Jump to content

Request to be exempt from f.o.i.l with pistol permit is out what a joke


Recommended Posts

They made it seem when they passed the law, that you could just opt out.

I would use number 2, explain it in number 5. I would think of something, and then lets see if they would deny it. Then, I would get a lawyer and cause some trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I'm confused about the whole concept behind this "Opt-out" stuff. It seems to me that if they have decided that the information doesn't really have to be released to the public then why does witholding the info have to be done one person at a time. For crying out loud, just make the whole data base out of bounds for the F.O.I.L. stuff.

Now somebody has to be hired to manually input all these opt-outs into the data base. What a waste. Just exclude the whole database from F.O.I.L. activity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I'm confused about the whole concept behind this "Opt-out" stuff. It seems to me that if they have decided that the information doesn't really have to be released to the public then why does witholding the info have to be done one person at a time. For crying out loud, just make the whole data base out of bounds for the F.O.I.L. stuff.

Now somebody has to be hired to manually input all these opt-outs into the data base. What a waste. Just exclude the whole database from F.O.I.L. activity.

I'd be guessing it has to do with the law that any permits or licensing has to be public knowledge in NY, and by making one type of permit off limits by the state it would be open to a court challenge. By allowing each individual a way to opt out, thats the backdoor way to keep it away from the lawyers (its an action of the permitee, not the granter of the permit; the state is just giving the mechanism to do so).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be guessing it has to do with the law that any permits or licensing has to be public knowledge in NY, and by making one type of permit off limits by the state it would be open to a court challenge. By allowing each individual a way to opt out, thats the backdoor way to keep it away from the lawyers (its an action of the permitee, not the granter of the permit; the state is just giving the mechanism to do so).

Maybe so. I sure am not any expert on the laws surrounding the F.O.I.L. stuff or any other kind of legal junk. It just seems a bit wacked-out to create all this extra paper-work. But I'll bet that isn't the first time that's been the case .... lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+2 for line 4. plus line five: "I have reason to belive that I may be setting myself up for unwarranted harassment as there are a lot of anti-gun and anti-hunters out there that exhibit irrational behavior from time to time. specific harrassing and terrorist acts (with dates, times, and persons involved) to serve as additional supportive information availible on request." REASON ENOUGH!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...