Rattler

Great pic. The boy made a good choice.

What has any of that got to do with PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION, which was performed exactly as I described it, for which you responded with ignorant insults? (BTW, for your lack of reading comprehension ability, it was not one of my children I delivered on the side of the road.)

There, I fixed it for you. Now the statement is factually correct, though the left and it's lap dog media would have you believe otherwise, to protect their favorite protected class of voters. And yes, Cuomo would be correct to point out the church covered it up, but he wouldn't claim they covered up what is posted above and factually correct.

I was referring to other religions with that post, specifically thinking of one leftist preferred, well protected religion in general. Care to take a shot at that point?

These leftist are attacking people they know would never vote for them, while simultaneously protecting the scum they know will vote for them. Notice how they are all too happy to allow the currently incarcerated and convicted felons to vote.

You are an opinionated, vulgar, fool! If you took the time to look into PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTIONS you would see how it's done. But of course you didn't. You prefer to spout sanctimonious pablum based on your ignorance. I don't know what happened in your personal experience with childbirth, and apparently you don't either. There was obviously a need for doctors and a 2 night stay, but it wasn't anything remotely close to an abortion of a healthy baby. I have 3 children and 2 grand children and as an EMT have actually delivered a baby on the side of the road. Keep your ignorant opinions to yourself if you can't be civil.

The point is, the media feels free to persecute one group while giving others a pass. Why would they do that? Perhaps they are pushing a narrative that is useful to achieve their goals?

It's not a problem in Islam. It's mandatory.

This has nothing to do with pedophiles. Why do you suppose the American left pushes the narrative that it does? "While there may be near unanimity in condemning pedophilia, pederasty is another story. The website of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) insists that such a relationship “is not what you view on television or read in newspapers. It’s not what you hear on Oprah or Geraldo, nor is it the propaganda put out by police and politicians. It’s the love of a man for a boy, and of a boy for a man. Enjoyable, consensual, beautiful.” Furthermore, the website adds, “Our society is beginning to recognize the value and richness of human diversity.” Rahe notes the Catholic Church has provided a home for pederasts for quite some time. He cites a priest named Gerald Fitzgerald, who began counseling priests for their problems with alcoholism, substance abuse, and celibacy in 1947. Fitzgerald also spent a decade trying to alert American bishops and officials in the Vatican that pederasty was a growing problem. He was ignored. So was a 1984 report compiled by Dominican priest Thomas P. O'Doyle, Louisiana attorney F. Ray Mouton Jr., and priest/psychiatrist Michael Peterson, who sent their troubling findings to “every bishop in the country in 1985.” Rahe surmised that the Church’s failure to act was only possible if there were some complicity on the part of the Vatican."

Did either of you two deniers read the articles? They make it perfectly clear it wasn't child molestation, but homosexual predatory abuse of post-pubescent males. That isn't pedophilia. Yes the church covered it up and that is the problem. But it covered up homosexual abuse because there are many homosexuals in the upper echelons of the church, right up to the cardinals in the Vatican. The American left has also covered it up trying to blame pedophiles to deflect scrutiny of homosexuals, when it fact it was homosexuals, not pedophiles. I have a lot of experience with the Catholic church due to my Catholic school education, my family's catholic roots, and my family's funeral home ownership which was closely connected to the church. Many priests have been heard discussing issues with the church's "gay mafia" as they called it. Issues they felt would destroy the church. This is an issue that has been ongoing in the church for over 50 years. It's an undeniable fact. You two guys need to go back and read those articles again.

Diplomat, those articles answer your question about why the church doesn't do anything about the crimes and covers them up. The problem goes to the very top of the church hierarchy. Those at the top are guilty of the same offenses, so they don't want it exposed. Pedastry is pointed out as evidence this is not a pedophile issue, but a homosexual issue. The second article presents more evidence to prove that. The problem here is that homosexuals are a protected class in America and the American public refuses to admit that is where the problem in the church exists. They say it's a crime of pedophilia, but it isn't. It's a crime of predatory abuse of a homosexual nature. Therefore, it is the American political correctness agenda that is covering up for these Catholic issues also. Christianity isn't to blame as much as homosexuality is.

Cuomo would be just one of our elected hacks that should be called out by the church.

This is why. They protect their own. https://patriotpost.us/articles/58086-the-catholic-churchs-continuing-cover-up https://patriotpost.us/articles/57746-the-cost-of-homosexual-catholic-abuse

Cuomo's law also says someone who kills a child in the womb can no longer be prosecuted for killing it, as it was not a "life" in the first place. One World Trade Center was lit in pink to celebrate the impending deaths of more New York children than ever before. This despite the fact that 11 preborn children lost on 9/11 are lovingly honored at the 9/11 memorial.

Long overdue.

For those who believe there is some major surgery required to abort at full term, look into "Partial Birth Abortions" and you will see it being done as the baby is being born. As long as the head was not out of the woman, it could be aborted. The doctor jammed scissors into the base of the infant's skull, then sucked it's brains out before letting the head come out of the woman. This new law in NY will allow the exact same procedure to be legal again. It also allows it for ANY reason a doctor puts down on paper. This is pure INFANTICIDE and leftists applauded it in the state house. God help the USA.

Two word response to this post: Kermit Gosnell

They don't speak out against her because they're afraid they will commit suicide by shooting themselves twice in the back of their head.

Was this prize winner ever announced? I haven't seen it.

Next step will be giving them the right to vote, so they can do it openly without having to worry about being caught anymore.

If that's the gun you want, .44 mag is the round to get. You can get more power out of hand loaded or specialty .45 Colt loads, but sacrifice price & convenience.

You could consider bullets designed for the .35 Remington in this round. The spire point 180 grain would seem to be the best choice.

I don't think there is anything more terrible than death, but that's me. The parents can give it up for adoption. There are millions of couples looking to adopt a baby and can't get one. There are also millions of foster parents that do open their doors and take these children in. What I do not want to support is abortion centers like PP with my tax dollars. You want an abortion, you pay for it.

If it's accepted that a woman can have an abortion because of "my body, my choice", why is prostitution still illegal?

Reminds me of the .357 Maximum. I wonder how it would compare to that old round?