Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/04/12 in all areas

  1. Not if you plant a teeny-tiny food plot in it. :lol:
    2 points
  2. What we chose to do with our money is our business, no matter what we spend it on. But as far as the school budget goes we have no control over how much they raise our taxes. We have no choice!!!!!!! But to pay for salaries and benefit of teachers making over $100,000 in my area , many are there less than 30 of service. And make much more than $100,000 a year, how much is enough???????
    1 point
  3. Brought it out today and it was pretty sweet. Just used the iron sights and at 50yrds it was pretty good. No jams no nothing. 80 rounds. I'll put better sights on it (aim point....scope) dont know yet. ny hunter is a genius
    1 point
  4. sounds like a great idea for anyone that's ever gotten a Chia Pet as a gift,lol!
    1 point
  5. The dec must feel that 150' is safe to be recomending that. if we listend to everyone's safest idea we wouldn't have any guns/bows/hunting in general. or sports for that matter or cars that can go faster than 5mph(bumper rating for safety). Again there are laws for reckless endangerment. This propoasal simple puts the distance at a reasonable commonsence distance instead of lumping it in with gun. which is what happend when this law was enacted in the firstplace. A bow is not the same as a firearm, it doesn't use fire to project its projectile its max range is much shorter than a gun and as such the "safe" distance should be reduced. If you drive to fast in a neighborhood or swerve in a car you can get a ticket for reckless endangerment, same as if you shoot toward an unsafe backstop even if your 500'or more away and hit someones house with an errant shot.. Your concerns are covered by different laws! you can't have and all encompassing law for distance,safety,ethics it wouldn't be possible. Take the proposal for what it is reducing the distance to allow managment in areas that are now overly restricted by an out-dated law meant for guns.
    1 point
  6. I do not practice with more than one arrow at a specfic target for that reason... it gets expensive fast. not that i am an awe inspiring shot but i've lost more than a dozen arrows to robinhood/ nock/fletching damage/ and cracking hangers over a period of years.. its not worth it to me ..the cost of multiple targets is quickly off set when looking at cost of replacing damaged/ ruined arrows..
    1 point
  7. i've seen that before . What a POS ! And , 3 years of college and a 3 year old would have a better vocabulary !
    1 point
  8. If reviews are mixed, then might not be a great idea. While Ohio has great hunting, it's not the place I would book a hunt. I'd either go public or gain permission or lease. Obviously if you have other constraints then it makes sense, but Ohio still has alot to offer and the amount of public land that is legit quality hunting is unreal. There are pockets of it all over the state.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...