Jump to content

Is it just NY schools


Borngeechee
 Share

Recommended Posts

Are you guys noticing this or is it just NY (Long Island to be exact) ... One of my girls is in 3rd grade and she is learning world history but none of it includes US history. Hell they've learned about China, India and they haven't anything about here. I asked her if they ever spoke about George Washington and they haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you guys noticing this or is it just NY (Long Island to be exact) ... One of my girls is in 3rd grade and she is learning world history but none of it includes US history. Hell they've learned about China, India and they haven't anything about here. I asked her if they ever spoke about George Washington and they haven't.

When I was in school, "world history" & "U S history were taught in 2 different classes. " World history" encompasses thousands of years while "U S history" is barely 400 years.

I went to school in PA as well as IL.

Edited by wildcat junkie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was in school, "world history" & "U S history were taught in 2 different classes. " World history" encompasses thousands of years while "U S history" is barely 400 years.

I went to school in PA as well as IL.

It was the same for me but at least by the 3rd grade we knew who the first president was.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get out a new edition of a public school US History text and read it.

 

It's attitudes like that that encourage the indoctrination and dumbing down of American public school children.

 

Edited by Mr VJP
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can find all the information you want in this one book.

 

48 Liberal Lies About American History: (That You Probably Learned in School)   by Prof. Larry Schweikart

 

Over the last forty years, history textbooks have become more and more politically correct and distorted about our country’s past, argues professor Larry Schweikart. The result, he says, is that students graduate from high school and even college with twisted beliefs about economics, foreign policy, war, religion, race relations, and many other subjects.

As he did in his popular A Patriot’s History of the United States, Professor Schweikart corrects liberal bias by rediscovering facts that were once widely known. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is that i don't get how she isn't being taught US History. I understand it's a seperate class, but it's still a class that she doesn't have. Hell when I was a kid we had the president posted all around the class.

Edited by Borngeechee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get out a new edition of a public school US History text and read it.

It's attitudes like that that encourage the indoctrination and dumbing down of American public school children.

Don't change the subject. We weren't discussing the state of our education system. We were discussing your comment that teachers are now teaching anti-American history in schools.

The weather is nice out. Get outside and just stop with the nonsense already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, attitudes like that.  You haven't a clue, yet you think you do.  That's the scary thing.

 

I repeat, get a US History text from your local school system and read it.  It's subtle, but the message is no longer America is an exceptional land and the greatest country on earth.  It's more judgmental about US history with a tendency to imply guilt.  Read some of the links I posted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's subtle, but the message is no longer America is an exceptional land and the greatest country on earth. It's more judgmental about US history with a tendency to imply guilt. Read some of the links I posted.

If you take the standard of living for the general populous, we aren't the "greatest country on earth" any more. Edited by wildcat junkie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I can recall correctly, the first world history they are taught is what First-Light described which is to just teach the kids there are different cultures.  When US history is introduced, it is a lot more detailed (have to remember dates, declarations, wars, key individuals, etc) so it's usually when the kids are a little older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In third grade the curriculum looks at the cultures around the world. Have you gone to a parent teacher meeting lately?

I go to all of them and the ones I don't I'm there via speakers phone. I'm going to ask at the next one since this didn't come up until today.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In third grade the curriculum looks at the cultures around the world. Have you gone to a parent teacher meeting lately?

 

If I recall the guy is a grandpa. And while he claims we're all out of touch with reality, he constantly posts links to nut-job fueled websites so I'm not sure he's any more qualified then anyone else to address the education system problems. I think our schools need a lot of help, but I certainly do not believe our schools are teaching our kids to be anti-American. That's just nuts.

 

Now it's also common knowledge that history books are written by the victors. Taking a deeper look into some our cultural struggles with slavery, discrimination, the slaughtering of native Americans is the appropriate way to teach history. Rome was great, but a lot of people died along the way. How would we expect our kids to learn from our mistakes if we don't tell them about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Studies also generally ranks as the most boring subject if you poll students, with U.S. history leading the way.

 

If only I had focused on math, science, and common sense in high school and early college rather than Chesterton, the Romans, our independence, and UN and Caribbean politics...little of that stuff paid any value to me from a career perspective. 

 

I do not discredit the value of learning our history, but at the same point and time, I would be fine if we cut the amount of history exposure in the curriculum in half and moved toward experiential learning (ie practicing things you learn) that might pay dividend career-wise. We have a ton of local colleges in my area, and pretty much all undergrads coming through my doors are equal regardless of degree, with the exception of one/two schools. They can talk about what they learned. A college like RIT, which is very experiential (required co-ops and internships), produces much better people/employees/long term careers. I find that they can do, and not simply talk about doing. Again, I do not discredit the value of learning our history, but at the same token, I feel like our school system should better prepare students for college or trades. Spending a week on the Mayan civilization or our western expansion seems like it isn't the best bang for the buck.

Edited by phade
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...