ADK Native

President Biden having COVID might be more serious than the media is reporting. Being 79 years old and having a reported medical history of asthma (see below) is of concern. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden “While studying at the University of Delaware and Syracuse University, Biden obtained five student draft deferments, at a time when most draftees were sent to the Vietnam War. In 1968, based on a physical examination, he was given a conditional medical deferment; in 2008, a spokesperson for Biden said his having had "asthma as a teenager" was the reason for the deferment.”

https://www.timesunion.com/state/article/A-single-family-has-donated-300K-to-Hochul-17310875.php?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=headlines&utm_campaign=tu_dailyheadlines&sid=593182583f92a45314a76f37 The article states “Records also show that since December, Tebele's company was paid $637 million in taxpayer funds to provide the state Department of Health — an agency controlled by Hochul — with at-home COVID-19 test kits. The huge expenditure was made without the agency conducting competitive bidding.” Let us focus on the fact that “The huge expenditure was made without the agency conducting competitive bidding.” There was no “competitive bidding” ? Was that legal? Who will investigate?

Witness to Indiana mall shooting praised for killing gunman https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/witness-to-indiana-mall-shooting-praised-for-killing-gunman/ar-AAZHKEm?ocid=SL5GDHP&pc=SL5G&cvid=6d623253664548fd8d74feb6a7aea7d4 The article states “It is rare for a bystander to stop a mass shooting in the United States, according to an analysis by the New York Times. The newspaper showed that only 22 gunmen in the 433 shooting attacks since 2000 were shot by a bystander.” So why does not the New York Times elaborate on why “it is rare”? Could it be nonsense restrictions and prohibitions (GUN FREE ZONES, discriminatory process to not issue permits for self-defense, etc.) placed on law abiding citizens to even carry a concealed weapon? Is it the twisted judicial system that sees criminals as “victims” and is incorrectly concerned about their rights? You can NEVER get the anti-gun/pro-control advocacy to ever listen to the root causes of PEOPLE VIOLENCE. It would simply expose the false information they have been spreading. Proof is Governor Hochuls statement: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kathy-hochul-says-she-doesn-t-need-proof-that-gun-control-keeps-anyone-safe/ar-AAZ379t The article states “New York Gov. Kathy Hochul declared that she didn’t need any statistics to justify preventing people who qualify from acquiring concealed carry permits. “ Hochul does not care about the facts, only her anti-gun owner opinion.

