sentence, et etc etc. Reality: NYC has a law of mandatory 1 year added to sentence for any crime committed with an illegal handgun; at the discretion of the sentencing judge. Oxymoron right there, mandatory and at the discretion. The ONLY person to receive this sentence was Bernard Getz.
  8. NCM, agree this is an accurate assessment of the current state of affairs. This is primarily due to the education system, mainstream media, and the powerful brainwashing the masses about 2A. It is the responsibility of gun owners to correct that brainwashing and never throw in the towel. Look at the history, as criminals use different guns in high profile crimes those guns become highly regulated or illegal (tommy gun, sawed off shotgun, Saturday night special, AKs, ARs, etc). The criminal minority causes the loss of rights of the majority. Hunters, as gun owners, need to unders
  9. NCM, what I wrote is not a POV. The anti-gun community wants you to think and believe this is an opinion, point of view, or belief. It is factual documented (Federalist papers) history. I do not agree with "And consequently, the opposition ( I.e. We 2 nd amendment supporters ) has conceded much in its acquiescence and acceptance of this new reality." We, the opposition, have been forced to accept these unconstitutional laws or become criminals. You state "try to prevent further erosion of our rights ." One of our founding fathers said "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance". As G
  10. You don't understand the second amendment. It was not written to preserve your right to have hunting and shooting arms. It was written to preserve your right to have arms to go to war with. It was intended for civilians to have equal footing with the military. ARs and AKs are precisely the arms it was written to preserve/protect; and it is the ONLY individual right that includes "shall not be infringed". For those who want to make the argument it was written at a time when the arms were muskets, and the founders could not have imagined AR & AKs, freedom of speech was written at a
  11. That is a dangerous strategy. The SCOTUS gets to pick and choose which cases they will hear; and historically they rule VERY narrowly.
  12. The Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna vaccines have proven they are safe (over 75 million doses given) but if you want the J&J vaccine, which is less effective, that is your choice. Holding out to 2022 is putting your life at risk. COVID19 can result in death; including young healthy individuals with no risk factors treated in good hospitals. The virus will not be eradicated and will still be around. Although it is expected we will have herd immunity by then, the purpose of the vaccine is also so that the individual has some immunity to prevent disease. There has been zero fatality from
  13. What is there to say? Saudi Arabia killing a journalist is the same as China killing the Uighur muslims. They just have, "you know the thing," different societal norms! C'mon man!
  14. Immigration rules and law is more than just protecting US jobs or benefitting the immigrants life. It is also about protecting the health of Americans. His policy and position ignores the fact that the illegal immigrants (aliens) can be carrying other infectious diseases like tuberculosis, hepatitis, etc
×
×
  • Create New...