Jump to content

Doc

Members
  • Posts

    14626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    158

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Hunting New York - NY Hunting, Deer, Bow Hunting, Fishing, Trapping, Predator News and Forums

Media Demo

Links

Calendar

Store

Everything posted by Doc

  1. It's the one's that don't think about these things that bother me. And there's way too many of them out there. As long as I continue to be surprised by guys on heavily pressured state land on opening day that are dressed in head to toe camo (including face paint) or read about such things on this or any forum, you can count on me speaking out against such things. And if it takes graphic examples to get the point across, so be it. I understand that it's not a pleasant subject, but it's not really all that healthy to hide from it either. Doc
  2. Doc

    Early apples

    Yeah, it was that guy, Johnny Appleseed that brought them. I didn't know he was french ......
  3. I once called in a buck by rattling, but he saw me about the same time that I saw him. Other than that one time, I haven't really had any luck. I have to admit though that I really haven't tried it all that much. There's something about sitting out deer hunting making gosh-awful noises that just goes against the grain with me, so I generally just sit there and use more traditional methods of hunting. I do have to admit that there have been times when my noises (other than rattling) have brought in bucks. On two different occasions, bucks have come in when I was clearing some leaves from my stand. More than likely sounded like another buck making a scrape. On two other occasions, deer have shown up while I was clipping limbs out of my shooting lanes. I'm not sure what they thought they were hearing then, but it got their curiosity going. So standing out there making a racket can produce, but it still feels like a strange way to hunt, and while I probably will try it again some day, it most likely will not become a common way of hunting for me. Doc
  4. Here is a little thought that makes it real easy for me to wear blaze orange. Picture the wound on any of the deer that you have seen shot with a 12 guage. Now look at your arm or elbow or stomach and picture that wound there. Doesn't even have to be in a lethal spot. Just picture that. Perhaps that is a good exercise for keeping people from burying their heads in the sand and pretending they are invincible and that nothing bad can ever happen to them. Here's another thought. How many shots have you taken at deer where you could swear with any real certainty that there was nobody tucked away next to some tree way in the background dressed in some of today's hi-tech camo? Unless your hunting on a prairie or a sanctioned backstopped and cleared shooting range you might find that your answer is "never". Does the lack of a blaze orange law only effect the idiot that is out there in camo? Maybe not always. Doc
  5. Don't forget the number of hawks that are around these days. They get their share of bunnies too. Doc
  6. It is amazing that Carhart chose that brown color, and even more amazing that people would wear them out during a deer season. They seem to be decked out with everything but a pair of antlers strapped on their head ..... : . I am constantly amazed by people who could mistake a human for a deer, but I am equally amazed by those that seem to get a kick out of tempting fate by going out and trying like crazy to tempt one of those idiots to shoot them. I don't get it. Doc
  7. Do the tresspassers notify you before they step through the posted line? Seriously, we always think we know who is on our land and when, but the reality is that unless you have an electrified 8' fence around the perimeter, you never know who is there and who isn't. My property is posted such that you are always in sight of 3 bright yellow posted signs at any point along the boundary, and still I occasionally come across trespassers deep inside my land. And a word about "the good ole' boys who make sure its a deer and whats behind it before letting one fly". I truly believe that the only place where you know what's behind (or in front of) what you are shooting at is when you are shooting at a shooting range that has an earthen backstop and all trees and bushes removed between the shooter and the target. I have had guys walk right past me during bow season and never know I was there. Camo works! So to those who feel absolutely safe on their own land during gun season, I can only say that yes, the odds are definitely more in your favor there, but never say never. you have decided to accept the more favorable odds and that is certainly your right, but do not get the feeling that nothing bad can happen. It just isn't so. I would never recommend that anyone go into the woods during a firearms deer season without a generous amount of blaze orange. And that applies to hunters or non-hunters. Also, in my mind there is nothing about a deer drive that requires blaze orange more than any other hunting situation. Doc
  8. I have the same dilemma in my ground stand. My legs won't last through the hours anymore so I spend most of my time sitting on a folding stool. So depending on how the ground blind is constructed, I may have the choice of remaining seated. I have the same problem if the deer decides to take some whacky direction, I may be forced to risk standing up at a time when that is just about impossible to pull off. If I can see the deer coming from a pretty good distance and there is enough cover between us, I prefer to get into a standing position. I know my shooting is better when I stand, and if I have some good big thing to stand behind as part of my blind, I have more mobility and options available. Doc
  9. I'd hate to say how many prime spots have been lost over the years because the landowner decided to sell out or build a house or some other kind of action that has left me looking for a new spot. It's hard enough to get hunting permission to start with without having the land changing hands every so many years. That's one of the reasons that I rely primarily on state land. It may be over crowded, but I know that nobody is going to sell it out from under me. Doc
  10. What's nice about gun season is that you can put on some of the excellent rain-gear available these days and stay dry and comfortable. The extra layer of stuff does not impact your form like it does with a bow and will not interfere with executing the shot. Actually, the best rain-gear that I have is poncho. Lots of air circulation and nothing gets through. Doc
  11. No-no-no-no-no! That's all wrong. I've heard it many times. The right way to do that is to take somebody along that is clearly more gimped up and slower than yourself. That way, you don't have to out-run the bear. All you have to do is out-run the other guy. ;D Doc