A few articles of interest regarding how evil and stupid Putin really is. Russia Threatens 'Doomsday' if Ukraine Attacks Crimea: Russian Media https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-threatens-doomsday-if-ukraine-attacks-crimea-russian-media/ar-AAZGrk8?OCID=ansmsnnews11 The article states “Mikhail Podolyak, who's a top adviser to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, said Medvedev was merely "a little man forgotten by history, trying to seem serious and scary, but in reality causing only pity. 'A little more, and I'll show you all!' Show what? Kill another child?" Sorry Mikhail, but you must be talking about the real little man, Evil Coward Putin. The article states “Zelensky said Sunday that even back in 2014—during the Crimea invasion and Malaysian Jet getting shot down—Russia was on its way to becoming a terrorist state.” Russia has always been a terrorist state and an enemy of the United States of America and the free world. Russia is responsible for the deaths and injuries of many Americans and her allies. General George Patton was correct about the Russians being the enemy in World War II. Russia in 'Holy War' in Ukraine Against 'Satanic' West, LGBT: Commander https://www.newsweek.com/russia-holy-war-ukraine-against-satanic-west-lgbt-commander-1725372 Apti Alaudinov, the commander of Chechen forces fighting for Russia, praised Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, calling it a "holy war" against the "Satanic" values of Europe and the United States as well as the LGBTQ community. Apti is a loser and leader of another third rate army of loser goons. The real Satanists are he, Putin and all those that follow these freaks of nature. Russian Politicians Want To ‘Take Back’ Alaska, Which Seems Unwise https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russian-politicians-want-to-e2-80-98take-back-e2-80-99-alaska-which-seems-unwise/ar-AAZsm21 The article states “A prominent ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin and member of Russia’s legislature threatened last week to invade Alaska and reclaim the former Russian territory. Vyacheslav Volodin said Russia could “take back” Alaska, the same language Moscow used to describe its invasion of Ukraine. Despite the bluster and Russia’s proximity to Alaska, Volodin’s threat is an utter fantasy, the incompetence of the Russian armed forces laid bare by the war in Ukraine.” “Volodin’s threat is an utter fantasy.” Could not have used the word “fantasy” better. The dangerous thing is that Russia would be forced to use nuclear weapons to stay alive. Why? · Their conventional forces are that of a third rate army. · Russia was unable or unwilling to fight a two war front during World War II where they suffered the highest casualty rate, because they were and still are a third rate army against Germany, who was fighting two fronts. Today Russia is no better now conventionally, if not worse. The Warsaw Pact battle doctrine was to send in Eastern European force first against NATO then Russia would show up with its third rate army. In the old days, Russia was describe as a midget with one huge muscle man arm. Now days and with no disrespect to apes, Russia can be best described as a chimpanzee running wild with a pistol in their hand. Sorry Cheetah!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/hero-armed-citizen-in-mall-stopped-shooter-police-chief/ar-AAZGfGN?ocid=SL5GDHP&li=BBnb7Kz A sad and senseless loss of life caused by some evil coward wanting his five minutes of fame. Fortunately, a law abiding armed citizen did not wait like the COWARD cops did in Uvalde, Texas who sat on their brains while innocent lives were being murdered and injured. They were not brave or smart enough to go into action. A good guy with a gun stopped the killer, NOT all that GUN FREE ZONE, along with the SAFE Act and numerous gun control laws.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/every-branch-us-military-struggling-meet-2022-recruiting-goals-officia-rcna35078 The article states “Last month, Army Chief of Staff Gen. James McConville testified before Congress that only 23% of Americans ages 17-24 are qualified to serve without a waiver to join.” So the other 77% are that unfit and unable to serve? What kind of youth is America raising? Surly not all 77% can possess some real mental and/or physical disability? The article states “An internal Defense Department survey obtained by NBC News found that only 9% of those young Americans eligible to serve in the military had any inclination to do so, the lowest number since 2007.” So the 91% have no interest in the defense of the United States of America? I have been on military operations in a couple countries that were hardly democracies and would frown on such a lack of interest! In conclusion, is the “Draft” going to be reinstated to fill the ranks? I can only image the run on procuring coloring books and teddy bears to calm allot of those draftees!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kathy-hochul-says-she-doesn-t-need-proof-that-gun-control-keeps-anyone-safe/ar-AAZ379t The article states “New York Gov. Kathy Hochul declared that she didn’t need any statistics to justify preventing people who qualify from acquiring concealed carry permits. “ Well when it comes to stupid anti-gun statements, Governor Hochul has put Cuomo’s ‘YOU DON’T NEED TEN BULLETS TO KILL A DEER” in second place. The sheer ignorance and arrogance of Hochul is making Cuomo look better every day…and that is not a compliment. The article states “Hochul claims she doesn’t need those data points because she doesn’t have them.” "She (Hochul) doesn’t need those data points because she doesn’t have them." So this is the methodology that Hochul uses to make her intelligent decisions? This validates what I have been saying for years about the root causes of PEOPLE VIOLENCE. Anti-gun advocates are unwilling or unable to accept the facts of the external causes of PEOPLE VIOLENCE so they continually blame firearms and not problems like illegal drugs, institutionalizing the violently mentally ill, lack of discipline in schools and the welfare system that has caused so many fatherless families. Unfortunately Hochul has taken this to its highest level of ignorance to now blame law abiding pistol permit holders for PEOPLE VIOLENCE. The article states “Hochul’s office boasted to WRGB that New York has a lower homicide rate than GOP-run states with looser gun laws, such as Mississippi. (The homicides in GOP-run states are primarily an issue of homicides in Democratic-run cities, but Hochul wouldn’t dare mention that).” “Homicides in Democratic-run cities”? The truth hurts.

