Latest info and answers to questions about NY States new gun laws

[ADK Native]

These new gun control laws are fully intenede to harass, intimidate and threaten law abiding firearm owners.  Nothing became worst for criminals did it?

The politicans who follow Governor Hochul can do becasue they have no interest in protecting you.  Need proof?  they have no probellm killing unborn human beings without due process.  Just kill them.  Life is cheap to them, except for keeping dangeours violent criminals aliove.

Just like SAFE Act !, nothing is done to legistlate better security for "sensitive areas" as described in the new gun control law, funding for more and better trained police, buiding mental heatlh facilitiues to insttuionalize the violenbtly mentally ill, building more priosns to keep violent criminals locked up, building drug addict rehabiltaion faciites to cure drug aaddicts wher last yearthere was over 100,000 drug over dose deaths and the list of their failures goes on and on.

[ADK Native]

I feel we can be entrapped by these new laws. There are so many situations/scenarios that can be played out, but the information is unclear and/or unavailable.

Somehow having a firearm in a locked case is just as secure as a soft fabric case.  If a criminal were to break into your vehicle, both cases have nice handles for both to be easily carried away!  Also why would a gun hater care if the case is fire proof...if the case catches on fire then one less firearm available for them to hate!  So what exactly is the purpose for the fire proof, hard and locked firearm case requirement?

What if you dismantle a firearm, do you still need the hard fire-proof locked case?  The criminal steals the hard fire-proof locked case, easily busts off the lock and they have a fully functioning firearm.  What if you had a bolt action rifle, remove the bolt and store it separate for the stocked action?  It is not capable of being discharged.  How about removing the barrel from a shotgun and storing it separate from the stocked action?  It also is not capable of being discharged. 

So we need someone with real intelligence to explain these new laws before we interact with law enforcement to avoid arrest.  But could that be the goal of these new nonsense laws?

 

Edited September 3, 2022 by ADK Native

[land 1]

there is no intelligence behind any of this nor can it be explained, its a political stunt no matter what the laws are true criminals are not going to follow them period and yet this state has no bail laws and are easy on true criminals. 

[ridgerunner88]

Reading the judge’s ruling, even though he didnt over turn the state’s law, he did provide some great arguments that may help future cases shoot these laws down.

One specifically was how the social media requirement violates 1st and 5th amendment rights.

He went on for 20+ pages on how the law is bull crap. So I am confident the state bit off more than they can chew… no way these hold up, especially if one gets to the SCOTUS.

sucks now but this wont last


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Grouse]

And Biden says it's the conservatives who "don't respect the Rule of Law".

Here we have a judge saying none of this NY law is Constitutional and violates the Rule of Law, yet he lets it stand on the basis the group who sued "has no standing"?  That's exactly the way the leftists threw out all of the lawsuits saying the 2020 election was stolen.  We have a very corrupt legal system in this country.

It could take decades for this crap to go through the legal system, which is exactly why Hochul did it.  She knew that she could use this law as a stall tactic for years, and nothing will happen to her for intentionally violating people's rights.  But God forbid you refuse to bake a cake or arrange flowers for a gay wedding.  That will get you sued out of business and maybe jailed.  the legal system has become a tool of the political left.  The legal system doesn't respect the Rule of Law!