  12. Well, you know after you have seen a few hundred kill shots, you kind of get burned out on that stuff. Most of the TV hunting shows are so predicable, you could watch one and pretty much see what's in all of them. First you have the hunter-heros driving to the camp that they are going to hunt out of. Then they have the introductions. Then they might show a bit about the ranch or hunting camp or whatever. Then you see the guy in his stand. Then they have to show a whole bunch of monster bucks that they are passing up because they are not quite what they are looking for. Then the hunter-hero whispers that there is a "shooter" coming. Then the funky 1970's music starts as the buck slowly moves in. He shoots the deer and it runs away with 4/5 of the arrow sticking out of some non-vital part of the deer, but he flashes the thumbs-up signal and starts giggling all over himself. Next thing shows him following the blood trail. Then all of a sudden it's pitch black and the hunter is kneeling behind a well manicured and cleaned up buck and he's telling the viewer how the buck only ran 80 yards and died. That's pretty much all there is to any of the shows. As far as educational, I haven't seen one of those since the video, "Bowhunting October Whitetails" with the Wentzel brothers a jillion years ago. I think I only watch these shows anymore just so I can see how much phoney stuff they're trying to put over on us. Yes they do have an opportunity to do a bit of education if only they would try it once in a while. Even experienced hunters can always use a bit of a brush-up on the basics, and if they would just try, there probably are some little ways of looking at things just a little differently or pointing out some info that maybe never occurred to a lot of us, that could benefit viewers. Yes, I'm afraid I am getting a bit burned out on these scripted hunting tales. I think Jim Shockey probably realizes this too and maybe that's why he's trying a little different approach by trying to show the behind the scenes views of his end of the business. Unfortunately, it's not really working for me. Doc
  13. These kinds of dangerous encounters with wildlife seem to be happening on a more regular basis these days. We seem to have more recent cougar attacks out west with an occasional fatality. There was the 15 year old girl up in Canada that was killed by some coyotes, bear incidents now, occasional deer attacks. It all seems to be increasing quite a bit as time goes on. Is the outdoors gradually becoming a dangerous place, or is it just that now with the internet, we are simply hearing about more of them? Doc
  14. Can they survive our winters?
  15. Ok, I finally got to see another episode of the Jim Shockey show that gave a glimpse into what's behind these TV shows and inspired the original post of this thread. This time I got to see the entire show. The name of it is "The Professionals". Even though this was the second program of this series that I have ever seen, it too was equally depressing. I probably won't be watching it ever again. This latest episode was all about setting up two hunts for a scheduled that they had already committed to deliver before the hunters were even selected. In one scene, I saw 5 different people and the cameraman made it at least 6 different people that were involved in the stalk. It was hunting by committee. There must be some real money involved in that business, because it was plain that this had nothing to do with recreation. It was all dead serious business. As serious as any industry developing a product with delivery dates and drop-dead deadlines. Anyone who thinks that these guys live the perfect life with being able to hunt all the time, ought to see one of those shows. Even Shockey himself had to admit that it is not really fun, but some very serious and difficult work. It all seems like a great way to ruin a perfectly pleasant pastime. Doc
  16. I didn't do as good as usual here in 8N. I only got one permit. That probably will do me just fine anyway. Doc
  17. I have to agree that there are things that run contrary to my personal code of ethics, and legality is only one factor that enters into that kind of judgement. Canned hunts fall into that category. Yes they are legal, and no I do not think they are forms of ethical hunting. You can call them "slaughtering operations", but calling them hunting is a bit offensive and demeaning to most of those of us that hunt "wild" animals. So legality is only one aspect that has to be factored into one's personal code of ethics. It may not even be a major one. Most likely that isn't such a radical position. I'm sure we can all figure out at least one thing that is legal that we don't think is right. The reason for that is that we don't generally leave things like ethics and opinions up to legislators. Doc
  18. Some of you guys have some pretty exotic stands. I would guess that the real benefit of them is just the idea that you can get the heck out of the weather and put in some real time in real comfort. I do think my heights thing would still bother me, but I'm not sure. Do any of you put portable heaters in there with you? Doc
  19. Ok. Ethics and greed ....... two very common human traits. Nothing new, and those traits can be found, to one extent or another, in all of us. And yes it does have an impact on some aspects of hunting and hunting related industries. Ethics has a positive effect and greed has a negative effect...... generally. And no, "deer hunting will never be the same". Also, you will never cram that evil genie back in the bottle. So where do we go from here? Doc
  20. Well, I'm not sure I'm ready to condemn all of capitalism as an evil force that has ruined my hunting. After all, the system here in this country has been pretty darned good to me ...... . Doc
  21. I noticed that one of the threads is missing. In fact it was one that I put a rather lengthy reply on the other day, and I noticed that not only was my reply gone, but the whole thread had disappeared. It was one of the crossbow threads. That's the only one that I have noticed was missing. I assumed that it was some kind of glitch or that someone had posted something there that caused the topic to be removed. Doc
  22. He looks pretty comfy. I don't suppose he would move over enough so you could use the stand too. I suppose it's like the question of what does the 800 pound gorilla do? .......... Anything he wants to. Doc
  23. I suppose it saves a lot of time and effort to have the guy standing there holding the leash while you shoot ................ Just kidding ....... lol. ;D
  24. My guess is that the definitions are cast in stone until, or if, the hunter population drops below a level where the DEC feels they have a viable population control tool. If that should happen, anything is possible and likely in terms of relaxing baiting prohibitions. Doc
×
×
  • Create New...