Outrage after NY paper publishes names of gun permit holders https://www.cbsnews.com/news/outrage-after-ny-paper-publishes-names-of-gun-permit-holders/ Anti-gun New York State was way ahead of anti-gun California on this dangerous criminal act. Ten years ago New York State released information of those issued pistol permits. I call it disgusting and dangerous. So if a violent criminal uses that information to locate said law abiding licensed permit holders home, breaks in, steals the handgun and then kills someone with that handgun would not the newspaper and the State of New York employee who provided that information be co-conspirators in the homicide? No surprise, this occurred while Andrew Cuomo was governor.

And the gun control circus carries on folks! https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/new-york-governor-state-to-limit-where-guns-can-be-carried/ar-AAZ0qdv?ocid=SL5GDHP&pc=SL5G&cvid=b79156a7c62d437cb9861fe32f7cc12f The article states “Businesses that want guns around would have to put up a sign reading, “Concealed weapons welcome here,” So the gun haters have evolved from posting GUN FREE ZONE signs to now read CONCEALED WEAPONS WELCOME HERE. Should not the sign read LEGALLY LICENSED FIREARMS WELCOME HERE? Does not Governor Hochul care if the "CONCEALED WEAPONS” are possessed by a licensed permit owner or is it acceptable for criminals to enter with CONCEALED WEAPONS? Strange how the gun haters are calling legally possessed firearms WEAPONS. Law abiding firearm owners do not use such disgusting terminology since their firearms are intended only for legal and peaceful purposes. Hochul must be confused with those who commit PEOPLE VIOLENCE with their illegal firearms that she is unwilling or unable to punish. In the meantime, Hochul is doing all she can do to attack law abiding firearm owners and doing NOTHING to improve security and defensive measures at our schools to protect children. Hochul apparently hates law abiding firearm owners more than those committing PEOPLE VIOLENCE especially against children.

Governor Hochul is on a GUN FREE ZONE declaration binge. My question to her is who is going to be responsible for our protection at the GUN FREE ZONES and who is going to be liable for the death, injuries and damages at these GUN FREE ZONES? Is Hochul is thinking ahead? In other news Hochul is supporting safe havens for drug addicts to shoot up dope. Does Hochul realize that those involved in the distribution, sale and use of dope are involved in the majority of PEOPLE VIOLENCE? Does Hochul realize her plan is enabling more PEOPLE VIOLANCE?

