skeets716 Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2014/10/cornell_university_deer_population_buck_magnets.html#incart_river Really?? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasteddie Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Very interesting ........ but stupid ! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 That's why tuition is so high at Cornell at 1200 a deer they have to pay for it some how. More money than common sense. Can you see on your tuition bill a charge for deer sterilizations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYBuckHunter Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Look at the bright side, they tried something that the antis have been pumping for years, and proved that it doesnt have the desired effect. Maybe the results will become more well known, and it can be used to show the antis how much of a farce their idea is. Could be a win for us hunters. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Culvercreek hunt club Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 you guys read the comments, I have heard this too but the Anti's are now pushing for full ovary removal because that stops the estrous cycle. You know what, let them eat their homes to the ground until they allow access. lol. I keep hearing how hunters can't make the required reductions. I don't agree. in areas that need it, access, more tags, allow baiting and get it done. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfdeputy2 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 I am going to try this in my area in NH so I can get all the bucks within 10 miles on my property Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFA-ADK Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 They are trying this on LI. This has been known to cause buck mortality due to doe going into estrous every month. Horrible idea that has proven ineffective for years. Yet each town apparently needs to try it and then say WOW it does not work here, just like every other town it was tried in, da I wonder why? With 35,000 deer estimated on LI the cost would be staggering! But we can just raise the taxes in NY some more to justify it? 1,200$ per deer times lets just say 10,000 deer = 12,000,000$. Talk about wasting money, instead of charging bow hunters and making more money. Such smart people in charge it is amazing! Sarcasm at its best! The stupidity of these politicians and elected officials who bow to the activist is astounding. (Look what we did, we reduced the population by spending a bunch of money, O wait we did not reduce any population, dam.) How can we spend more money to fix the problem? Daaa Bow hunters are the safest and most effective way to cull deer populations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfdeputy2 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 With 35,000 deer estimated on LI the cost would be staggering! But we can just raise the taxes in NY some more to justify it? 1,200$ per deer times lets just say 10,000 deer = 12,000,000$. Talk about wasting money, instead of charging bow hunters and making more money. Such smart people in charge it is amazing! Sarcasm at its best! I was going to say if they paid bowhunters a $50 bounty for each Doe look how much money they would save with the idiots thinking this crap up I would make them pay me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.