Rattler

You seem to be confused about the powers the President possesses. Obama has abused "Executive Order" to implement many social policies, that may eventually be legislated against, possibly even taken to the SCOTUS, before they are completely vetted for American support or the lack thereof. No President has the power to repeal any part of the US Constitution, or any of it's amendments, without going through the process outlined in the Constitution itself. Many have actually implemented policies that violate the Constitution and eventually saw them overturned. I believe Trump respects the will of the people regarding social issues, but would not support pushing his own beliefs on the masses if they were not in agreement with him. If the majority of Americans make it clear they want the misguided bathroom order overturned, I do not think he will try to stop it.

I just hate when all the things that used to make the site easy to navigate are either moved, or no longer seem to exist. I hate having to hunt around on the site looking for features I used to use. I was happy with the old site. What advantages does this new change offer me? I don't see any at this time.

No, it's not a fact. Just because Trump says he has no problem with it doesn't mean he would force it upon the people like Obama did. If the people demand it be stopped, Trump will stop it.

The people of NC aren't blaming the GOP for the trouble. They're blaming those who wrote the law. There's the morons for ya.

No posted land is actually off limits to the public for hunting. If you have the intelligence to find the owner, meet him or her personally, get to know him or her, learn what rules there are for hunting on the land, and helping the owner with some work around the property every year, I'm sure you can get access to hunt. Most landowners just don't want someone on their land that they don't know.

Call came in as a man with a gun threatening someone. Cops show up and it appears the autistic man is a threat to the black man with his hands up. A HISPANIC cop feels the man with the supposed gun is going to hurt the black man on the ground with his hands up. The HISPANIC cop decides to shoot the man he believes has a gun and ACCIDENTALLY shoots the black man in the LEG. In some judgmental minds, that makes the cop a criminal. They have little grey matter to work with and what they have is already polluted by Leftist Anti-Police Terrorist propaganda. If not for people like Redneck and groups like BLM, this little incident wouldn't even make the news. They should be happy the black guy just won the virtual liability lottery and taxpayers will be paying him millions because of one cop's error in judgement.

You have a problem with those quotes? With the NRA? LaPierre didn't say what you said.

LOL! Man, they are all gonna be really upset when Trump gets elected. The article fails to make it VERY clear, these quotes are old and were said when these people really thought Trump had no chance of winning the primaries. BTW, most of the people quoted have never done anything to make this country better or stop the Democrats from destroying it. I suspect they are worried what will be exposed about them when Trump is the POTUS and goes after all the elected hacks who served themselves, rather than the people that elected them. That's why they are not at the convention.

Why does the video not show the man getting shot? It may have been an accidental shooting, but your video shows nothing of substance that would reveal anything about it. Why did they take out the part where he actually got shot? It's a rhetorical question by the way.

Glad to see you finally figured it out, after making your usual round of presumptuous comments, further proving your inability to employ proper cognitive reasoning.

Your point is invalid. Compared to Democrat thought processes, Republicans are Albert Einstein.

It appears you posted a video on the Baton Rouge cop killer. You fugged up if that wasn't your intent. However I suspect your post should be titled, "Police shooting another violent criminal resisting arrest". I wait for it with great anticipation.

The only other debate I can use as an analogy to the "man made" climate change debate is the "Is there a God?" debate. There isn't scientific evidence available to prove either one. Unfortunately believers in God are far less fanatical about forcing their belief on others.

Why does anyone care? Do you really think these guys are any threat to anyone? There are real criminals on the loose that are psychopaths and elected officials. You guys are worried about these guys because they don't like the Leftist agenda, where the other criminals I mentioned, do. .

Show me where any other country in the world is taxing anyone's "carbon footprint". I'd love to see that. Show me where they are regulating any of their businesses out of business. Show me where they are putting anyone out of work like we've done to coal miners.

I don't find it disturbing. I find it predictable.