The gun control advocates are hysterical over the thought that law abiding citizens who have been investigated by law enforcement are going to be a problem. Have they took a honest look at who is really causing the PEOPLE VIOLENCE? Imagine, but only imagine if these same gun control advocates put as much hate towards violent criminals as they do against law abiding gun owners we would see a reduction in PEOPLE VIOLENCE.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/repeal-the-second-amendment-no-one-has-the-absolute-right-to-own-any-weapon-they-want/ar-AAYNcRS?ocid=SL5GDHP&li=BBnbfcL Gun control advocacy is a mental disorder. These people live in a fantasy world avoiding reality. This piece of journalistic nonsense proves how unhinged the gun control advocates are in not dealing with the reality of the root causes of PEOPLE VIOLENCE. The article states “A wide-open frontier with dangers from the British and other groups attacking, and the necessity for hunting to feed a family is quite different from our current reality. An environment in which a "standing militia" was needed to provide immediate defensive protection is quite different from today's reality of police departments, National Guard units and a large standing military.” Sorry, but the reality is self-defense is a personal responsibility. We cannot expect the police to protect us or the National Guard to protect us during “mostly peaceful protests”. Need more? Ask the citizens of Ukraine how access to firearms to protect themselves from criminal Russian terrorists is necessary. The article states “The confusion comes in the last line, which says, “to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Let me fix that for the gun control advocates since it actually states “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”. Yes, you forgot the word “People”. It states “People”, not militiaman, police officer or any other descriptive term except “People”. The article states “That mis-reading has also been central in the gun related death of more than 30,000 people every year from suicide, accident and murder.” The majority of those deaths are by suicide. Sad and tragic, but there are many other ways a suicidal person can end there life. Accidental deaths are sad and tragic due to someone’s incompetence. When it comes to murder, there are usually other crimes involved that the media does not want to report. These root causes are generally ignored by the gun control advocates. One of the major crimes related to the homicide by firearms is the distribution, sale and use of illegal drugs. Compounding that problem with illegal drugs is the fact that nearly 108,000 people died of drug overdoses in 2021 (https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/11/health/drug-overdose-deaths-record-high-2021/index.html). Why are not the gun control advocates complaining about all those deaths? The article states “We must start thinking of gun ownership the way we think of smoking cigarettes in public places: considered reprehensible by almost everyone. Only then can enough like-minded politicians be elected and a solution to the gun problem be found. “ Can anyone explain what the analogy to the legal ownership and lawful use of firearms is as related to smoking in public? Again many gun control advocates are unwilling or unable to accept the reality of the true root causes of PEOPLE VIOLENCE. In their vain attempts to advocate for more restrictions and prohibitions to legal firearm ownership, they continue to make nonsense remarks as opposed to attacking criminals. The truly sad thing is there are people and politicians who actually embrace this misguided information.

https://www.yahoo.com/now/frightful-scope-hochul-call-special-163233378.html The article states “Minutes after the release of the opinion — which restricted how local governments can deny permits to carry concealed firearms in public — Gov. Kathy Hochul vowed to call state lawmakers back into session, and New York City Council announced it would pass a resolution seeking Albany’s help.” “Gov. Kathy Hochul vowed to call state lawmakers back into session”? Amazing how these gun control politicians have such energy and focus on immediately working on criminalizing law abiding gun owners, but consistently fail and avoid addressing the control and punishment of violent criminals who commit PEOPLE VIOLENCE. Who are these gun control advocate politicians really working for? Sounds like these gun control advocates “hate law abiding gun owners” and “love violent criminals”. The article states “We do not need people entering our subways, our restaurants, our movie theaters with concealed weapons,” she said. Another example of how far out of touch with reality Hochul is as a politician. Pistol permits mean NOTHING to criminals who commit PEOPLE VIOLENCE. Criminals will carry their illegal guns anywhere they like including Hochuls GUN FREE ZONES. So Hochul can make more useless laws and post lots of ignored signs, but it will not reduce PEOPLE VIOLENCE.

I notice that on the news they have reporters at gas stations interviewing people about the cost of gas. All those interviewed complain the cost is too high. It would be nice if the reporters also asked: “What did you think about the cost of gasoline when former President Trump was in office?” Then ask “Who did you vote for to be president, Biden or Trump?”

Why not just offer free sterilization to all abortion supporters. That should make them happy to never need an abortion.

Leaving "politics" out, the qualifications of the three dissenting justices needs to be noted. Honestly, If these three justices were such constitutional law experts, what part of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" do they not comprehend?

