jusputtn Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Found this on NYFirearms forums. Mayors against illegal guns is passing this poll around to the libs. Lets go even it out.https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/113/x101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5.9cummins Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 I just took it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 already took it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Ha-ha-ha ..... did you see the statement that goes along with an opposing vote? Here check it out: “I oppose Common Sense Legislation to End Gun Violence.” Is that a slanted, forced response or what? What a joke. They are forcing pro-gun forces to publicly state that they are against common sense legislation to end gun violence. Never mind that to date there has not ever been such a thing ..... lol. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jusputtn Posted March 29, 2013 Author Share Posted March 29, 2013 They are using common sense out of context. Pretty simple definition. You'd think they could get it right, just takes a little common sense. Definition of COMMON SENSE: sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 They are using common sense out of context. Pretty simple definition. You'd think they could get it right, just takes a little common sense. Definition of COMMON SENSE: sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts I don't think that is by accident or oversight. I think you are dealing with an anti-gun minded entity who has carefully crafted the poll to make it a no-win situation for any pro-gun respondants. The way they worded that response is exactly the wording that will be sent to legislators in our name. I did not participate because I don't want to be handing them my e-mail address and when I send a message to my legislators, I don't want to word it so that I sound like a buffoon indicating that I oppose common sense approaches to anything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 I think liberals have a different definition of the term "common sense" than the rest of civilization. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 I think liberals have a different definition of the term "common sense" than the rest of civilization. That's why I don't want them framing my responses to my legislators for me. I have already taken care of that in my own words. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jusputtn Posted March 30, 2013 Author Share Posted March 30, 2013 You may want to check out this Popov thing more. I checked out a few more things on their site and there are normal statements on other bills. I had added my personal comment to the poll and I believe that it went through. I also just responded to the UN Arms Treaty question. That's another big item that we should be protesting but I think we are busy with our own government at the moment. Here's the link. http://www.popvox.com/blog/2013/issue-spotlight-firearms-113th/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ants Posted March 30, 2013 Share Posted March 30, 2013 A typical liberal ploy is for the liberal to write the definitions. "common sense" is what they define as common sense.. Racism is what they define as racism ..sexism...bigotry... it goes on and on. Its an easy way for them to win the argument. Being able to load only 7 rounds in your 8 round magazine, to protect yourself and your family in own your home , is defined by some as common sense ,yet being allowed to load the same gun with 8 or 10 rounds, while target shooting at a range is also considered, by the same ilk , to be common sense. Really?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 What’s your position on Common Sense Legislation to End Gun Violence Washington needs to pass gun laws that will keep guns out of the hands of criminals and other prohibited purchasers and keep military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines off of our streets. To do this, they should pass laws that will: 1. Require criminal background checks for ALL gun sales, including private sales. 2. Ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. 3. Make gun trafficking a federal crime. (Proposed by: Mayors Against Illegal Guns.) You know, if you just simply read the wording, it's not all that hard to figure out which side of the gun control issue these people are on. This is a good example of phrasing poll questions so that they come out with a pre-determined outcome. You can learn a lot about poll manipulation just from this one here. It also tells you plenty about the idealogical bent of these people. The phrasing of the question, and the little editorial touch on the answers says so much about this outfit. These are not people that I want to associate my name with in any way shape or fashion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ELMER J. FUDD Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Yep I see some of their favorite buzz words. Military style and oh wait a minute, what's that at the bottom? Mayors against illegal guns? Who would have thought? I wonder if they know that putting criminals in jail and keeping them there is the best way to keep guns out of their hands. What is their definition of prohibited purchasers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkln Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 <sarcasm> I propose one amendment to their request since they are against only illegal guns: If the gun is illegal it can hold only 3 bullets If the gun is legal then it has no bullet restrictions Take that Mayors! This should significantly reduce gun violence and it is common sense.... </sarcasm> 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ants Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Problem is that there are enough people out there who don't see through the wording B.S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyantler Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 I'm not sure but isn't gun trafficing already a federal crime?... or is it just a crime commited by the feds??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.