Jump to content

Pictures vs being there


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, First-light said:

You guys were close. 20" inside 152#. My point is I thought it was much bigger from the photo. Maybe its just me but I always think photos make the deer and rack bigger. Just me I guess. 

100% Not to many times have I seen a picture of the deer then the actual deer and thought man that picture really does not do the deer justice. It's almost always the opposite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have guessed 18" inside but never guess on weight because I am usually wrong which is why I bought a scale.

All I know is some of the ones I have dragged out felt like 400 lbs. and they didn't weigh half of that:heat:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...