Listening to Governor Hochul and NYC Mayor Adams have concluded they would deny every law abiding New York State citizen the right to carry a concealed weapon for protection. Apparently they believe they are better than others and only the protection of their life matters. And they call themselves "leaders"? What a joke. In other news, Hochul and Adams support more useless gun control laws and no improved security and defensive measures at schools to protect our children. Their display of absolute incompetence in doing their job to protect the most vulnerable members of society, our children, is both cowardly and beyond disgusting.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul reacted to the Supreme Court’s ruling that says the Constitution provides the right to carry a gun outside the home. Hochul called the decision “absolutely shocking” and said the state would “fight back.” “Fight back”? Considering the fact that the people Hochul wants to “fight back” against are law abiding citizens, not the violent criminals committing PEOPLE VIOLENCE expresses great concern of her ability to reason. Hochuls very words of “fight back” does not sound very peaceful or passive. If Hochul does not want you to protect yourself, then she should set the example and go into public without armed guards. Are we not all equal? In other news, Hochul has legislated more useless gun laws, but has taken no action to improve security to protect our school children. I see a trend in people who support baby killing with legislating more useless gun control laws rather than enforce real security measures to protect our school children. Apparently the lives of children are of little or no concern to some. What is “absolutely shocking” as Hochul states is her and her supporters failure to improve security to protect our children.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dont-forget-the-first-half-of-the-second-amendment/ar-AAYdmAo?ocid=SL5GDHP&li=BBnbfcL First, I need to point out that The Atlantic is not part of conservative or even balanced media. It is important to follow the anti-gun media to intelligently, but with courtesy expose their ignorance. The real crime is gun control advocates are relentless in the quest for more gun control laws regardless that they are not fixing the PEOPLE VIOLENCE problem. The article states “they ignore entirely the imperative that precedes, the framing device of the whole thing—to protect “the security of a free State.” “They ignore”? The Second Amendment was crafted to first give militia rights to all states to protect themselves since there was some notable distrust between different states. This “militia” evolved into our present day National Guard that is commanded by the state’s governor to serve at their digression. The second part was an individual right as the authors were too familiar with tyrannical government leaders for individual protection. Simply said giving you the means necessary for “your God given right to self-defense”. The article states “According to the gun lobby, individuals engaged in their own fantasy of the heroic citizen equipped to do battle against tyrannical government agents would suffer incalculable collective costs were Americans to restrict their access to weapons.” OK, using the demeaning phrase “their own fantasy of the heroic citizen equipped to do battle against tyrannical government agents” sheds light on the anti-gun attitude of The Atlantic. Sad, but these are the same supporters of more gun control, but are silent when it comes to legislating better security and defensive measure to protect children. The article states “If the choice were the lives of children or the political imagination of a vocal group of armament activists, whose costs should matter more? The inconvenience of some or the lives of others?” How about the government “choice” to advocate for improving the security and defense of schools, serious punishment for violent criminals, institutionalizing the violently mentally ill and a real war on drugs as opposed to more gun control? The article states “Meanwhile, the rest of us suffer the costs of the actual tyranny that living in a state of fear of mass gun violence creates.” Law abiding firearm owners are suffering for gun control nonsense, but let’s not profile the people committing PEOPLE VIOLENCE. It may come as a shock to learn about the risk factors and linked crime that leads to PEOPLE VIOLENCE and how the government has caused and failed to correct these problems. The anti-gun supporters would be exposed to the truth that there are other factors above and beyond firearm ownership that causes PEOPLE VIOLENCE. The article states “Proposals to make schools more like fortresses only add to the costs children bear rather than addressing the root constitutional problem—that insufficient regulation of guns impairs the liberties of all.” What “cost children bear”? What “cost” does having an armed officer and/or teachers cause the children? What “cost” does having improved communication equipment with staff and local law enforcement cause the children? What “cost” doe having harden barriers to enter a school cause children? What “cost” does having more secure doors to the classroom to kept perpetrators out so the children can escape out a window? Funny how The Atlantic does not draw any analogies to our present airport security to prevent PEOPLE VIOLENCE. Why would The Atlantic ignore the success of TSA and the Air Marshals? Because it works? Finally the article states “We can be free, but only if we regulate guns—just as the Second Amendment tells us.” No, regulating firearms is only part of protecting innocent lives. The government needs to support good law enforcement, better prosecution and punishment for violent criminals, institutionalize the violently mentally ill and attack the common denominators associated with violent crime like the distribution, sale and use of drugs, and to eliminate the environment that causes that effect our youth from being at risk to turn to crime like failed schools and the welfare system that enables fatherless homes. Then “we can be free”.