Deerstalker Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Eleven hurt, suspect killed in 'terrifying' Ohio State attack https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/94540050/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattler Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 It's wrong to call this guy an "active shooter" when he killed people with a car and a knife. He did not have a gun. I smell an agenda here. Why not tell the truth and call it a murderer on a rampage? Just proves if all guns were taken away, it only makes the murderer's task easier and longer. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerstalker Posted November 29, 2016 Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 53 minutes ago, Rattler said: It's wrong to call this guy an "active shooter" when he killed people with a car and a knife. He did not have a gun. I smell an agenda here. Why not tell the truth and call it a murderer on a rampage? Just proves if all guns were taken away, it only makes the murderer's task easier and longer. The only gun that was used was the gun the cop used to stop him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattler Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 And that may be because no personal concealed carry weapons are allowed on that campus. If a concealed carrier had killed him, the media would not be supporting it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Just another devout Islamist who really really wanted his 72 virgins. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 White House Warns Against Blaming Religion of Islam After Ohio State Attack http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/29/white-house-warns-blaming-muslim-religion-islamic-state-inspired-attack/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 This just reinforces the fact that King Barack is an IDIOT ! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerstalker Posted November 30, 2016 Author Share Posted November 30, 2016 2 hours ago, fasteddie said: This just reinforces the fact that King Barack is an IDIOT ! Or a muslim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diplomat019 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 33 minutes ago, Deerstalker said: Or a muslim Obama is a christian. Idiot maybe. But not muslim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerstalker Posted November 30, 2016 Author Share Posted November 30, 2016 6 minutes ago, diplomat019 said: Obama is a christian. Idiot maybe. But not muslim. Dont no dont care at this point glad he is going soon . Hope he has a nice life in dubia or where ever he chooses to go play golf at . By muslim law technically he is Muslim by the way in there Sharia law if your father is a,muslim you are one does not even matter what he believes . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 1 hour ago, diplomat019 said: Obama is a christian. Idiot maybe. But not muslim. It doesn't matter what his 'religion' is. His core beliefs are wholly anti-American, rooted in his acceptance of the concept of Radical Islamic Extremism as a viable political tool. He's shown this to be the case throughout his tenure as POTUS. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Donald Trump: Ohio State Attacker ’Should Not Have Been in Our Country’ http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/30/trump-ohio-state-attacker-not-country/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diplomat019 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 14 minutes ago, philoshop said: It doesn't matter what his 'religion' is. His core beliefs are wholly anti-American, rooted in his acceptance of the concept of Radical Islamic Extremism as a viable political tool. He's shown this to be the case throughout his tenure as POTUS. To be honest it seems like hes following suit of his predecessors. We are sending more troops to the middle east. We are continuing to nation build. We are involved in propping up new regimes. We are killing people everyday (muslims in the middle east). Gitmo is up and running. I keep asking this. If he is accepting of islam why is he pro war? We bomb and kill an unprecedented number of muslims. Seems status quo to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Core Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Trump is a loudmouth but nobody else in government is going to speak out about this. Islam is disproportionately represented in terror attacks. Muslim immigrants are disproportionately represented in terror attacks. This is all undeniable statistics. Completely undeniable, and not just a mildly statistically significant observation but a massive one. Few in government want to talk about it because it is not politically correct and many want to shoehorn muslims into a victim class because they are not the predominant religion. As such they will desperately apply cognitive dissonance to how they look at the matter because progressivism has trained them to never criticize anything but the majority. Trump has come in at a crucial time because I do not want to see this country go the way Europe has gone. Four years from now Europe will be suffering even more massively for its unchecked immigration and hopefully by then we can use it as a more present example. I do not hold great hope in that, though, because the progressive left seems to find no problem in taking in immigrants from anywhere, even those with backward cultures that are wholly incompatible with the west and which all too frequently resort to violence in the furtherance of their culture. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 26 minutes ago, diplomat019 said: To be honest it seems like hes following suit of his predecessors. We are sending more troops to the middle east. We are continuing to nation build. We are involved in propping up new regimes. We are killing people everyday (muslims in the middle east). Gitmo is up and running. I keep asking this. If he is accepting of islam why is he pro war? We bomb and kill an unprecedented number of muslims. Seems status quo to me. I'm not following your argument here. Mr. Obama is not "pro war". At least not in the same sense that the Bushes and Clintons have been, because they were only interested in the money. Obama is simply willing to sacrifice a number of radical jihadists and Americans to accomplish his ends, just like any other Radical Islamic leader. He's an ideologue trying to take down Western Civilization. Nothing more, nothing less. He'll ride with anyone who will help him with that goal. War, peace, and the reality of those options mean nothing to him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diplomat019 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 6 minutes ago, philoshop said: I'm not following your argument here. Mr. Obama is not "pro war". At least not in the same sense that the Bushes and Clintons have been, because they were only interested in the money. Obama is simply willing to sacrifice a number of radical jihadists and Americans to accomplish his ends, just like any other Radical Islamic leader. He's an ideologue trying to take down Western Civilization. Nothing more, nothing less. He'll ride with anyone who will help him with that goal. War, peace, and the reality of those options mean nothing to him. Then why did he kill bin laden? Wouldnt bin laden have been his biggest asset? and if obama isnt a war hawk then idk what is. We have totally dismantled the middle east. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diplomat019 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 11 minutes ago, philoshop said: I'm not following your argument here. My argument was that he was called anti american. When his axtions prove that he is doing the same stuff as presidents before him. Bombing the middle east. Killing muslims. Killing anyone in the path of the bomb actually. A dr without horders was blown to shreds. Nation building. Propping up dictators. His actions fall in line with bush. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 14 minutes ago, diplomat019 said: Then why did he kill bin laden? Wouldnt bin laden have been his biggest asset? and if obama isnt a war hawk then idk what is. We have totally dismantled the middle east. If you've been paying attention, what we've done over the last 8 years is destabilize the ME, by dismantling the stabilizing powers that were actually there. These actions have directly helped the Islamic caliphate to increase their presence and power in the region. Killing bin Laden was at best a token gesture to entertain the Americans, in Obama's view. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 There is no proof Bin Laden was killed. I suspect he died years before from Kidney failure. He needed daily dialysis 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philoshop Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 22 minutes ago, diplomat019 said: My argument was that he was called anti american. When his axtions prove that he is doing the same stuff as presidents before him. Bombing the middle east. Killing muslims. Killing anyone in the path of the bomb actually. A dr without horders was blown to shreds. Nation building. Propping up dictators. His actions fall in line with bush. As I said before, Obama has never cared about who died under his watch on either 'side'. His end goal has always been to undermine the strength and sovereignty of the U.S., and unfortunately he's been pretty effective at it. The scum who came before him did it for money. Obama has done it with the direct intent of destroying our country. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerstalker Posted November 30, 2016 Author Share Posted November 30, 2016 1 hour ago, Papist said: There is no proof Bin Laden was killed. I suspect he died years before from Kidney failure. He needed daily dialysis I have no idea if obama got bin laden or he was already dead since obama the idiot decided to get ride of the body and i have not seen any video of what happend or his body . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Field_Ager Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.