The climate is changing. It has always been changing. The "science" has yet to prove it's man made. But, just to go a step further, let's say it did prove it was man made. One political party claims the solution is higher taxes and more regulations on America and it's citizens, knowing full well the rest of the world will do nothing about it. Does that sound like it will have any type of a positive impact on climate change? Does it sound like it will have a very negative impact on America and it's economy? That's why people think it's all a conspiracy designed to take America down to the level of 3rd world countries by re-distributing America's wealth. Perhaps if the Left were to take the political agenda out of the "science", more people would be open to the possibility that climate change is man made. I don't think that will ever happen though, because the Left would scorch the earth before it would ever stop pushing it's political agenda.

Hillary's supporters tried to burn an American flag outside the RNC today. That didn't work out well for them.

You're pretty selective about what criminals you believe are a threat to you. BTW, Hillary did NOT have her day in court, as she wasn't even held accountable for her crimes with an indictment. Just proves the law is not equal in America. For Democrats, nothing in America deserves equality of treatment.

They already know how to hunt, but not for deer, or any other game animal.

Obama's US Fish & Wildlife agency seems to have no problem with dead Bald Eagles or Golden Eagles, as long as they don't die from lead ammo. http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/look-which-national-symbol-obama-wants-to-eliminate-now

Deers? Anyway, we don't allow deer hunting in too many places. That is the cause of the over overpopulation. They say it's too dangerous to allow hunters to hunt in these places. Yet they think it might be a good idea to allow cougars to inhabit these places? Seems completely illogical to me, unless you hate hunting so much, you will try any hair brained idea to replace it.

Be specific. What "common sense" laws do they want enacted and why? Is there any proof, data or evidence they will be effective at reducing "gun violence"? Also, why do you feel the need to support them? Is ending the ability of American youth to enjoy shooting sports your idea of "common sense" gun laws? If they try to force unconstitutional mandates on responsible gun owners, the coming revolution will be very ugly, but justified. "Remember the only thing that can stop a bad man with a law is a good guy with a law..." This is about the most ridiculous pablum I've even read. I'm not even sure what it is attempting to say. It doesn't make sense, no less common sense. I think it means you want more laws, bigger government, less freedom and less individual liberty. Why? Because criminals have been allowed to run loose and create anarchy? They haven't paid any attention to any current laws, but they will to new ones? Unbelievable. BTW, people like you calling me ignorant has no impact on me, because I do not value your opinion when you express your misguided beliefs.

You do know about ignorance. You've mastered it. Try looking into an un-biased anti-gun source to find information on why the CDC was stopped from researching "gun violence". And while your at it, get some info on why the ATF had to be stopped from abusing it's powers and harassing law abiding gun owners to the point of tyranny. Neither of these things were passed to "keep gun owners ignorant about gun violence". Gun owners know all about it, because they are being blamed for all of it. These laws were passed to stop the government from putting the burden of gun violence on responsible law abiding gun owners. The problem with the government, when it's controlled by Leftists, is they will use any crises of violence in America to further restrict the rights of citizens who've had ZERO involvement in it, to further their gun grabbing agenda. You need to learn a lot about government encroachment on individual liberties before you start talking about being any kind of expert on these issues. Your other comment about not wanting to sit at the government table and discuss giving up more of our rights is one of the most naive statements on gun rights I've ever heard. You think they try to force even greater infringements on responsible gun owners when they refuse to accept more of them? They wanted those infringements from day one! They just want us at the table so they can say we refuse to accept their ridiculous restrictions, (that are proven to be ineffective) so they can point their fuggin' fingers and say "They're the bad guys". If there weren't ignorant, clueless idiots in the electorate believing their lies, gun owners wouldn't have anything to worry about. No matter how often gun owners prove, the multitude of existing gun laws are more than capable of controlling gun violence, if they were enforced, there will always be people who think more restrictions on a Constitutional right will work, when all of the current ones, don't. It's not about "gun violence", it's about eliminating rights!