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/new-york-officials-fear-supreme-court-ruling-will-mean-more-gun-crime/ar-AAY9t5d?ocid=SL5GDHP&pc=SL5G&cvid=1e0c9b1e9ceb4ebdab16adc1a20156c8 The article states “Every weekday morning in a nondescript office building in downtown Manhattan, representatives from dozens of law enforcement agencies meet to discuss gun arrests and shootings in New York City from the day before.” I would love to be in that meeting to see what they discuss. I wonder if they are looking at other crimes associated with illegal firearm possession and use? I wonder if they see the common denominators linked in PEOPLE VIOLENCE like the distribution, sale and use of illegal drugs, violent felon that should of stayed in jail and the violently mentally ill people that should be institutionalized. The article states ““A lot more people are going to now want to go out and get guns. And for all the wrong reasons,” said Richard Aborn, the president of the nonprofit Citizens Crime Commission.” That has to be the most ignorant statement. So “all the wrong reasons” are to possess a firearm for hunting, collecting, target shooting and God forbidden that God given right of self-defense? The article states ““I have people telling me they decided to get a gun that I never dreamed would go out and get a gun. They’re not going to use it illegally but they’re feeling this need to arm themselves in a way that I’ve not seen before.” Mr. Aborn said “that I’ve not seen before.”? Because people are concerned for their lives. Too many politicians and their supporters coddle the violent criminals, they create a failed welfare state that has created fatherless families, they failed to address proper mental health care for the violently mentally ill, they have made the public schools a social experiment rather than intuition of education and discipline, they failed to control the distribution, sale and use of illegal drugs, they fail to support responsible law enforcement to and the list of failures goes on. Where has Mr. Aborn been? The article states “And if more New Yorkers are armed, he said, what would otherwise have been minor confrontations could turn deadly.” That is true. Some people are unable or unwilling to control themselves. They are generally suffering from some degree of emotional disturbance, mental illness and/or intellectual deficiency. I have witness on this forum some who make personal attacks calling someone’s parents farm animals, your drugs, your delusional and many other inappropriate language. I once saw a statement that could be construed as a physical threat when someone wrote they would tell it to their face. Very sad, but these people are out there. They should seriously decide if they should carry a concealed weapon. Using deadly force is just that, it usually makes the other person dead. The article states “In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul has said that she would consider calling a special session of the State Legislature if the law were overturned.” A special session to do what? Legislate more useless gun control laws like the SAFE Act? The article states “A spokeswoman for the governor declined to elaborate further on the preparations.” That is because they are unwilling or unable because of their incompetency and loyalty to gun control addict voters to honestly fix the problem of PEOPLE VIOLENCE. The article states “While the state court system does not keep a centralized database of how many licenses are approved or denied, they are typically easier to obtain in rural areas than in cities, according to New York’s solicitor general, Barbara D. Underwood, who argued the state’s case in front of the Supreme Court.” So New York State government does not know who has a pistol permit? Did not the SAFE Act duplicate this since the Sheriff’s office has always maintained those records? Where do these people get their information from? The article states “Chanelle Anderson, a 33-year-old violence “interrupter” who works with the nonprofit BronxConnect to intervene in potential conflicts, said that greater access to guns would likely increase the number of shootings and the number of people sent to jail or prison. “If they legalize firearms, that’s making it easier to destroy our communities even more,” she said.” So “legalize firearms” will make it “easier to destroy our communities even more”? Where does Ms. Anderson get her information? Maybe the destruction of “our communities" is due to illegal drugs, fatherless families, a welfare system that enables people to be lazy, failed schools and just plain lack of common courtesy.

None. Yes, NONE!

It’s a done deal. As usual, it’s all GUN CONTROL and no CRIMINAL CONTROL or making schools more secure and safe. Our children are not safer because of these worthless new laws. New York Governor Signs New Curbs On Guns In Wake Of Mass Shootings https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/new-york-governor-signs-new-curbs-on-guns-in-wake-of-mass-shootings/ar-AAY95xw?ocid=SL5GDHP&li=BBnb7Kz Do not hold your breath. It’s all gun control and NO criminal control. Our school children are in just as much danger thanks to the gun control addicts. The article states "This is a moral moment for the people of New York but also the rest of the nation," said Governor Hochul. No, it’s an IMMORAL MOMENT. As always Hochul and the other gun control politicians fail to take action to protect innocent people. It takes real morals to do the right thing, and nonsense gun laws that only serve to restrict and prohibit access to firearms by law abiding citizens. Hochul and her supporters are unwilling or unable to legislate effective security and defensive measures at schools, support law enforcement, properly punish violent criminals, institutionalize the “violently” mentally ill, bring real discipline back to schools and junk the welfare system that has destroyed the family unit enabling fatherless families. The article states "Follow what we did here in New York and we'll finally start to be at the beginning of the end of all this gun violence and the massacres that are occurring every day in our country." Follow nothing Hochul. Those of us with a functioning intellect know your all smoke in mirror to deceive the weak minded into “thinking” your laws with reduce or eliminate PEOPLE VIOLENCE. Your nonsense SAFE Acts and other useless laws did not work at attacking the root causes of PEOPLE VIOLENCE. So what makes anyone that does not have a functioning intellect believe restricting someone to have to attain the age of 21 to purchase a semi-automatic firearm? Personally as a teenage I was issued and trained to be an expert with a REAL assault rifle, the M16A1. I wonder if that sends shivers down the spine of gun control addicts because I had not attained the magical age of 21? They say these mass shooters want their five minutes of fame. Why not bring back public hanging for these monsters? They will get their five minutes of fame swinging from a rope in public for all to see that the government does not condone murder. Again, Albert Einstein is correct “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” That insanity are gun laws that only restricts and prohibits law abiding citizens for possessing firearms. Nothing changes.

100% correct. The Democrats are the champions of unborn baby killing, children killing and the killing of the elderly. Their heads are more up and concerned about criminals and the lazy parasites of society. As one famous Democrat said "Rahm Emanuel - You never let a serious crisis go to waste." In their continual allowance to prevent school shootings and other people violence using firearms it helps validate their false and twisted "gun control" agenda. It enables them to garner the support of so many ignorant people to go out with their stupid signs advocating for restrictions and prohibitions for firearm ownership. Many years ago I address the "gun control circus" with Senator Schumer in a letter. About six months later he sent me a letter thanking me for my support of animals rights. What a joke. Real innocent people dying is what they need to promote their "gun control" agenda.

Albert Einstein : “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Gun control addicts are unwilling or unable to accept the facts that allot of gun control laws are useless in stopping PEOPLE VIOLANCE. Still they support politicians who think similarly. You would think that many New York State gun control politicians would have learned from the failures of the SAFE Act, it is not about the guns, it’s about the violent sociopaths. They just validate Albert Einstein’s view of insanity. Sadly I realize that many politicians do not really care about children. Many politicians who support gun control also support abortion (AKA: BABY KILLING). The proof is these gun control addict politicians legislate more useless gun laws rather than improve security and harden defenses at schools. Apparently killing an unborn child verses an eight year old child must not matter to them. Need proof? Along with passage of worthless gun laws they protect abortion (AKA: BABY KILLING). Those are the facts. So in conclusion, our schools will not be any more secure with these useless gun laws. Our children will continue to be vulnerable to death and injury from PEOPLE VIOLANCE unless the politicians start increasing security and defensive measures at every school.